Cargando…

A multiscale natural community and species-level vulnerability assessment of the Gulf Coast, USA

Vulnerability assessments combine quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity of species or natural communities to current and future threats. When combined with the economic, ecological or evolutionary value of the species, vulnerability assessments...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reece, Joshua Steven, Watson, Amanda, Dalyander, Patricia Soupy, Edwards, Cynthia Kallio, Geselbracht, Laura, LaPeyre, Megan K., Tirpak, Blair E., Tirpak, John M., Woodrey, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29958277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199844
_version_ 1783336358140444672
author Reece, Joshua Steven
Watson, Amanda
Dalyander, Patricia Soupy
Edwards, Cynthia Kallio
Geselbracht, Laura
LaPeyre, Megan K.
Tirpak, Blair E.
Tirpak, John M.
Woodrey, Mark
author_facet Reece, Joshua Steven
Watson, Amanda
Dalyander, Patricia Soupy
Edwards, Cynthia Kallio
Geselbracht, Laura
LaPeyre, Megan K.
Tirpak, Blair E.
Tirpak, John M.
Woodrey, Mark
author_sort Reece, Joshua Steven
collection PubMed
description Vulnerability assessments combine quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity of species or natural communities to current and future threats. When combined with the economic, ecological or evolutionary value of the species, vulnerability assessments quantify the relative risk to regional species and natural communities and can enable informed prioritization of conservation efforts. Vulnerability assessments are common practice in conservation biology, including the potential impacts of future climate scenarios. However, geographic variation in scenarios and vulnerabilities is rarely quantified. This gap is particularly limiting for informing ecosystem management given that conservation practices typically vary by sociopolitical boundaries rather than by ecological boundaries. To support prioritization of conservation actions across a range of spatial scales, we conducted the Gulf Coast Vulnerability Assessment (GCVA) for four natural communities and eleven focal species around the Gulf of Mexico based on current and future threats from climate change and land-use practices out to 2060. We used the Standardized Index of Vulnerability and Value (SIVVA) tool to assess both natural community and species vulnerabilities. We observed greater variation across ecologically delineated subregions within the Gulf Coast of the U.S. than across climate scenarios. This novel finding suggests that future vulnerability assessments incorporate regional variation and that conservation prioritization may vary across ecological subregions. Across subregions and climate scenarios the most prominent threats were legacy effects, primarily from habitat loss and degradation, that compromised the adaptive capacity of species and natural communities. The second most important threats were future threats from sea-level rise. Our results suggest that the substantial threats species and natural communities face from climate change and sea-level rise would be within their adaptive capacity were it not for historic habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6025860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60258602018-07-07 A multiscale natural community and species-level vulnerability assessment of the Gulf Coast, USA Reece, Joshua Steven Watson, Amanda Dalyander, Patricia Soupy Edwards, Cynthia Kallio Geselbracht, Laura LaPeyre, Megan K. Tirpak, Blair E. Tirpak, John M. Woodrey, Mark PLoS One Research Article Vulnerability assessments combine quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity of species or natural communities to current and future threats. When combined with the economic, ecological or evolutionary value of the species, vulnerability assessments quantify the relative risk to regional species and natural communities and can enable informed prioritization of conservation efforts. Vulnerability assessments are common practice in conservation biology, including the potential impacts of future climate scenarios. However, geographic variation in scenarios and vulnerabilities is rarely quantified. This gap is particularly limiting for informing ecosystem management given that conservation practices typically vary by sociopolitical boundaries rather than by ecological boundaries. To support prioritization of conservation actions across a range of spatial scales, we conducted the Gulf Coast Vulnerability Assessment (GCVA) for four natural communities and eleven focal species around the Gulf of Mexico based on current and future threats from climate change and land-use practices out to 2060. We used the Standardized Index of Vulnerability and Value (SIVVA) tool to assess both natural community and species vulnerabilities. We observed greater variation across ecologically delineated subregions within the Gulf Coast of the U.S. than across climate scenarios. This novel finding suggests that future vulnerability assessments incorporate regional variation and that conservation prioritization may vary across ecological subregions. Across subregions and climate scenarios the most prominent threats were legacy effects, primarily from habitat loss and degradation, that compromised the adaptive capacity of species and natural communities. The second most important threats were future threats from sea-level rise. Our results suggest that the substantial threats species and natural communities face from climate change and sea-level rise would be within their adaptive capacity were it not for historic habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation. Public Library of Science 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6025860/ /pubmed/29958277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199844 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reece, Joshua Steven
Watson, Amanda
Dalyander, Patricia Soupy
Edwards, Cynthia Kallio
Geselbracht, Laura
LaPeyre, Megan K.
Tirpak, Blair E.
Tirpak, John M.
Woodrey, Mark
A multiscale natural community and species-level vulnerability assessment of the Gulf Coast, USA
title A multiscale natural community and species-level vulnerability assessment of the Gulf Coast, USA
title_full A multiscale natural community and species-level vulnerability assessment of the Gulf Coast, USA
title_fullStr A multiscale natural community and species-level vulnerability assessment of the Gulf Coast, USA
title_full_unstemmed A multiscale natural community and species-level vulnerability assessment of the Gulf Coast, USA
title_short A multiscale natural community and species-level vulnerability assessment of the Gulf Coast, USA
title_sort multiscale natural community and species-level vulnerability assessment of the gulf coast, usa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29958277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199844
work_keys_str_mv AT reecejoshuasteven amultiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT watsonamanda amultiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT dalyanderpatriciasoupy amultiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT edwardscynthiakallio amultiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT geselbrachtlaura amultiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT lapeyremegank amultiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT tirpakblaire amultiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT tirpakjohnm amultiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT woodreymark amultiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT reecejoshuasteven multiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT watsonamanda multiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT dalyanderpatriciasoupy multiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT edwardscynthiakallio multiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT geselbrachtlaura multiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT lapeyremegank multiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT tirpakblaire multiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT tirpakjohnm multiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa
AT woodreymark multiscalenaturalcommunityandspecieslevelvulnerabilityassessmentofthegulfcoastusa