Cargando…
Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bovine bone substitute (Compact Bone B. ®) alone versus bovine bone substitute and simvastatin for human maxillary sinus augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 16 sinuses in eight patients. Radiographic assess...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971118 |
_version_ | 1783336384045514752 |
---|---|
author | Yaghobee, Siamak Ghahroudi, Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Khorsand, Afshin Mahmoudi, Sanaz Rafiei, Sahar Chokami |
author_facet | Yaghobee, Siamak Ghahroudi, Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Khorsand, Afshin Mahmoudi, Sanaz Rafiei, Sahar Chokami |
author_sort | Yaghobee, Siamak |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bovine bone substitute (Compact Bone B. ®) alone versus bovine bone substitute and simvastatin for human maxillary sinus augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 16 sinuses in eight patients. Radiographic assessments were done preoperatively (T0), immediately (T1) and at nine months after sinus grafting (T2). Alveolar bone height and density were assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using Planmeca Romexis™ Imaging Software 2.2. RESULTS: The change in alveolar bone height and density between T0, T1 and T2 was significant in both groups. Alveolar bone height (h0, h1, h2) and vertical height of the grafted bone (g1, g2) in three lines (anterior, middle and posterior) were not significantly different between groups. The grafted bone height shrinkage (%) in the anterior, middle and posterior limits of the augmented area were not significantly different between groups. The existing alveolar and grafted bone density increased significantly in both groups between T1 and T2, except for the existing alveolar bone density in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the alveolar bone density values obtained in TI and T2 between groups, except for the existing alveolar bone density at T1. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show any significant positive effect for simvastatin in maxillary sinus augmentation based on radiographic examination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6026100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60261002018-07-03 Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Yaghobee, Siamak Ghahroudi, Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Khorsand, Afshin Mahmoudi, Sanaz Rafiei, Sahar Chokami J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bovine bone substitute (Compact Bone B. ®) alone versus bovine bone substitute and simvastatin for human maxillary sinus augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 16 sinuses in eight patients. Radiographic assessments were done preoperatively (T0), immediately (T1) and at nine months after sinus grafting (T2). Alveolar bone height and density were assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using Planmeca Romexis™ Imaging Software 2.2. RESULTS: The change in alveolar bone height and density between T0, T1 and T2 was significant in both groups. Alveolar bone height (h0, h1, h2) and vertical height of the grafted bone (g1, g2) in three lines (anterior, middle and posterior) were not significantly different between groups. The grafted bone height shrinkage (%) in the anterior, middle and posterior limits of the augmented area were not significantly different between groups. The existing alveolar and grafted bone density increased significantly in both groups between T1 and T2, except for the existing alveolar bone density in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the alveolar bone density values obtained in TI and T2 between groups, except for the existing alveolar bone density at T1. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show any significant positive effect for simvastatin in maxillary sinus augmentation based on radiographic examination. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6026100/ /pubmed/29971118 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yaghobee, Siamak Ghahroudi, Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Khorsand, Afshin Mahmoudi, Sanaz Rafiei, Sahar Chokami Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation |
title | Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation |
title_full | Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation |
title_fullStr | Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation |
title_short | Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation |
title_sort | radiographic comparison of bovine bone substitute alone versus bovine bone substitute and simvastatin for human maxillary sinus augmentation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaghobeesiamak radiographiccomparisonofbovinebonesubstitutealoneversusbovinebonesubstituteandsimvastatinforhumanmaxillarysinusaugmentation AT ghahroudiamiralirezarasouli radiographiccomparisonofbovinebonesubstitutealoneversusbovinebonesubstituteandsimvastatinforhumanmaxillarysinusaugmentation AT khorsandafshin radiographiccomparisonofbovinebonesubstitutealoneversusbovinebonesubstituteandsimvastatinforhumanmaxillarysinusaugmentation AT mahmoudisanaz radiographiccomparisonofbovinebonesubstitutealoneversusbovinebonesubstituteandsimvastatinforhumanmaxillarysinusaugmentation AT rafieisaharchokami radiographiccomparisonofbovinebonesubstitutealoneversusbovinebonesubstituteandsimvastatinforhumanmaxillarysinusaugmentation |