Cargando…

Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bovine bone substitute (Compact Bone B. ®) alone versus bovine bone substitute and simvastatin for human maxillary sinus augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 16 sinuses in eight patients. Radiographic assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaghobee, Siamak, Ghahroudi, Amir Ali Reza Rasouli, Khorsand, Afshin, Mahmoudi, Sanaz, Rafiei, Sahar Chokami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971118
_version_ 1783336384045514752
author Yaghobee, Siamak
Ghahroudi, Amir Ali Reza Rasouli
Khorsand, Afshin
Mahmoudi, Sanaz
Rafiei, Sahar Chokami
author_facet Yaghobee, Siamak
Ghahroudi, Amir Ali Reza Rasouli
Khorsand, Afshin
Mahmoudi, Sanaz
Rafiei, Sahar Chokami
author_sort Yaghobee, Siamak
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bovine bone substitute (Compact Bone B. ®) alone versus bovine bone substitute and simvastatin for human maxillary sinus augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 16 sinuses in eight patients. Radiographic assessments were done preoperatively (T0), immediately (T1) and at nine months after sinus grafting (T2). Alveolar bone height and density were assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using Planmeca Romexis™ Imaging Software 2.2. RESULTS: The change in alveolar bone height and density between T0, T1 and T2 was significant in both groups. Alveolar bone height (h0, h1, h2) and vertical height of the grafted bone (g1, g2) in three lines (anterior, middle and posterior) were not significantly different between groups. The grafted bone height shrinkage (%) in the anterior, middle and posterior limits of the augmented area were not significantly different between groups. The existing alveolar and grafted bone density increased significantly in both groups between T1 and T2, except for the existing alveolar bone density in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the alveolar bone density values obtained in TI and T2 between groups, except for the existing alveolar bone density at T1. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show any significant positive effect for simvastatin in maxillary sinus augmentation based on radiographic examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6026100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60261002018-07-03 Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Yaghobee, Siamak Ghahroudi, Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Khorsand, Afshin Mahmoudi, Sanaz Rafiei, Sahar Chokami J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bovine bone substitute (Compact Bone B. ®) alone versus bovine bone substitute and simvastatin for human maxillary sinus augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 16 sinuses in eight patients. Radiographic assessments were done preoperatively (T0), immediately (T1) and at nine months after sinus grafting (T2). Alveolar bone height and density were assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using Planmeca Romexis™ Imaging Software 2.2. RESULTS: The change in alveolar bone height and density between T0, T1 and T2 was significant in both groups. Alveolar bone height (h0, h1, h2) and vertical height of the grafted bone (g1, g2) in three lines (anterior, middle and posterior) were not significantly different between groups. The grafted bone height shrinkage (%) in the anterior, middle and posterior limits of the augmented area were not significantly different between groups. The existing alveolar and grafted bone density increased significantly in both groups between T1 and T2, except for the existing alveolar bone density in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the alveolar bone density values obtained in TI and T2 between groups, except for the existing alveolar bone density at T1. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show any significant positive effect for simvastatin in maxillary sinus augmentation based on radiographic examination. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6026100/ /pubmed/29971118 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yaghobee, Siamak
Ghahroudi, Amir Ali Reza Rasouli
Khorsand, Afshin
Mahmoudi, Sanaz
Rafiei, Sahar Chokami
Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
title Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
title_full Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
title_fullStr Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
title_short Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
title_sort radiographic comparison of bovine bone substitute alone versus bovine bone substitute and simvastatin for human maxillary sinus augmentation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971118
work_keys_str_mv AT yaghobeesiamak radiographiccomparisonofbovinebonesubstitutealoneversusbovinebonesubstituteandsimvastatinforhumanmaxillarysinusaugmentation
AT ghahroudiamiralirezarasouli radiographiccomparisonofbovinebonesubstitutealoneversusbovinebonesubstituteandsimvastatinforhumanmaxillarysinusaugmentation
AT khorsandafshin radiographiccomparisonofbovinebonesubstitutealoneversusbovinebonesubstituteandsimvastatinforhumanmaxillarysinusaugmentation
AT mahmoudisanaz radiographiccomparisonofbovinebonesubstitutealoneversusbovinebonesubstituteandsimvastatinforhumanmaxillarysinusaugmentation
AT rafieisaharchokami radiographiccomparisonofbovinebonesubstitutealoneversusbovinebonesubstituteandsimvastatinforhumanmaxillarysinusaugmentation