Cargando…

Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal

OBJECTIVES: Rebonding of isolated brackets is an economic option that can be conducted using available in-office or commercial recycling methods. Nowadays, lasers are known as an efficient modality for composite removal, but there is not much information available about using lasers for removal of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein, Hosseini, Mohammad Hashem, Chiniforoush, Nasim, Soudi, Armin, Moradi, Meisam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971122
_version_ 1783336385462140928
author Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein
Hosseini, Mohammad Hashem
Chiniforoush, Nasim
Soudi, Armin
Moradi, Meisam
author_facet Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein
Hosseini, Mohammad Hashem
Chiniforoush, Nasim
Soudi, Armin
Moradi, Meisam
author_sort Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Rebonding of isolated brackets is an economic option that can be conducted using available in-office or commercial recycling methods. Nowadays, lasers are known as an efficient modality for composite removal, but there is not much information available about using lasers for removal of adhesive remnants from the ceramic bracket base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty human premolar teeth were divided into five groups. Samples in all groups were bonded to ceramic brackets. Brackets in four groups were debonded and the remaining adhesive was removed by Er:YAG laser, Er;Cr:YSGG laser, sandblasting or direct flame. After removing adhesives from the tooth surfaces by carbide bur, the recycled brackets were bonded again. in the control group, new ceramic brackets were bonded. Finally, all brackets were debonded by universal testing machine and their shear bond strength (SBS) was measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was calculated under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification. Data were analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Tukey’s test. RESULTS: SRS values showed no significant difference among the five groups (P=0.568). The highest SRS was noted in the control group (7.46±1.4 MPa), followed by Er:YAG laser group (7.40±1.24 Mpa) and the lowest was noted in the flame group (6.32±2.3 Mpa). ARI scores indicated that most of the adhesive remained on the tooth surface in all groups CONCLUSIONS: Recycling of ceramic brackets with Er:YAG laser is an efficient in-office method which causes the least damage to the bracket base. However, all methods of bracket recycling showed acceptable SBS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6026106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60261062018-07-03 Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein Hosseini, Mohammad Hashem Chiniforoush, Nasim Soudi, Armin Moradi, Meisam J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: Rebonding of isolated brackets is an economic option that can be conducted using available in-office or commercial recycling methods. Nowadays, lasers are known as an efficient modality for composite removal, but there is not much information available about using lasers for removal of adhesive remnants from the ceramic bracket base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty human premolar teeth were divided into five groups. Samples in all groups were bonded to ceramic brackets. Brackets in four groups were debonded and the remaining adhesive was removed by Er:YAG laser, Er;Cr:YSGG laser, sandblasting or direct flame. After removing adhesives from the tooth surfaces by carbide bur, the recycled brackets were bonded again. in the control group, new ceramic brackets were bonded. Finally, all brackets were debonded by universal testing machine and their shear bond strength (SBS) was measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was calculated under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification. Data were analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Tukey’s test. RESULTS: SRS values showed no significant difference among the five groups (P=0.568). The highest SRS was noted in the control group (7.46±1.4 MPa), followed by Er:YAG laser group (7.40±1.24 Mpa) and the lowest was noted in the flame group (6.32±2.3 Mpa). ARI scores indicated that most of the adhesive remained on the tooth surface in all groups CONCLUSIONS: Recycling of ceramic brackets with Er:YAG laser is an efficient in-office method which causes the least damage to the bracket base. However, all methods of bracket recycling showed acceptable SBS. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6026106/ /pubmed/29971122 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein
Hosseini, Mohammad Hashem
Chiniforoush, Nasim
Soudi, Armin
Moradi, Meisam
Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal
title Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal
title_full Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal
title_fullStr Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal
title_full_unstemmed Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal
title_short Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal
title_sort shear bond strength of rebonded ceramic brackets using four different methods of adhesive removal
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971122
work_keys_str_mv AT mirhashemiamirhossein shearbondstrengthofrebondedceramicbracketsusingfourdifferentmethodsofadhesiveremoval
AT hosseinimohammadhashem shearbondstrengthofrebondedceramicbracketsusingfourdifferentmethodsofadhesiveremoval
AT chiniforoushnasim shearbondstrengthofrebondedceramicbracketsusingfourdifferentmethodsofadhesiveremoval
AT soudiarmin shearbondstrengthofrebondedceramicbracketsusingfourdifferentmethodsofadhesiveremoval
AT moradimeisam shearbondstrengthofrebondedceramicbracketsusingfourdifferentmethodsofadhesiveremoval