Cargando…
Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal
OBJECTIVES: Rebonding of isolated brackets is an economic option that can be conducted using available in-office or commercial recycling methods. Nowadays, lasers are known as an efficient modality for composite removal, but there is not much information available about using lasers for removal of a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971122 |
_version_ | 1783336385462140928 |
---|---|
author | Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein Hosseini, Mohammad Hashem Chiniforoush, Nasim Soudi, Armin Moradi, Meisam |
author_facet | Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein Hosseini, Mohammad Hashem Chiniforoush, Nasim Soudi, Armin Moradi, Meisam |
author_sort | Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Rebonding of isolated brackets is an economic option that can be conducted using available in-office or commercial recycling methods. Nowadays, lasers are known as an efficient modality for composite removal, but there is not much information available about using lasers for removal of adhesive remnants from the ceramic bracket base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty human premolar teeth were divided into five groups. Samples in all groups were bonded to ceramic brackets. Brackets in four groups were debonded and the remaining adhesive was removed by Er:YAG laser, Er;Cr:YSGG laser, sandblasting or direct flame. After removing adhesives from the tooth surfaces by carbide bur, the recycled brackets were bonded again. in the control group, new ceramic brackets were bonded. Finally, all brackets were debonded by universal testing machine and their shear bond strength (SBS) was measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was calculated under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification. Data were analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Tukey’s test. RESULTS: SRS values showed no significant difference among the five groups (P=0.568). The highest SRS was noted in the control group (7.46±1.4 MPa), followed by Er:YAG laser group (7.40±1.24 Mpa) and the lowest was noted in the flame group (6.32±2.3 Mpa). ARI scores indicated that most of the adhesive remained on the tooth surface in all groups CONCLUSIONS: Recycling of ceramic brackets with Er:YAG laser is an efficient in-office method which causes the least damage to the bracket base. However, all methods of bracket recycling showed acceptable SBS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6026106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60261062018-07-03 Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein Hosseini, Mohammad Hashem Chiniforoush, Nasim Soudi, Armin Moradi, Meisam J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: Rebonding of isolated brackets is an economic option that can be conducted using available in-office or commercial recycling methods. Nowadays, lasers are known as an efficient modality for composite removal, but there is not much information available about using lasers for removal of adhesive remnants from the ceramic bracket base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty human premolar teeth were divided into five groups. Samples in all groups were bonded to ceramic brackets. Brackets in four groups were debonded and the remaining adhesive was removed by Er:YAG laser, Er;Cr:YSGG laser, sandblasting or direct flame. After removing adhesives from the tooth surfaces by carbide bur, the recycled brackets were bonded again. in the control group, new ceramic brackets were bonded. Finally, all brackets were debonded by universal testing machine and their shear bond strength (SBS) was measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was calculated under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification. Data were analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Tukey’s test. RESULTS: SRS values showed no significant difference among the five groups (P=0.568). The highest SRS was noted in the control group (7.46±1.4 MPa), followed by Er:YAG laser group (7.40±1.24 Mpa) and the lowest was noted in the flame group (6.32±2.3 Mpa). ARI scores indicated that most of the adhesive remained on the tooth surface in all groups CONCLUSIONS: Recycling of ceramic brackets with Er:YAG laser is an efficient in-office method which causes the least damage to the bracket base. However, all methods of bracket recycling showed acceptable SBS. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6026106/ /pubmed/29971122 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mirhashemi, Amir Hossein Hosseini, Mohammad Hashem Chiniforoush, Nasim Soudi, Armin Moradi, Meisam Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal |
title | Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal |
title_full | Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal |
title_fullStr | Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal |
title_full_unstemmed | Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal |
title_short | Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal |
title_sort | shear bond strength of rebonded ceramic brackets using four different methods of adhesive removal |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mirhashemiamirhossein shearbondstrengthofrebondedceramicbracketsusingfourdifferentmethodsofadhesiveremoval AT hosseinimohammadhashem shearbondstrengthofrebondedceramicbracketsusingfourdifferentmethodsofadhesiveremoval AT chiniforoushnasim shearbondstrengthofrebondedceramicbracketsusingfourdifferentmethodsofadhesiveremoval AT soudiarmin shearbondstrengthofrebondedceramicbracketsusingfourdifferentmethodsofadhesiveremoval AT moradimeisam shearbondstrengthofrebondedceramicbracketsusingfourdifferentmethodsofadhesiveremoval |