Cargando…
A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation
Organ shortage leads to using non-optimal liver grafts. Thus, to determine the graft quality, the Donor Risk Index and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index have been proposed. In a previous study we showed that neither could be validated on the French database. Our aim was then dedicated to propose a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27960-7 |
_version_ | 1783336395854577664 |
---|---|
author | Winter, Audrey Féray, Cyrille Audureau, Etienne Azoulay, Daniel Antoine, Corinne Daurès, Jean-Pierre Landais, Paul |
author_facet | Winter, Audrey Féray, Cyrille Audureau, Etienne Azoulay, Daniel Antoine, Corinne Daurès, Jean-Pierre Landais, Paul |
author_sort | Winter, Audrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | Organ shortage leads to using non-optimal liver grafts. Thus, to determine the graft quality, the Donor Risk Index and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index have been proposed. In a previous study we showed that neither could be validated on the French database. Our aim was then dedicated to propose an adaptive Donor Quality Index (DQI) using data from 3961 liver transplantation (LT) performed in France between 2009 and 2013, with an external validation based on 1048 French LT performed in 2014. Using Cox models and three different methods of selection, we developed a new score and defined groups at risk. Model performance was assessed by means of three measures of discrimination corrected by the optimism using a bootstrap procedure. An external validation was also performed in order to evaluate its calibration and discrimination. Five donor covariates were retained: age, cause of death, intensive care unit stay, lowest MDRD creatinine clearance, and liver type. Three groups at risk could be discriminated. The performances of the model were satisfactory after internal validation. Calibration and discrimination were preserved in the external validation dataset. The DQI exhibited good properties and is potentially adaptive as an aid for better guiding decision making for LT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6026153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60261532018-07-09 A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation Winter, Audrey Féray, Cyrille Audureau, Etienne Azoulay, Daniel Antoine, Corinne Daurès, Jean-Pierre Landais, Paul Sci Rep Article Organ shortage leads to using non-optimal liver grafts. Thus, to determine the graft quality, the Donor Risk Index and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index have been proposed. In a previous study we showed that neither could be validated on the French database. Our aim was then dedicated to propose an adaptive Donor Quality Index (DQI) using data from 3961 liver transplantation (LT) performed in France between 2009 and 2013, with an external validation based on 1048 French LT performed in 2014. Using Cox models and three different methods of selection, we developed a new score and defined groups at risk. Model performance was assessed by means of three measures of discrimination corrected by the optimism using a bootstrap procedure. An external validation was also performed in order to evaluate its calibration and discrimination. Five donor covariates were retained: age, cause of death, intensive care unit stay, lowest MDRD creatinine clearance, and liver type. Three groups at risk could be discriminated. The performances of the model were satisfactory after internal validation. Calibration and discrimination were preserved in the external validation dataset. The DQI exhibited good properties and is potentially adaptive as an aid for better guiding decision making for LT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6026153/ /pubmed/29959344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27960-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Winter, Audrey Féray, Cyrille Audureau, Etienne Azoulay, Daniel Antoine, Corinne Daurès, Jean-Pierre Landais, Paul A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation |
title | A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation |
title_full | A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation |
title_fullStr | A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation |
title_short | A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation |
title_sort | donor quality index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27960-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT winteraudrey adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT feraycyrille adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT audureauetienne adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT azoulaydaniel adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT antoinecorinne adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT dauresjeanpierre adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT landaispaul adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT winteraudrey donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT feraycyrille donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT audureauetienne donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT azoulaydaniel donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT antoinecorinne donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT dauresjeanpierre donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation AT landaispaul donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation |