Cargando…

A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation

Organ shortage leads to using non-optimal liver grafts. Thus, to determine the graft quality, the Donor Risk Index and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index have been proposed. In a previous study we showed that neither could be validated on the French database. Our aim was then dedicated to propose a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winter, Audrey, Féray, Cyrille, Audureau, Etienne, Azoulay, Daniel, Antoine, Corinne, Daurès, Jean-Pierre, Landais, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27960-7
_version_ 1783336395854577664
author Winter, Audrey
Féray, Cyrille
Audureau, Etienne
Azoulay, Daniel
Antoine, Corinne
Daurès, Jean-Pierre
Landais, Paul
author_facet Winter, Audrey
Féray, Cyrille
Audureau, Etienne
Azoulay, Daniel
Antoine, Corinne
Daurès, Jean-Pierre
Landais, Paul
author_sort Winter, Audrey
collection PubMed
description Organ shortage leads to using non-optimal liver grafts. Thus, to determine the graft quality, the Donor Risk Index and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index have been proposed. In a previous study we showed that neither could be validated on the French database. Our aim was then dedicated to propose an adaptive Donor Quality Index (DQI) using data from 3961 liver transplantation (LT) performed in France between 2009 and 2013, with an external validation based on 1048 French LT performed in 2014. Using Cox models and three different methods of selection, we developed a new score and defined groups at risk. Model performance was assessed by means of three measures of discrimination corrected by the optimism using a bootstrap procedure. An external validation was also performed in order to evaluate its calibration and discrimination. Five donor covariates were retained: age, cause of death, intensive care unit stay, lowest MDRD creatinine clearance, and liver type. Three groups at risk could be discriminated. The performances of the model were satisfactory after internal validation. Calibration and discrimination were preserved in the external validation dataset. The DQI exhibited good properties and is potentially adaptive as an aid for better guiding decision making for LT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6026153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60261532018-07-09 A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation Winter, Audrey Féray, Cyrille Audureau, Etienne Azoulay, Daniel Antoine, Corinne Daurès, Jean-Pierre Landais, Paul Sci Rep Article Organ shortage leads to using non-optimal liver grafts. Thus, to determine the graft quality, the Donor Risk Index and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index have been proposed. In a previous study we showed that neither could be validated on the French database. Our aim was then dedicated to propose an adaptive Donor Quality Index (DQI) using data from 3961 liver transplantation (LT) performed in France between 2009 and 2013, with an external validation based on 1048 French LT performed in 2014. Using Cox models and three different methods of selection, we developed a new score and defined groups at risk. Model performance was assessed by means of three measures of discrimination corrected by the optimism using a bootstrap procedure. An external validation was also performed in order to evaluate its calibration and discrimination. Five donor covariates were retained: age, cause of death, intensive care unit stay, lowest MDRD creatinine clearance, and liver type. Three groups at risk could be discriminated. The performances of the model were satisfactory after internal validation. Calibration and discrimination were preserved in the external validation dataset. The DQI exhibited good properties and is potentially adaptive as an aid for better guiding decision making for LT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6026153/ /pubmed/29959344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27960-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Winter, Audrey
Féray, Cyrille
Audureau, Etienne
Azoulay, Daniel
Antoine, Corinne
Daurès, Jean-Pierre
Landais, Paul
A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation
title A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation
title_full A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation
title_fullStr A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation
title_full_unstemmed A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation
title_short A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation
title_sort donor quality index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27960-7
work_keys_str_mv AT winteraudrey adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT feraycyrille adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT audureauetienne adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT azoulaydaniel adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT antoinecorinne adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT dauresjeanpierre adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT landaispaul adonorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT winteraudrey donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT feraycyrille donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT audureauetienne donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT azoulaydaniel donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT antoinecorinne donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT dauresjeanpierre donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation
AT landaispaul donorqualityindexforlivertransplantationdevelopmentinternalandexternalvalidation