Cargando…

Intranasal Premedication Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam on the Behavior of 2-6-Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Clinic

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the intranasal premedication effect of newly introduced dexmedetomidine (DEX) versus midazolam on the behavior of uncooperative children in the dental clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This crossover double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 20 uncoop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahdavi, Alireza, Fallahinejad Ghajari, Masoud, Ansari, Ghassem, Shafiei, Leila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971125
_version_ 1783336418267889664
author Mahdavi, Alireza
Fallahinejad Ghajari, Masoud
Ansari, Ghassem
Shafiei, Leila
author_facet Mahdavi, Alireza
Fallahinejad Ghajari, Masoud
Ansari, Ghassem
Shafiei, Leila
author_sort Mahdavi, Alireza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the intranasal premedication effect of newly introduced dexmedetomidine (DEX) versus midazolam on the behavior of uncooperative children in the dental clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This crossover double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 20 uncooperative children aged 2–6 years who required at least two similar dental treatment visits. The subjects were randomly given 1 μg/kg of DEX and 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam via the intranasal route. For the sedation protocol in the two groups, 0.25 mg/kg of atropine in combination with 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam added to 1–2 mg/kg of ketamine were used 30 minutes after premedication and transferring the patient to the operating room. Dental treatments were carried out by a pediatric dentist blinded to the type of the administered premedication. The sedative efficacy (overall success rate) of the agents was assessed by two independent pediatric dentists based on the Houpt scale. Data analyses were carried out according to Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the premedication efficacy of intranasal DEX and midazolam according to the Houpt scale (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal midazolam and DEX are satisfactory and effective premedication regimens for uncooperative children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6026311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60263112018-07-03 Intranasal Premedication Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam on the Behavior of 2-6-Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Clinic Mahdavi, Alireza Fallahinejad Ghajari, Masoud Ansari, Ghassem Shafiei, Leila J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the intranasal premedication effect of newly introduced dexmedetomidine (DEX) versus midazolam on the behavior of uncooperative children in the dental clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This crossover double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 20 uncooperative children aged 2–6 years who required at least two similar dental treatment visits. The subjects were randomly given 1 μg/kg of DEX and 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam via the intranasal route. For the sedation protocol in the two groups, 0.25 mg/kg of atropine in combination with 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam added to 1–2 mg/kg of ketamine were used 30 minutes after premedication and transferring the patient to the operating room. Dental treatments were carried out by a pediatric dentist blinded to the type of the administered premedication. The sedative efficacy (overall success rate) of the agents was assessed by two independent pediatric dentists based on the Houpt scale. Data analyses were carried out according to Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the premedication efficacy of intranasal DEX and midazolam according to the Houpt scale (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal midazolam and DEX are satisfactory and effective premedication regimens for uncooperative children. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6026311/ /pubmed/29971125 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mahdavi, Alireza
Fallahinejad Ghajari, Masoud
Ansari, Ghassem
Shafiei, Leila
Intranasal Premedication Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam on the Behavior of 2-6-Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Clinic
title Intranasal Premedication Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam on the Behavior of 2-6-Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Clinic
title_full Intranasal Premedication Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam on the Behavior of 2-6-Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Clinic
title_fullStr Intranasal Premedication Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam on the Behavior of 2-6-Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Intranasal Premedication Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam on the Behavior of 2-6-Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Clinic
title_short Intranasal Premedication Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam on the Behavior of 2-6-Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Clinic
title_sort intranasal premedication effect of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam on the behavior of 2-6-year-old uncooperative children in dental clinic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971125
work_keys_str_mv AT mahdavialireza intranasalpremedicationeffectofdexmedetomidineversusmidazolamonthebehaviorof26yearolduncooperativechildrenindentalclinic
AT fallahinejadghajarimasoud intranasalpremedicationeffectofdexmedetomidineversusmidazolamonthebehaviorof26yearolduncooperativechildrenindentalclinic
AT ansarighassem intranasalpremedicationeffectofdexmedetomidineversusmidazolamonthebehaviorof26yearolduncooperativechildrenindentalclinic
AT shafieileila intranasalpremedicationeffectofdexmedetomidineversusmidazolamonthebehaviorof26yearolduncooperativechildrenindentalclinic