Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Retentive Properties of Two Compatible Ball Attachments in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVES: The retentive properties of implant-retained overdentures (IRO) may be influenced by the type of attachments. The aim of this research was to compare the retention of two dental implant systems with compatible ball attachments, namely Straumann® system (SS) and Rhein83 SRL system (RS) af...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Memarian, Maryam, Zarrati, Simindokht, Karimi, Sedigheh, Bahrami, Mehran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971128
_version_ 1783336418737651712
author Memarian, Maryam
Zarrati, Simindokht
Karimi, Sedigheh
Bahrami, Mehran
author_facet Memarian, Maryam
Zarrati, Simindokht
Karimi, Sedigheh
Bahrami, Mehran
author_sort Memarian, Maryam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The retentive properties of implant-retained overdentures (IRO) may be influenced by the type of attachments. The aim of this research was to compare the retention of two dental implant systems with compatible ball attachments, namely Straumann® system (SS) and Rhein83 SRL system (RS) after fatigue testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two laboratory models consisting of two parallel Straumann® fixtures at a distance of 22 mm were prepared. Five pairs of each systems’ ball attachments were examined (n=5). The samples were soaked in artificial saliva. The retention strength values (RSV) were recorded before the fatigue test and after 1100, 2200, 3300, 4400, and 5500 insertion and removal cycles at a speed of 51 mm/minute with a 50-N load cell in a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by independent sample t-test with Bonferroni corrections. RESULTS: There was a decrease in the RSV in both systems after 5500 cycles of insertion and removal. There was a significant statistical difference between the RSV of the normal Sphero Block of the RS (17.52±0.68 N) and that of the Spare Lamella retention inserts of the SS (19.72±0.74 N, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the RSVs of the RS and SS were almost similar before the fatigue test, as the number of insertion and removal cycles increased, the RSV decreased more significantly in the RS compared to the SS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6026313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60263132018-07-03 Comparative Evaluation of Retentive Properties of Two Compatible Ball Attachments in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study Memarian, Maryam Zarrati, Simindokht Karimi, Sedigheh Bahrami, Mehran J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The retentive properties of implant-retained overdentures (IRO) may be influenced by the type of attachments. The aim of this research was to compare the retention of two dental implant systems with compatible ball attachments, namely Straumann® system (SS) and Rhein83 SRL system (RS) after fatigue testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two laboratory models consisting of two parallel Straumann® fixtures at a distance of 22 mm were prepared. Five pairs of each systems’ ball attachments were examined (n=5). The samples were soaked in artificial saliva. The retention strength values (RSV) were recorded before the fatigue test and after 1100, 2200, 3300, 4400, and 5500 insertion and removal cycles at a speed of 51 mm/minute with a 50-N load cell in a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by independent sample t-test with Bonferroni corrections. RESULTS: There was a decrease in the RSV in both systems after 5500 cycles of insertion and removal. There was a significant statistical difference between the RSV of the normal Sphero Block of the RS (17.52±0.68 N) and that of the Spare Lamella retention inserts of the SS (19.72±0.74 N, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the RSVs of the RS and SS were almost similar before the fatigue test, as the number of insertion and removal cycles increased, the RSV decreased more significantly in the RS compared to the SS. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6026313/ /pubmed/29971128 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Memarian, Maryam
Zarrati, Simindokht
Karimi, Sedigheh
Bahrami, Mehran
Comparative Evaluation of Retentive Properties of Two Compatible Ball Attachments in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Retentive Properties of Two Compatible Ball Attachments in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Retentive Properties of Two Compatible Ball Attachments in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Retentive Properties of Two Compatible Ball Attachments in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Retentive Properties of Two Compatible Ball Attachments in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Retentive Properties of Two Compatible Ball Attachments in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of retentive properties of two compatible ball attachments in mandibular implant-retained overdentures: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971128
work_keys_str_mv AT memarianmaryam comparativeevaluationofretentivepropertiesoftwocompatibleballattachmentsinmandibularimplantretainedoverdenturesaninvitrostudy
AT zarratisimindokht comparativeevaluationofretentivepropertiesoftwocompatibleballattachmentsinmandibularimplantretainedoverdenturesaninvitrostudy
AT karimisedigheh comparativeevaluationofretentivepropertiesoftwocompatibleballattachmentsinmandibularimplantretainedoverdenturesaninvitrostudy
AT bahramimehran comparativeevaluationofretentivepropertiesoftwocompatibleballattachmentsinmandibularimplantretainedoverdenturesaninvitrostudy