Cargando…

Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis

BACKGROUND: The morphology of the retention tooth often does not correspond with the required design; hence there is often an indication for enamel recontouring or other restorative procedures. AIM: The study aimed to determine the impact of changing the path of insertion of the prosthesis by reshap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dastevski, Blagoja, Mijoska, Aneta, Kapusevska, Biljana, Gigovski, Nikola, Dimitrovski, Oliver, Spirov, Vanco, Korunovska-Stevkovska, Vesna, Petkov, Marjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Republic of Macedonia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.230
_version_ 1783336437204123648
author Dastevski, Blagoja
Mijoska, Aneta
Kapusevska, Biljana
Gigovski, Nikola
Dimitrovski, Oliver
Spirov, Vanco
Korunovska-Stevkovska, Vesna
Petkov, Marjan
author_facet Dastevski, Blagoja
Mijoska, Aneta
Kapusevska, Biljana
Gigovski, Nikola
Dimitrovski, Oliver
Spirov, Vanco
Korunovska-Stevkovska, Vesna
Petkov, Marjan
author_sort Dastevski, Blagoja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The morphology of the retention tooth often does not correspond with the required design; hence there is often an indication for enamel recontouring or other restorative procedures. AIM: The study aimed to determine the impact of changing the path of insertion of the prosthesis by reshaping the anatomical and morphological structures of the natural teeth predetermined for the retention of the prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The group of 40 patients with Class II, Subclass 1 according to Kennedy was formed, and 120 approximal surfaces of retention teeth were obtained. Two different types of prostheses were made on the models: one group in the zero point position of the model, and another group in the zero position of the model, with changing of the direction of input at an angle of 2°. RESULTS: The difference between the established and theoretical normal distribution of frequencies was tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Lilliefors tests (r < 0.10; r < 0.01). The first group showed a retention force of 0.08 N. In the second group the retention force was 0.94 N. CONCLUSION: It could be concluded that the change in the path of insertion of the dental prosthesis with conservative restorations as composite inlays, as well as the accurate extension of the prosthesis onto guiding plane surfaces, will undoubtedly increase the retention force of the prosthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6026413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Republic of Macedonia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60264132018-07-06 Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis Dastevski, Blagoja Mijoska, Aneta Kapusevska, Biljana Gigovski, Nikola Dimitrovski, Oliver Spirov, Vanco Korunovska-Stevkovska, Vesna Petkov, Marjan Open Access Maced J Med Sci Dental Science BACKGROUND: The morphology of the retention tooth often does not correspond with the required design; hence there is often an indication for enamel recontouring or other restorative procedures. AIM: The study aimed to determine the impact of changing the path of insertion of the prosthesis by reshaping the anatomical and morphological structures of the natural teeth predetermined for the retention of the prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The group of 40 patients with Class II, Subclass 1 according to Kennedy was formed, and 120 approximal surfaces of retention teeth were obtained. Two different types of prostheses were made on the models: one group in the zero point position of the model, and another group in the zero position of the model, with changing of the direction of input at an angle of 2°. RESULTS: The difference between the established and theoretical normal distribution of frequencies was tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Lilliefors tests (r < 0.10; r < 0.01). The first group showed a retention force of 0.08 N. In the second group the retention force was 0.94 N. CONCLUSION: It could be concluded that the change in the path of insertion of the dental prosthesis with conservative restorations as composite inlays, as well as the accurate extension of the prosthesis onto guiding plane surfaces, will undoubtedly increase the retention force of the prosthesis. Republic of Macedonia 2018-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6026413/ /pubmed/29983814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.230 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Blagoja Dastevski, Aneta Mijoska, Biljana Kapusevska, Nikola Gigovski, Oliver Dimitrovski, Vanco Spirov, Vesna Korunovska-Stevkovska, Marjan Petkov http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Dental Science
Dastevski, Blagoja
Mijoska, Aneta
Kapusevska, Biljana
Gigovski, Nikola
Dimitrovski, Oliver
Spirov, Vanco
Korunovska-Stevkovska, Vesna
Petkov, Marjan
Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis
title Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis
title_full Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis
title_fullStr Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis
title_short Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis
title_sort retention of approximal guiding plane surfaces in removable partial skeletal prosthesis
topic Dental Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.230
work_keys_str_mv AT dastevskiblagoja retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis
AT mijoskaaneta retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis
AT kapusevskabiljana retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis
AT gigovskinikola retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis
AT dimitrovskioliver retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis
AT spirovvanco retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis
AT korunovskastevkovskavesna retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis
AT petkovmarjan retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis