Cargando…
Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis
BACKGROUND: The morphology of the retention tooth often does not correspond with the required design; hence there is often an indication for enamel recontouring or other restorative procedures. AIM: The study aimed to determine the impact of changing the path of insertion of the prosthesis by reshap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Republic of Macedonia
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.230 |
_version_ | 1783336437204123648 |
---|---|
author | Dastevski, Blagoja Mijoska, Aneta Kapusevska, Biljana Gigovski, Nikola Dimitrovski, Oliver Spirov, Vanco Korunovska-Stevkovska, Vesna Petkov, Marjan |
author_facet | Dastevski, Blagoja Mijoska, Aneta Kapusevska, Biljana Gigovski, Nikola Dimitrovski, Oliver Spirov, Vanco Korunovska-Stevkovska, Vesna Petkov, Marjan |
author_sort | Dastevski, Blagoja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The morphology of the retention tooth often does not correspond with the required design; hence there is often an indication for enamel recontouring or other restorative procedures. AIM: The study aimed to determine the impact of changing the path of insertion of the prosthesis by reshaping the anatomical and morphological structures of the natural teeth predetermined for the retention of the prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The group of 40 patients with Class II, Subclass 1 according to Kennedy was formed, and 120 approximal surfaces of retention teeth were obtained. Two different types of prostheses were made on the models: one group in the zero point position of the model, and another group in the zero position of the model, with changing of the direction of input at an angle of 2°. RESULTS: The difference between the established and theoretical normal distribution of frequencies was tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Lilliefors tests (r < 0.10; r < 0.01). The first group showed a retention force of 0.08 N. In the second group the retention force was 0.94 N. CONCLUSION: It could be concluded that the change in the path of insertion of the dental prosthesis with conservative restorations as composite inlays, as well as the accurate extension of the prosthesis onto guiding plane surfaces, will undoubtedly increase the retention force of the prosthesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6026413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Republic of Macedonia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60264132018-07-06 Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis Dastevski, Blagoja Mijoska, Aneta Kapusevska, Biljana Gigovski, Nikola Dimitrovski, Oliver Spirov, Vanco Korunovska-Stevkovska, Vesna Petkov, Marjan Open Access Maced J Med Sci Dental Science BACKGROUND: The morphology of the retention tooth often does not correspond with the required design; hence there is often an indication for enamel recontouring or other restorative procedures. AIM: The study aimed to determine the impact of changing the path of insertion of the prosthesis by reshaping the anatomical and morphological structures of the natural teeth predetermined for the retention of the prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The group of 40 patients with Class II, Subclass 1 according to Kennedy was formed, and 120 approximal surfaces of retention teeth were obtained. Two different types of prostheses were made on the models: one group in the zero point position of the model, and another group in the zero position of the model, with changing of the direction of input at an angle of 2°. RESULTS: The difference between the established and theoretical normal distribution of frequencies was tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Lilliefors tests (r < 0.10; r < 0.01). The first group showed a retention force of 0.08 N. In the second group the retention force was 0.94 N. CONCLUSION: It could be concluded that the change in the path of insertion of the dental prosthesis with conservative restorations as composite inlays, as well as the accurate extension of the prosthesis onto guiding plane surfaces, will undoubtedly increase the retention force of the prosthesis. Republic of Macedonia 2018-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6026413/ /pubmed/29983814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.230 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Blagoja Dastevski, Aneta Mijoska, Biljana Kapusevska, Nikola Gigovski, Oliver Dimitrovski, Vanco Spirov, Vesna Korunovska-Stevkovska, Marjan Petkov http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Dental Science Dastevski, Blagoja Mijoska, Aneta Kapusevska, Biljana Gigovski, Nikola Dimitrovski, Oliver Spirov, Vanco Korunovska-Stevkovska, Vesna Petkov, Marjan Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis |
title | Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis |
title_full | Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis |
title_fullStr | Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis |
title_short | Retention of Approximal Guiding Plane Surfaces in Removable Partial Skeletal Prosthesis |
title_sort | retention of approximal guiding plane surfaces in removable partial skeletal prosthesis |
topic | Dental Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dastevskiblagoja retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis AT mijoskaaneta retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis AT kapusevskabiljana retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis AT gigovskinikola retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis AT dimitrovskioliver retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis AT spirovvanco retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis AT korunovskastevkovskavesna retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis AT petkovmarjan retentionofapproximalguidingplanesurfacesinremovablepartialskeletalprosthesis |