Cargando…
Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations
The rumen microbiome scientific community has utilized amplicon sequencing as an aid in identifying potential community compositional trends that could be used as an estimation of various production and performance traits including methane emission, animal protein production efficiency, and ruminant...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01365 |
_version_ | 1783336469864120320 |
---|---|
author | McGovern, Emily Waters, Sinéad M. Blackshields, Gordon McCabe, Matthew S. |
author_facet | McGovern, Emily Waters, Sinéad M. Blackshields, Gordon McCabe, Matthew S. |
author_sort | McGovern, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rumen microbiome scientific community has utilized amplicon sequencing as an aid in identifying potential community compositional trends that could be used as an estimation of various production and performance traits including methane emission, animal protein production efficiency, and ruminant health status. In order to translate rumen microbiome studies into executable application, there is a need for experimental and analytical concordance within the community. The objective of this study was to assess these factors in relation to selected currently established methods for 16S phylogenetic community analysis on a microbial community standard (MC) and a DNA standard (DS; ZymoBIOMICS(TM)). DNA was extracted from MC using the RBBC method commonly used for microbial DNA extraction from rumen digesta samples. 16S rRNA amplicon libraries were generated for the MC and DS using primers routinely used for rumen bacterial and archaeal community analysis. The primers targeted the V4 and V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and samples were subjected to both 20 and 28 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycles under identical cycle conditions. Sequencing was conducted using the Illumina MiSeq platform. As the bacteria contained in the microbial mock community were well-classified species, and for ease of explanation, we used the results of the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool classification to assess the DNA, PCR cycle number, and primer type. Sequence classification methodology was assessed independently. Spearman’s correlation analysis indicated that utilizing the repeated bead beating and column method for DNA extraction in combination with primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene using 20 first-round PCR cycles was sufficient for amplicon sequencing to generate a relatively accurate depiction of the bacterial communities present in rumen samples. These results also emphasize the requirement to develop and utilize positive mock community controls for all rumen microbiomic studies in order to discern errors which may arise at any step during a next-generation sequencing protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6026621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60266212018-07-09 Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations McGovern, Emily Waters, Sinéad M. Blackshields, Gordon McCabe, Matthew S. Front Microbiol Microbiology The rumen microbiome scientific community has utilized amplicon sequencing as an aid in identifying potential community compositional trends that could be used as an estimation of various production and performance traits including methane emission, animal protein production efficiency, and ruminant health status. In order to translate rumen microbiome studies into executable application, there is a need for experimental and analytical concordance within the community. The objective of this study was to assess these factors in relation to selected currently established methods for 16S phylogenetic community analysis on a microbial community standard (MC) and a DNA standard (DS; ZymoBIOMICS(TM)). DNA was extracted from MC using the RBBC method commonly used for microbial DNA extraction from rumen digesta samples. 16S rRNA amplicon libraries were generated for the MC and DS using primers routinely used for rumen bacterial and archaeal community analysis. The primers targeted the V4 and V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and samples were subjected to both 20 and 28 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycles under identical cycle conditions. Sequencing was conducted using the Illumina MiSeq platform. As the bacteria contained in the microbial mock community were well-classified species, and for ease of explanation, we used the results of the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool classification to assess the DNA, PCR cycle number, and primer type. Sequence classification methodology was assessed independently. Spearman’s correlation analysis indicated that utilizing the repeated bead beating and column method for DNA extraction in combination with primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene using 20 first-round PCR cycles was sufficient for amplicon sequencing to generate a relatively accurate depiction of the bacterial communities present in rumen samples. These results also emphasize the requirement to develop and utilize positive mock community controls for all rumen microbiomic studies in order to discern errors which may arise at any step during a next-generation sequencing protocol. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6026621/ /pubmed/29988486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01365 Text en Copyright © 2018 McGovern, Waters, Blackshields and McCabe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology McGovern, Emily Waters, Sinéad M. Blackshields, Gordon McCabe, Matthew S. Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations |
title | Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations |
title_full | Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations |
title_short | Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations |
title_sort | evaluating established methods for rumen 16s rrna amplicon sequencing with mock microbial populations |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgovernemily evaluatingestablishedmethodsforrumen16srrnaampliconsequencingwithmockmicrobialpopulations AT waterssineadm evaluatingestablishedmethodsforrumen16srrnaampliconsequencingwithmockmicrobialpopulations AT blackshieldsgordon evaluatingestablishedmethodsforrumen16srrnaampliconsequencingwithmockmicrobialpopulations AT mccabematthews evaluatingestablishedmethodsforrumen16srrnaampliconsequencingwithmockmicrobialpopulations |