Cargando…

Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations

The rumen microbiome scientific community has utilized amplicon sequencing as an aid in identifying potential community compositional trends that could be used as an estimation of various production and performance traits including methane emission, animal protein production efficiency, and ruminant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGovern, Emily, Waters, Sinéad M., Blackshields, Gordon, McCabe, Matthew S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01365
_version_ 1783336469864120320
author McGovern, Emily
Waters, Sinéad M.
Blackshields, Gordon
McCabe, Matthew S.
author_facet McGovern, Emily
Waters, Sinéad M.
Blackshields, Gordon
McCabe, Matthew S.
author_sort McGovern, Emily
collection PubMed
description The rumen microbiome scientific community has utilized amplicon sequencing as an aid in identifying potential community compositional trends that could be used as an estimation of various production and performance traits including methane emission, animal protein production efficiency, and ruminant health status. In order to translate rumen microbiome studies into executable application, there is a need for experimental and analytical concordance within the community. The objective of this study was to assess these factors in relation to selected currently established methods for 16S phylogenetic community analysis on a microbial community standard (MC) and a DNA standard (DS; ZymoBIOMICS(TM)). DNA was extracted from MC using the RBBC method commonly used for microbial DNA extraction from rumen digesta samples. 16S rRNA amplicon libraries were generated for the MC and DS using primers routinely used for rumen bacterial and archaeal community analysis. The primers targeted the V4 and V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and samples were subjected to both 20 and 28 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycles under identical cycle conditions. Sequencing was conducted using the Illumina MiSeq platform. As the bacteria contained in the microbial mock community were well-classified species, and for ease of explanation, we used the results of the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool classification to assess the DNA, PCR cycle number, and primer type. Sequence classification methodology was assessed independently. Spearman’s correlation analysis indicated that utilizing the repeated bead beating and column method for DNA extraction in combination with primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene using 20 first-round PCR cycles was sufficient for amplicon sequencing to generate a relatively accurate depiction of the bacterial communities present in rumen samples. These results also emphasize the requirement to develop and utilize positive mock community controls for all rumen microbiomic studies in order to discern errors which may arise at any step during a next-generation sequencing protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6026621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60266212018-07-09 Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations McGovern, Emily Waters, Sinéad M. Blackshields, Gordon McCabe, Matthew S. Front Microbiol Microbiology The rumen microbiome scientific community has utilized amplicon sequencing as an aid in identifying potential community compositional trends that could be used as an estimation of various production and performance traits including methane emission, animal protein production efficiency, and ruminant health status. In order to translate rumen microbiome studies into executable application, there is a need for experimental and analytical concordance within the community. The objective of this study was to assess these factors in relation to selected currently established methods for 16S phylogenetic community analysis on a microbial community standard (MC) and a DNA standard (DS; ZymoBIOMICS(TM)). DNA was extracted from MC using the RBBC method commonly used for microbial DNA extraction from rumen digesta samples. 16S rRNA amplicon libraries were generated for the MC and DS using primers routinely used for rumen bacterial and archaeal community analysis. The primers targeted the V4 and V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and samples were subjected to both 20 and 28 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycles under identical cycle conditions. Sequencing was conducted using the Illumina MiSeq platform. As the bacteria contained in the microbial mock community were well-classified species, and for ease of explanation, we used the results of the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool classification to assess the DNA, PCR cycle number, and primer type. Sequence classification methodology was assessed independently. Spearman’s correlation analysis indicated that utilizing the repeated bead beating and column method for DNA extraction in combination with primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene using 20 first-round PCR cycles was sufficient for amplicon sequencing to generate a relatively accurate depiction of the bacterial communities present in rumen samples. These results also emphasize the requirement to develop and utilize positive mock community controls for all rumen microbiomic studies in order to discern errors which may arise at any step during a next-generation sequencing protocol. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6026621/ /pubmed/29988486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01365 Text en Copyright © 2018 McGovern, Waters, Blackshields and McCabe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
McGovern, Emily
Waters, Sinéad M.
Blackshields, Gordon
McCabe, Matthew S.
Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations
title Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations
title_full Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations
title_fullStr Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations
title_short Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations
title_sort evaluating established methods for rumen 16s rrna amplicon sequencing with mock microbial populations
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01365
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgovernemily evaluatingestablishedmethodsforrumen16srrnaampliconsequencingwithmockmicrobialpopulations
AT waterssineadm evaluatingestablishedmethodsforrumen16srrnaampliconsequencingwithmockmicrobialpopulations
AT blackshieldsgordon evaluatingestablishedmethodsforrumen16srrnaampliconsequencingwithmockmicrobialpopulations
AT mccabematthews evaluatingestablishedmethodsforrumen16srrnaampliconsequencingwithmockmicrobialpopulations