Cargando…
Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments
Background: There is a growing move to provide care for premature infants in a single family, private room neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in place of the traditional shared space, open bay NICU. The resultant effect on the developing neonatal microbiota is unknown. Study Design: Stool and groin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01361 |
_version_ | 1783336473309741056 |
---|---|
author | Hourigan, Suchitra K. Subramanian, Poorani Hasan, Nur A. Ta, Allison Klein, Elisabeth Chettout, Nassim Huddleston, Kathi Deopujari, Varsha Levy, Shira Baveja, Rajiv Clemency, Nicole C. Baker, Robin L. Niederhuber, John E. Colwell, Rita R. |
author_facet | Hourigan, Suchitra K. Subramanian, Poorani Hasan, Nur A. Ta, Allison Klein, Elisabeth Chettout, Nassim Huddleston, Kathi Deopujari, Varsha Levy, Shira Baveja, Rajiv Clemency, Nicole C. Baker, Robin L. Niederhuber, John E. Colwell, Rita R. |
author_sort | Hourigan, Suchitra K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: There is a growing move to provide care for premature infants in a single family, private room neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in place of the traditional shared space, open bay NICU. The resultant effect on the developing neonatal microbiota is unknown. Study Design: Stool and groin skin swabs were collected from infants in a shared-space NICU (old NICU) and a single-family room NICU (new NICU) on the same hospital campus. Metagenomic sequencing was performed and data analyzed by CosmosID bioinformatics software package. Results: There were no significant differences between the cohorts in gestational age, length of stay, and delivery mode; infants in the old NICU received significantly more antibiotics (p = 0.03). Differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence associated genes were found between the cohorts in stool and skin, with more differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes in the new NICU. The entire bacterial microbiota analyzed to the genus level significantly differed between cohorts in skin (p = 0.0001) but not in stool samples. There was no difference in alpha diversity between the two cohorts. DNA viruses and fungi were detected but did not differ between cohorts. Conclusion: Differences were seen in the resistome and virulome between the two cohorts with more differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes in the new NICU. This highlights the influence that different NICU environments can have on the neonatal microbiota. Whether the differences were due to the new NICU being a single-family NICU or located in a newly constructed building warrants exploration. Long term health outcomes from the differences observed must be followed longitudinally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6026636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60266362018-07-09 Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments Hourigan, Suchitra K. Subramanian, Poorani Hasan, Nur A. Ta, Allison Klein, Elisabeth Chettout, Nassim Huddleston, Kathi Deopujari, Varsha Levy, Shira Baveja, Rajiv Clemency, Nicole C. Baker, Robin L. Niederhuber, John E. Colwell, Rita R. Front Microbiol Microbiology Background: There is a growing move to provide care for premature infants in a single family, private room neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in place of the traditional shared space, open bay NICU. The resultant effect on the developing neonatal microbiota is unknown. Study Design: Stool and groin skin swabs were collected from infants in a shared-space NICU (old NICU) and a single-family room NICU (new NICU) on the same hospital campus. Metagenomic sequencing was performed and data analyzed by CosmosID bioinformatics software package. Results: There were no significant differences between the cohorts in gestational age, length of stay, and delivery mode; infants in the old NICU received significantly more antibiotics (p = 0.03). Differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence associated genes were found between the cohorts in stool and skin, with more differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes in the new NICU. The entire bacterial microbiota analyzed to the genus level significantly differed between cohorts in skin (p = 0.0001) but not in stool samples. There was no difference in alpha diversity between the two cohorts. DNA viruses and fungi were detected but did not differ between cohorts. Conclusion: Differences were seen in the resistome and virulome between the two cohorts with more differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes in the new NICU. This highlights the influence that different NICU environments can have on the neonatal microbiota. Whether the differences were due to the new NICU being a single-family NICU or located in a newly constructed building warrants exploration. Long term health outcomes from the differences observed must be followed longitudinally. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6026636/ /pubmed/29988506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01361 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hourigan, Subramanian, Hasan, Ta, Klein, Chettout, Huddleston, Deopujari, Levy, Baveja, Clemency, Baker, Niederhuber and Colwell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Hourigan, Suchitra K. Subramanian, Poorani Hasan, Nur A. Ta, Allison Klein, Elisabeth Chettout, Nassim Huddleston, Kathi Deopujari, Varsha Levy, Shira Baveja, Rajiv Clemency, Nicole C. Baker, Robin L. Niederhuber, John E. Colwell, Rita R. Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments |
title | Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments |
title_full | Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments |
title_short | Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments |
title_sort | comparison of infant gut and skin microbiota, resistome and virulome between neonatal intensive care unit (nicu) environments |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01361 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hourigansuchitrak comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT subramanianpoorani comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT hasannura comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT taallison comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT kleinelisabeth comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT chettoutnassim comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT huddlestonkathi comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT deopujarivarsha comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT levyshira comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT bavejarajiv comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT clemencynicolec comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT bakerrobinl comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT niederhuberjohne comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments AT colwellritar comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments |