Cargando…

Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments

Background: There is a growing move to provide care for premature infants in a single family, private room neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in place of the traditional shared space, open bay NICU. The resultant effect on the developing neonatal microbiota is unknown. Study Design: Stool and groin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hourigan, Suchitra K., Subramanian, Poorani, Hasan, Nur A., Ta, Allison, Klein, Elisabeth, Chettout, Nassim, Huddleston, Kathi, Deopujari, Varsha, Levy, Shira, Baveja, Rajiv, Clemency, Nicole C., Baker, Robin L., Niederhuber, John E., Colwell, Rita R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01361
_version_ 1783336473309741056
author Hourigan, Suchitra K.
Subramanian, Poorani
Hasan, Nur A.
Ta, Allison
Klein, Elisabeth
Chettout, Nassim
Huddleston, Kathi
Deopujari, Varsha
Levy, Shira
Baveja, Rajiv
Clemency, Nicole C.
Baker, Robin L.
Niederhuber, John E.
Colwell, Rita R.
author_facet Hourigan, Suchitra K.
Subramanian, Poorani
Hasan, Nur A.
Ta, Allison
Klein, Elisabeth
Chettout, Nassim
Huddleston, Kathi
Deopujari, Varsha
Levy, Shira
Baveja, Rajiv
Clemency, Nicole C.
Baker, Robin L.
Niederhuber, John E.
Colwell, Rita R.
author_sort Hourigan, Suchitra K.
collection PubMed
description Background: There is a growing move to provide care for premature infants in a single family, private room neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in place of the traditional shared space, open bay NICU. The resultant effect on the developing neonatal microbiota is unknown. Study Design: Stool and groin skin swabs were collected from infants in a shared-space NICU (old NICU) and a single-family room NICU (new NICU) on the same hospital campus. Metagenomic sequencing was performed and data analyzed by CosmosID bioinformatics software package. Results: There were no significant differences between the cohorts in gestational age, length of stay, and delivery mode; infants in the old NICU received significantly more antibiotics (p = 0.03). Differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence associated genes were found between the cohorts in stool and skin, with more differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes in the new NICU. The entire bacterial microbiota analyzed to the genus level significantly differed between cohorts in skin (p = 0.0001) but not in stool samples. There was no difference in alpha diversity between the two cohorts. DNA viruses and fungi were detected but did not differ between cohorts. Conclusion: Differences were seen in the resistome and virulome between the two cohorts with more differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes in the new NICU. This highlights the influence that different NICU environments can have on the neonatal microbiota. Whether the differences were due to the new NICU being a single-family NICU or located in a newly constructed building warrants exploration. Long term health outcomes from the differences observed must be followed longitudinally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6026636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60266362018-07-09 Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments Hourigan, Suchitra K. Subramanian, Poorani Hasan, Nur A. Ta, Allison Klein, Elisabeth Chettout, Nassim Huddleston, Kathi Deopujari, Varsha Levy, Shira Baveja, Rajiv Clemency, Nicole C. Baker, Robin L. Niederhuber, John E. Colwell, Rita R. Front Microbiol Microbiology Background: There is a growing move to provide care for premature infants in a single family, private room neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in place of the traditional shared space, open bay NICU. The resultant effect on the developing neonatal microbiota is unknown. Study Design: Stool and groin skin swabs were collected from infants in a shared-space NICU (old NICU) and a single-family room NICU (new NICU) on the same hospital campus. Metagenomic sequencing was performed and data analyzed by CosmosID bioinformatics software package. Results: There were no significant differences between the cohorts in gestational age, length of stay, and delivery mode; infants in the old NICU received significantly more antibiotics (p = 0.03). Differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence associated genes were found between the cohorts in stool and skin, with more differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes in the new NICU. The entire bacterial microbiota analyzed to the genus level significantly differed between cohorts in skin (p = 0.0001) but not in stool samples. There was no difference in alpha diversity between the two cohorts. DNA viruses and fungi were detected but did not differ between cohorts. Conclusion: Differences were seen in the resistome and virulome between the two cohorts with more differentially abundant antimicrobial resistance genes in the new NICU. This highlights the influence that different NICU environments can have on the neonatal microbiota. Whether the differences were due to the new NICU being a single-family NICU or located in a newly constructed building warrants exploration. Long term health outcomes from the differences observed must be followed longitudinally. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6026636/ /pubmed/29988506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01361 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hourigan, Subramanian, Hasan, Ta, Klein, Chettout, Huddleston, Deopujari, Levy, Baveja, Clemency, Baker, Niederhuber and Colwell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Hourigan, Suchitra K.
Subramanian, Poorani
Hasan, Nur A.
Ta, Allison
Klein, Elisabeth
Chettout, Nassim
Huddleston, Kathi
Deopujari, Varsha
Levy, Shira
Baveja, Rajiv
Clemency, Nicole C.
Baker, Robin L.
Niederhuber, John E.
Colwell, Rita R.
Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments
title Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments
title_full Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments
title_fullStr Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments
title_short Comparison of Infant Gut and Skin Microbiota, Resistome and Virulome Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Environments
title_sort comparison of infant gut and skin microbiota, resistome and virulome between neonatal intensive care unit (nicu) environments
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01361
work_keys_str_mv AT hourigansuchitrak comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT subramanianpoorani comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT hasannura comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT taallison comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT kleinelisabeth comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT chettoutnassim comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT huddlestonkathi comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT deopujarivarsha comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT levyshira comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT bavejarajiv comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT clemencynicolec comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT bakerrobinl comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT niederhuberjohne comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments
AT colwellritar comparisonofinfantgutandskinmicrobiotaresistomeandvirulomebetweenneonatalintensivecareunitnicuenvironments