Cargando…

Specific breast cancer prognosis‐subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns

Tumour heterogeneity is an obstacle to effective breast cancer diagnosis and therapy. DNA methylation is an important regulator of gene expression, thus characterizing tumour heterogeneity by epigenetic features can be clinically informative. In this study, we explored specific prognosis‐subtypes ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Shumei, Wang, Yihan, Gu, Yue, Zhu, Jiang, Ci, Ce, Guo, Zhongfu, Chen, Chuangeng, Wei, Yanjun, Lv, Wenhua, Liu, Hongbo, Zhang, Dongwei, Zhang, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29675884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12309
_version_ 1783336516568743936
author Zhang, Shumei
Wang, Yihan
Gu, Yue
Zhu, Jiang
Ci, Ce
Guo, Zhongfu
Chen, Chuangeng
Wei, Yanjun
Lv, Wenhua
Liu, Hongbo
Zhang, Dongwei
Zhang, Yan
author_facet Zhang, Shumei
Wang, Yihan
Gu, Yue
Zhu, Jiang
Ci, Ce
Guo, Zhongfu
Chen, Chuangeng
Wei, Yanjun
Lv, Wenhua
Liu, Hongbo
Zhang, Dongwei
Zhang, Yan
author_sort Zhang, Shumei
collection PubMed
description Tumour heterogeneity is an obstacle to effective breast cancer diagnosis and therapy. DNA methylation is an important regulator of gene expression, thus characterizing tumour heterogeneity by epigenetic features can be clinically informative. In this study, we explored specific prognosis‐subtypes based on DNA methylation status using 669 breast cancers from the TCGA database. Nine subgroups were distinguished by consensus clustering using 3869 CpGs that significantly influenced survival. The specific DNA methylation patterns were reflected by different races, ages, tumour stages, receptor status, histological types, metastasis status and prognosis. Compared with the PAM50 subtypes, which use gene expression clustering, DNA methylation subtypes were more elaborate and classified the Basal‐like subtype into two different prognosis‐subgroups. Additionally, 1252 CpGs (corresponding to 888 genes) were identified as specific hyper/hypomethylation sites for each specific subgroup. Finally, a prognosis model based on Bayesian network classification was constructed and used to classify the test set into DNA methylation subgroups, which corresponded to the classification results of the train set. These specific classifications by DNA methylation can explain the heterogeneity of previous molecular subgroups in breast cancer and will help in the development of personalized treatments for the new specific subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6026876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60268762018-07-09 Specific breast cancer prognosis‐subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns Zhang, Shumei Wang, Yihan Gu, Yue Zhu, Jiang Ci, Ce Guo, Zhongfu Chen, Chuangeng Wei, Yanjun Lv, Wenhua Liu, Hongbo Zhang, Dongwei Zhang, Yan Mol Oncol Research Articles Tumour heterogeneity is an obstacle to effective breast cancer diagnosis and therapy. DNA methylation is an important regulator of gene expression, thus characterizing tumour heterogeneity by epigenetic features can be clinically informative. In this study, we explored specific prognosis‐subtypes based on DNA methylation status using 669 breast cancers from the TCGA database. Nine subgroups were distinguished by consensus clustering using 3869 CpGs that significantly influenced survival. The specific DNA methylation patterns were reflected by different races, ages, tumour stages, receptor status, histological types, metastasis status and prognosis. Compared with the PAM50 subtypes, which use gene expression clustering, DNA methylation subtypes were more elaborate and classified the Basal‐like subtype into two different prognosis‐subgroups. Additionally, 1252 CpGs (corresponding to 888 genes) were identified as specific hyper/hypomethylation sites for each specific subgroup. Finally, a prognosis model based on Bayesian network classification was constructed and used to classify the test set into DNA methylation subgroups, which corresponded to the classification results of the train set. These specific classifications by DNA methylation can explain the heterogeneity of previous molecular subgroups in breast cancer and will help in the development of personalized treatments for the new specific subtypes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-21 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6026876/ /pubmed/29675884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12309 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Zhang, Shumei
Wang, Yihan
Gu, Yue
Zhu, Jiang
Ci, Ce
Guo, Zhongfu
Chen, Chuangeng
Wei, Yanjun
Lv, Wenhua
Liu, Hongbo
Zhang, Dongwei
Zhang, Yan
Specific breast cancer prognosis‐subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns
title Specific breast cancer prognosis‐subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns
title_full Specific breast cancer prognosis‐subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns
title_fullStr Specific breast cancer prognosis‐subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns
title_full_unstemmed Specific breast cancer prognosis‐subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns
title_short Specific breast cancer prognosis‐subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns
title_sort specific breast cancer prognosis‐subtype distinctions based on dna methylation patterns
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29675884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12309
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangshumei specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT wangyihan specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT guyue specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT zhujiang specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT cice specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT guozhongfu specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT chenchuangeng specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT weiyanjun specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT lvwenhua specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT liuhongbo specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT zhangdongwei specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns
AT zhangyan specificbreastcancerprognosissubtypedistinctionsbasedondnamethylationpatterns