Cargando…

Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production

Recombinant protein production emerged in the early 1980s with the development of genetic engineering tools, which represented a compelling alternative to protein extraction from natural sources. Over the years, a high level of heterologous protein was made possible in a variety of hosts ranging fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton, Souza Carmo, Talita, Silva Carvalho, Lucas, Mendonça Bahia, Frederico, Parachin, Nádia Skorupa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29710826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6020038
_version_ 1783336573927948288
author Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton
Souza Carmo, Talita
Silva Carvalho, Lucas
Mendonça Bahia, Frederico
Parachin, Nádia Skorupa
author_facet Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton
Souza Carmo, Talita
Silva Carvalho, Lucas
Mendonça Bahia, Frederico
Parachin, Nádia Skorupa
author_sort Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton
collection PubMed
description Recombinant protein production emerged in the early 1980s with the development of genetic engineering tools, which represented a compelling alternative to protein extraction from natural sources. Over the years, a high level of heterologous protein was made possible in a variety of hosts ranging from the bacteria Escherichia coli to mammalian cells. Recombinant protein importance is represented by its market size, which reached $1654 million in 2016 and is expected to reach $2850.5 million by 2022. Among the available hosts, yeasts have been used for producing a great variety of proteins applied to chemicals, fuels, food, and pharmaceuticals, being one of the most used hosts for recombinant production nowadays. Historically, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the dominant yeast host for heterologous protein production. Lately, other yeasts such as Komagataella sp., Kluyveromyces lactis, and Yarrowia lipolytica have emerged as advantageous hosts. In this review, a comparative analysis is done listing the advantages and disadvantages of using each host regarding the availability of genetic tools, strategies for cultivation in bioreactors, and the main techniques utilized for protein purification. Finally, examples of each host will be discussed regarding the total amount of protein recovered and its bioactivity due to correct folding and glycosylation patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6027275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60272752018-07-13 Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton Souza Carmo, Talita Silva Carvalho, Lucas Mendonça Bahia, Frederico Parachin, Nádia Skorupa Microorganisms Review Recombinant protein production emerged in the early 1980s with the development of genetic engineering tools, which represented a compelling alternative to protein extraction from natural sources. Over the years, a high level of heterologous protein was made possible in a variety of hosts ranging from the bacteria Escherichia coli to mammalian cells. Recombinant protein importance is represented by its market size, which reached $1654 million in 2016 and is expected to reach $2850.5 million by 2022. Among the available hosts, yeasts have been used for producing a great variety of proteins applied to chemicals, fuels, food, and pharmaceuticals, being one of the most used hosts for recombinant production nowadays. Historically, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the dominant yeast host for heterologous protein production. Lately, other yeasts such as Komagataella sp., Kluyveromyces lactis, and Yarrowia lipolytica have emerged as advantageous hosts. In this review, a comparative analysis is done listing the advantages and disadvantages of using each host regarding the availability of genetic tools, strategies for cultivation in bioreactors, and the main techniques utilized for protein purification. Finally, examples of each host will be discussed regarding the total amount of protein recovered and its bioactivity due to correct folding and glycosylation patterns. MDPI 2018-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6027275/ /pubmed/29710826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6020038 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton
Souza Carmo, Talita
Silva Carvalho, Lucas
Mendonça Bahia, Frederico
Parachin, Nádia Skorupa
Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production
title Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production
title_full Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production
title_fullStr Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production
title_short Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production
title_sort comparison of yeasts as hosts for recombinant protein production
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29710826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6020038
work_keys_str_mv AT vieiragomesantoniomilton comparisonofyeastsashostsforrecombinantproteinproduction
AT souzacarmotalita comparisonofyeastsashostsforrecombinantproteinproduction
AT silvacarvalholucas comparisonofyeastsashostsforrecombinantproteinproduction
AT mendoncabahiafrederico comparisonofyeastsashostsforrecombinantproteinproduction
AT parachinnadiaskorupa comparisonofyeastsashostsforrecombinantproteinproduction