Cargando…
Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production
Recombinant protein production emerged in the early 1980s with the development of genetic engineering tools, which represented a compelling alternative to protein extraction from natural sources. Over the years, a high level of heterologous protein was made possible in a variety of hosts ranging fro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29710826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6020038 |
_version_ | 1783336573927948288 |
---|---|
author | Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton Souza Carmo, Talita Silva Carvalho, Lucas Mendonça Bahia, Frederico Parachin, Nádia Skorupa |
author_facet | Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton Souza Carmo, Talita Silva Carvalho, Lucas Mendonça Bahia, Frederico Parachin, Nádia Skorupa |
author_sort | Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recombinant protein production emerged in the early 1980s with the development of genetic engineering tools, which represented a compelling alternative to protein extraction from natural sources. Over the years, a high level of heterologous protein was made possible in a variety of hosts ranging from the bacteria Escherichia coli to mammalian cells. Recombinant protein importance is represented by its market size, which reached $1654 million in 2016 and is expected to reach $2850.5 million by 2022. Among the available hosts, yeasts have been used for producing a great variety of proteins applied to chemicals, fuels, food, and pharmaceuticals, being one of the most used hosts for recombinant production nowadays. Historically, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the dominant yeast host for heterologous protein production. Lately, other yeasts such as Komagataella sp., Kluyveromyces lactis, and Yarrowia lipolytica have emerged as advantageous hosts. In this review, a comparative analysis is done listing the advantages and disadvantages of using each host regarding the availability of genetic tools, strategies for cultivation in bioreactors, and the main techniques utilized for protein purification. Finally, examples of each host will be discussed regarding the total amount of protein recovered and its bioactivity due to correct folding and glycosylation patterns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6027275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60272752018-07-13 Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton Souza Carmo, Talita Silva Carvalho, Lucas Mendonça Bahia, Frederico Parachin, Nádia Skorupa Microorganisms Review Recombinant protein production emerged in the early 1980s with the development of genetic engineering tools, which represented a compelling alternative to protein extraction from natural sources. Over the years, a high level of heterologous protein was made possible in a variety of hosts ranging from the bacteria Escherichia coli to mammalian cells. Recombinant protein importance is represented by its market size, which reached $1654 million in 2016 and is expected to reach $2850.5 million by 2022. Among the available hosts, yeasts have been used for producing a great variety of proteins applied to chemicals, fuels, food, and pharmaceuticals, being one of the most used hosts for recombinant production nowadays. Historically, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the dominant yeast host for heterologous protein production. Lately, other yeasts such as Komagataella sp., Kluyveromyces lactis, and Yarrowia lipolytica have emerged as advantageous hosts. In this review, a comparative analysis is done listing the advantages and disadvantages of using each host regarding the availability of genetic tools, strategies for cultivation in bioreactors, and the main techniques utilized for protein purification. Finally, examples of each host will be discussed regarding the total amount of protein recovered and its bioactivity due to correct folding and glycosylation patterns. MDPI 2018-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6027275/ /pubmed/29710826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6020038 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Vieira Gomes, Antonio Milton Souza Carmo, Talita Silva Carvalho, Lucas Mendonça Bahia, Frederico Parachin, Nádia Skorupa Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production |
title | Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production |
title_full | Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production |
title_short | Comparison of Yeasts as Hosts for Recombinant Protein Production |
title_sort | comparison of yeasts as hosts for recombinant protein production |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29710826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6020038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vieiragomesantoniomilton comparisonofyeastsashostsforrecombinantproteinproduction AT souzacarmotalita comparisonofyeastsashostsforrecombinantproteinproduction AT silvacarvalholucas comparisonofyeastsashostsforrecombinantproteinproduction AT mendoncabahiafrederico comparisonofyeastsashostsforrecombinantproteinproduction AT parachinnadiaskorupa comparisonofyeastsashostsforrecombinantproteinproduction |