Cargando…

A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study

The intermittent manner of surfing accentuates the importance of both the aerobic and anaerobic energy systems. Currently, the optimal method of assessing surfing-specific aerobic fitness is using a swim bench (SWB) ergometer; however, their limited availability presents a barrier to surfers wanting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khundaqji, Hamzeh, Samain, Enad, Climstein, Mike, Schram, Ben, Hing, Wayne, Furness, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6020054
_version_ 1783336638559027200
author Khundaqji, Hamzeh
Samain, Enad
Climstein, Mike
Schram, Ben
Hing, Wayne
Furness, James
author_facet Khundaqji, Hamzeh
Samain, Enad
Climstein, Mike
Schram, Ben
Hing, Wayne
Furness, James
author_sort Khundaqji, Hamzeh
collection PubMed
description The intermittent manner of surfing accentuates the importance of both the aerobic and anaerobic energy systems. Currently, the optimal method of assessing surfing-specific aerobic fitness is using a swim bench (SWB) ergometer; however, their limited availability presents a barrier to surfers wanting to know their maximal aerobic power (VO(2peak)). As a result, the aims of this pilot study were to determine the VO(2peak) of recreational surfers using a new commercial SWB ergometer and to propose and examine the feasibility of a regression model to predict SWB ergometer VO(2peak) values. A total of nine recreational surfers were assessed where body measurements were conducted followed by maximal aerobic capacity testing (swim bench and treadmill) to profile the cohort. Findings demonstrated that VO(2peak) values were significantly greater (p < 0.001) on the treadmill compared to the SWB ergometer (M = 66.01 ± 8.23 vs. 37.41 ± 8.73 mL/kg/min). Peak heart rate was also significantly greater on the treadmill compared to the SWB ergometer. Multiple regression analysis was used to produce a model which predicted SWB VO(2peak) values with an R(2) value of 0.863 and an adjusted R(2) value of 0.726. The physiological profiling of the recreational cohort coupled with a surfer’s predicted SWB VO(2peak) value will allow for identification of surfing-specific aerobic fitness levels and evidence-based training recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6027552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60275522018-07-13 A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study Khundaqji, Hamzeh Samain, Enad Climstein, Mike Schram, Ben Hing, Wayne Furness, James Sports (Basel) Article The intermittent manner of surfing accentuates the importance of both the aerobic and anaerobic energy systems. Currently, the optimal method of assessing surfing-specific aerobic fitness is using a swim bench (SWB) ergometer; however, their limited availability presents a barrier to surfers wanting to know their maximal aerobic power (VO(2peak)). As a result, the aims of this pilot study were to determine the VO(2peak) of recreational surfers using a new commercial SWB ergometer and to propose and examine the feasibility of a regression model to predict SWB ergometer VO(2peak) values. A total of nine recreational surfers were assessed where body measurements were conducted followed by maximal aerobic capacity testing (swim bench and treadmill) to profile the cohort. Findings demonstrated that VO(2peak) values were significantly greater (p < 0.001) on the treadmill compared to the SWB ergometer (M = 66.01 ± 8.23 vs. 37.41 ± 8.73 mL/kg/min). Peak heart rate was also significantly greater on the treadmill compared to the SWB ergometer. Multiple regression analysis was used to produce a model which predicted SWB VO(2peak) values with an R(2) value of 0.863 and an adjusted R(2) value of 0.726. The physiological profiling of the recreational cohort coupled with a surfer’s predicted SWB VO(2peak) value will allow for identification of surfing-specific aerobic fitness levels and evidence-based training recommendations. MDPI 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6027552/ /pubmed/29910358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6020054 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Khundaqji, Hamzeh
Samain, Enad
Climstein, Mike
Schram, Ben
Hing, Wayne
Furness, James
A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study
title A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study
title_full A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study
title_short A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study
title_sort comparison of aerobic fitness testing on a swim bench and treadmill in a recreational surfing cohort: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6020054
work_keys_str_mv AT khundaqjihamzeh acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT samainenad acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT climsteinmike acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT schramben acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT hingwayne acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT furnessjames acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT khundaqjihamzeh comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT samainenad comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT climsteinmike comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT schramben comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT hingwayne comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy
AT furnessjames comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy