Cargando…
A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study
The intermittent manner of surfing accentuates the importance of both the aerobic and anaerobic energy systems. Currently, the optimal method of assessing surfing-specific aerobic fitness is using a swim bench (SWB) ergometer; however, their limited availability presents a barrier to surfers wanting...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6020054 |
_version_ | 1783336638559027200 |
---|---|
author | Khundaqji, Hamzeh Samain, Enad Climstein, Mike Schram, Ben Hing, Wayne Furness, James |
author_facet | Khundaqji, Hamzeh Samain, Enad Climstein, Mike Schram, Ben Hing, Wayne Furness, James |
author_sort | Khundaqji, Hamzeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | The intermittent manner of surfing accentuates the importance of both the aerobic and anaerobic energy systems. Currently, the optimal method of assessing surfing-specific aerobic fitness is using a swim bench (SWB) ergometer; however, their limited availability presents a barrier to surfers wanting to know their maximal aerobic power (VO(2peak)). As a result, the aims of this pilot study were to determine the VO(2peak) of recreational surfers using a new commercial SWB ergometer and to propose and examine the feasibility of a regression model to predict SWB ergometer VO(2peak) values. A total of nine recreational surfers were assessed where body measurements were conducted followed by maximal aerobic capacity testing (swim bench and treadmill) to profile the cohort. Findings demonstrated that VO(2peak) values were significantly greater (p < 0.001) on the treadmill compared to the SWB ergometer (M = 66.01 ± 8.23 vs. 37.41 ± 8.73 mL/kg/min). Peak heart rate was also significantly greater on the treadmill compared to the SWB ergometer. Multiple regression analysis was used to produce a model which predicted SWB VO(2peak) values with an R(2) value of 0.863 and an adjusted R(2) value of 0.726. The physiological profiling of the recreational cohort coupled with a surfer’s predicted SWB VO(2peak) value will allow for identification of surfing-specific aerobic fitness levels and evidence-based training recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6027552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60275522018-07-13 A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study Khundaqji, Hamzeh Samain, Enad Climstein, Mike Schram, Ben Hing, Wayne Furness, James Sports (Basel) Article The intermittent manner of surfing accentuates the importance of both the aerobic and anaerobic energy systems. Currently, the optimal method of assessing surfing-specific aerobic fitness is using a swim bench (SWB) ergometer; however, their limited availability presents a barrier to surfers wanting to know their maximal aerobic power (VO(2peak)). As a result, the aims of this pilot study were to determine the VO(2peak) of recreational surfers using a new commercial SWB ergometer and to propose and examine the feasibility of a regression model to predict SWB ergometer VO(2peak) values. A total of nine recreational surfers were assessed where body measurements were conducted followed by maximal aerobic capacity testing (swim bench and treadmill) to profile the cohort. Findings demonstrated that VO(2peak) values were significantly greater (p < 0.001) on the treadmill compared to the SWB ergometer (M = 66.01 ± 8.23 vs. 37.41 ± 8.73 mL/kg/min). Peak heart rate was also significantly greater on the treadmill compared to the SWB ergometer. Multiple regression analysis was used to produce a model which predicted SWB VO(2peak) values with an R(2) value of 0.863 and an adjusted R(2) value of 0.726. The physiological profiling of the recreational cohort coupled with a surfer’s predicted SWB VO(2peak) value will allow for identification of surfing-specific aerobic fitness levels and evidence-based training recommendations. MDPI 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6027552/ /pubmed/29910358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6020054 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Khundaqji, Hamzeh Samain, Enad Climstein, Mike Schram, Ben Hing, Wayne Furness, James A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study |
title | A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study |
title_full | A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study |
title_short | A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | comparison of aerobic fitness testing on a swim bench and treadmill in a recreational surfing cohort: a pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6020054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khundaqjihamzeh acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT samainenad acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT climsteinmike acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT schramben acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT hingwayne acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT furnessjames acomparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT khundaqjihamzeh comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT samainenad comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT climsteinmike comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT schramben comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT hingwayne comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy AT furnessjames comparisonofaerobicfitnesstestingonaswimbenchandtreadmillinarecreationalsurfingcohortapilotstudy |