Cargando…

Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment for overactive bladder: An observational study

PURPOSE: Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment (IVES) has been successfully used to treat neurogenic bladder. We report the results of an observational study regarding the use of IVES for women with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and/or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). MATERIALS AND ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yune, J. Joshua, Shen, Jim K., Pierce, Matthew A., Hardesty, Jeffrey S., Kim, Joo, Siddighi, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29984339
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2018.59.4.246
_version_ 1783336767469912064
author Yune, J. Joshua
Shen, Jim K.
Pierce, Matthew A.
Hardesty, Jeffrey S.
Kim, Joo
Siddighi, Sam
author_facet Yune, J. Joshua
Shen, Jim K.
Pierce, Matthew A.
Hardesty, Jeffrey S.
Kim, Joo
Siddighi, Sam
author_sort Yune, J. Joshua
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment (IVES) has been successfully used to treat neurogenic bladder. We report the results of an observational study regarding the use of IVES for women with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and/or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: IVES was performed in women with OAB (defined by frequency ≥8/day, nocturia ≥2/night, or ≥3 episodes of UUI on 3-day voiding diary) who failed prior medical therapy. Subjects underwent 4 weeks of treatment with an 8-Fr Detruset™ IVES catheter. Primary outcome was Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short Form OAB Questionnaire (OAB-q SF), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), reduction in frequency and UUI on voiding diary, and adverse effects. Analysis was done with paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS: Seventeen subjects completed the study. At 4 weeks post-treatment, 15 improved on PGI-I (11 subjects: ‘a little better’, 2: ‘much better’, 2: ‘very much better’). There were significant improvements in symptom bother and health-related quality of life as measured by OAB-q SF and pelvic organ prolapse and urinary distress as measured by PFDI. Frequency decreased from 10.3±4.3 at baseline to 8.9±2.3 (p=0.04) at 3 months. No pain was reported during treatment. There was one urinary tract infection during the study period. No other adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: IVES appears to be a safe and effective novel treatment for OAB. Larger comparative studies are needed to investigate its potential for long-term treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6028462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60284622018-07-07 Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment for overactive bladder: An observational study Yune, J. Joshua Shen, Jim K. Pierce, Matthew A. Hardesty, Jeffrey S. Kim, Joo Siddighi, Sam Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment (IVES) has been successfully used to treat neurogenic bladder. We report the results of an observational study regarding the use of IVES for women with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and/or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: IVES was performed in women with OAB (defined by frequency ≥8/day, nocturia ≥2/night, or ≥3 episodes of UUI on 3-day voiding diary) who failed prior medical therapy. Subjects underwent 4 weeks of treatment with an 8-Fr Detruset™ IVES catheter. Primary outcome was Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short Form OAB Questionnaire (OAB-q SF), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), reduction in frequency and UUI on voiding diary, and adverse effects. Analysis was done with paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS: Seventeen subjects completed the study. At 4 weeks post-treatment, 15 improved on PGI-I (11 subjects: ‘a little better’, 2: ‘much better’, 2: ‘very much better’). There were significant improvements in symptom bother and health-related quality of life as measured by OAB-q SF and pelvic organ prolapse and urinary distress as measured by PFDI. Frequency decreased from 10.3±4.3 at baseline to 8.9±2.3 (p=0.04) at 3 months. No pain was reported during treatment. There was one urinary tract infection during the study period. No other adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: IVES appears to be a safe and effective novel treatment for OAB. Larger comparative studies are needed to investigate its potential for long-term treatment. The Korean Urological Association 2018-07 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6028462/ /pubmed/29984339 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2018.59.4.246 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yune, J. Joshua
Shen, Jim K.
Pierce, Matthew A.
Hardesty, Jeffrey S.
Kim, Joo
Siddighi, Sam
Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment for overactive bladder: An observational study
title Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment for overactive bladder: An observational study
title_full Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment for overactive bladder: An observational study
title_fullStr Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment for overactive bladder: An observational study
title_full_unstemmed Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment for overactive bladder: An observational study
title_short Intravesical electrical stimulation treatment for overactive bladder: An observational study
title_sort intravesical electrical stimulation treatment for overactive bladder: an observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29984339
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2018.59.4.246
work_keys_str_mv AT yunejjoshua intravesicalelectricalstimulationtreatmentforoveractivebladderanobservationalstudy
AT shenjimk intravesicalelectricalstimulationtreatmentforoveractivebladderanobservationalstudy
AT piercematthewa intravesicalelectricalstimulationtreatmentforoveractivebladderanobservationalstudy
AT hardestyjeffreys intravesicalelectricalstimulationtreatmentforoveractivebladderanobservationalstudy
AT kimjoo intravesicalelectricalstimulationtreatmentforoveractivebladderanobservationalstudy
AT siddighisam intravesicalelectricalstimulationtreatmentforoveractivebladderanobservationalstudy