Cargando…

How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of ADC measurements in vitro and in cervical lymph nodes of healthy volunteers. METHODS: We used a GE 1.5 T MRI scanner and a first ice-water phantom according to recommendations released by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) for assessing ADC aga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreau, Bastien, Iannessi, Antoine, Hoog, Christopher, Beaumont, Hubert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29476218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5265-2
_version_ 1783336852511522816
author Moreau, Bastien
Iannessi, Antoine
Hoog, Christopher
Beaumont, Hubert
author_facet Moreau, Bastien
Iannessi, Antoine
Hoog, Christopher
Beaumont, Hubert
author_sort Moreau, Bastien
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of ADC measurements in vitro and in cervical lymph nodes of healthy volunteers. METHODS: We used a GE 1.5 T MRI scanner and a first ice-water phantom according to recommendations released by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) for assessing ADC against reference values. We analysed the target size effect by using a second phantom made of six inserted spheres with diameters ranging from 10 to 37 mm. Thirteen healthy volunteers were also scanned to assess the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of volumetric ADC measurements of cervical lymph nodes. RESULTS: On the ice-water phantom, the error in ADC measurements was less than 4.3 %. The spatial bias due to the non-linearity of gradient fields was found to be 24 % at 8 cm from the isocentre. ADC measure reliability decreased when addressing small targets due to partial volume effects (up to 12.8 %). The mean ADC value of cervical lymph nodes was 0.87.10(-3) ± 0.12.10(-3) mm(2)/s with a good intra-observer reliability. Inter-observer reproducibility featured a bias of -5.5 % due to segmentation issues. CONCLUSION: ADC is a potentially important imaging biomarker in oncology; however, variability issues preclude its broader adoption. Reliable use of ADC requires technical advances and systematic quality control. KEY POINTS: • ADC is a promising quantitative imaging biomarker. • ADC has a fair inter-reader variability and good intra-reader variability. • Partial volume effect, post-processing software and non-linearity of scanners are limiting factors. • No threshold values for detecting cervical lymph node malignancy can be drawn. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-017-5265-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6028847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60288472018-07-23 How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes Moreau, Bastien Iannessi, Antoine Hoog, Christopher Beaumont, Hubert Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of ADC measurements in vitro and in cervical lymph nodes of healthy volunteers. METHODS: We used a GE 1.5 T MRI scanner and a first ice-water phantom according to recommendations released by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) for assessing ADC against reference values. We analysed the target size effect by using a second phantom made of six inserted spheres with diameters ranging from 10 to 37 mm. Thirteen healthy volunteers were also scanned to assess the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of volumetric ADC measurements of cervical lymph nodes. RESULTS: On the ice-water phantom, the error in ADC measurements was less than 4.3 %. The spatial bias due to the non-linearity of gradient fields was found to be 24 % at 8 cm from the isocentre. ADC measure reliability decreased when addressing small targets due to partial volume effects (up to 12.8 %). The mean ADC value of cervical lymph nodes was 0.87.10(-3) ± 0.12.10(-3) mm(2)/s with a good intra-observer reliability. Inter-observer reproducibility featured a bias of -5.5 % due to segmentation issues. CONCLUSION: ADC is a potentially important imaging biomarker in oncology; however, variability issues preclude its broader adoption. Reliable use of ADC requires technical advances and systematic quality control. KEY POINTS: • ADC is a promising quantitative imaging biomarker. • ADC has a fair inter-reader variability and good intra-reader variability. • Partial volume effect, post-processing software and non-linearity of scanners are limiting factors. • No threshold values for detecting cervical lymph node malignancy can be drawn. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-017-5265-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-02-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6028847/ /pubmed/29476218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5265-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Moreau, Bastien
Iannessi, Antoine
Hoog, Christopher
Beaumont, Hubert
How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes
title How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes
title_full How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes
title_fullStr How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes
title_full_unstemmed How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes
title_short How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes
title_sort how reliable are adc measurements? a phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29476218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5265-2
work_keys_str_mv AT moreaubastien howreliableareadcmeasurementsaphantomandclinicalstudyofcervicallymphnodes
AT iannessiantoine howreliableareadcmeasurementsaphantomandclinicalstudyofcervicallymphnodes
AT hoogchristopher howreliableareadcmeasurementsaphantomandclinicalstudyofcervicallymphnodes
AT beaumonthubert howreliableareadcmeasurementsaphantomandclinicalstudyofcervicallymphnodes