Cargando…
How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of ADC measurements in vitro and in cervical lymph nodes of healthy volunteers. METHODS: We used a GE 1.5 T MRI scanner and a first ice-water phantom according to recommendations released by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) for assessing ADC aga...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29476218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5265-2 |
_version_ | 1783336852511522816 |
---|---|
author | Moreau, Bastien Iannessi, Antoine Hoog, Christopher Beaumont, Hubert |
author_facet | Moreau, Bastien Iannessi, Antoine Hoog, Christopher Beaumont, Hubert |
author_sort | Moreau, Bastien |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of ADC measurements in vitro and in cervical lymph nodes of healthy volunteers. METHODS: We used a GE 1.5 T MRI scanner and a first ice-water phantom according to recommendations released by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) for assessing ADC against reference values. We analysed the target size effect by using a second phantom made of six inserted spheres with diameters ranging from 10 to 37 mm. Thirteen healthy volunteers were also scanned to assess the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of volumetric ADC measurements of cervical lymph nodes. RESULTS: On the ice-water phantom, the error in ADC measurements was less than 4.3 %. The spatial bias due to the non-linearity of gradient fields was found to be 24 % at 8 cm from the isocentre. ADC measure reliability decreased when addressing small targets due to partial volume effects (up to 12.8 %). The mean ADC value of cervical lymph nodes was 0.87.10(-3) ± 0.12.10(-3) mm(2)/s with a good intra-observer reliability. Inter-observer reproducibility featured a bias of -5.5 % due to segmentation issues. CONCLUSION: ADC is a potentially important imaging biomarker in oncology; however, variability issues preclude its broader adoption. Reliable use of ADC requires technical advances and systematic quality control. KEY POINTS: • ADC is a promising quantitative imaging biomarker. • ADC has a fair inter-reader variability and good intra-reader variability. • Partial volume effect, post-processing software and non-linearity of scanners are limiting factors. • No threshold values for detecting cervical lymph node malignancy can be drawn. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-017-5265-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6028847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60288472018-07-23 How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes Moreau, Bastien Iannessi, Antoine Hoog, Christopher Beaumont, Hubert Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of ADC measurements in vitro and in cervical lymph nodes of healthy volunteers. METHODS: We used a GE 1.5 T MRI scanner and a first ice-water phantom according to recommendations released by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) for assessing ADC against reference values. We analysed the target size effect by using a second phantom made of six inserted spheres with diameters ranging from 10 to 37 mm. Thirteen healthy volunteers were also scanned to assess the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of volumetric ADC measurements of cervical lymph nodes. RESULTS: On the ice-water phantom, the error in ADC measurements was less than 4.3 %. The spatial bias due to the non-linearity of gradient fields was found to be 24 % at 8 cm from the isocentre. ADC measure reliability decreased when addressing small targets due to partial volume effects (up to 12.8 %). The mean ADC value of cervical lymph nodes was 0.87.10(-3) ± 0.12.10(-3) mm(2)/s with a good intra-observer reliability. Inter-observer reproducibility featured a bias of -5.5 % due to segmentation issues. CONCLUSION: ADC is a potentially important imaging biomarker in oncology; however, variability issues preclude its broader adoption. Reliable use of ADC requires technical advances and systematic quality control. KEY POINTS: • ADC is a promising quantitative imaging biomarker. • ADC has a fair inter-reader variability and good intra-reader variability. • Partial volume effect, post-processing software and non-linearity of scanners are limiting factors. • No threshold values for detecting cervical lymph node malignancy can be drawn. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-017-5265-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-02-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6028847/ /pubmed/29476218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5265-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Magnetic Resonance Moreau, Bastien Iannessi, Antoine Hoog, Christopher Beaumont, Hubert How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes |
title | How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes |
title_full | How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes |
title_fullStr | How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes |
title_full_unstemmed | How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes |
title_short | How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes |
title_sort | how reliable are adc measurements? a phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes |
topic | Magnetic Resonance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29476218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5265-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moreaubastien howreliableareadcmeasurementsaphantomandclinicalstudyofcervicallymphnodes AT iannessiantoine howreliableareadcmeasurementsaphantomandclinicalstudyofcervicallymphnodes AT hoogchristopher howreliableareadcmeasurementsaphantomandclinicalstudyofcervicallymphnodes AT beaumonthubert howreliableareadcmeasurementsaphantomandclinicalstudyofcervicallymphnodes |