Cargando…
Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and magnetisation transfer imaging (MTI) compared to standard MRI for prostate cancer assessment in a re-biopsy population. METHODS: Thirty-patients were imaged at 3 T including DKI (K(app) and D(app)) with b-values 150/450/800/1150/1500 s/mm(2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5169-1 |
_version_ | 1783336855106748416 |
---|---|
author | Barrett, Tristan McLean, Mary Priest, Andrew N. Lawrence, Edward M. Patterson, Andrew J. Koo, Brendan C. Patterson, Ilse Warren, Anne Y. Doble, Andrew Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. Kastner, Christof Gallagher, Ferdia A. |
author_facet | Barrett, Tristan McLean, Mary Priest, Andrew N. Lawrence, Edward M. Patterson, Andrew J. Koo, Brendan C. Patterson, Ilse Warren, Anne Y. Doble, Andrew Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. Kastner, Christof Gallagher, Ferdia A. |
author_sort | Barrett, Tristan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and magnetisation transfer imaging (MTI) compared to standard MRI for prostate cancer assessment in a re-biopsy population. METHODS: Thirty-patients were imaged at 3 T including DKI (K(app) and D(app)) with b-values 150/450/800/1150/1500 s/mm(2) and MTI performed with and without MT saturation. Patients underwent transperineal biopsy based on prospectively defined MRI targets. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed the parameters and Wilcoxon-signed ranked test assessed relationships between metrics. RESULTS: Twenty patients had ≥ 1 core positive for cancer in a total of 26 MRI targets (Gleason 3+3 in 8, 3+4 in 12, ≥ 4+3 in 6): 13 peripheral (PZ) and 13 transition zone (TZ). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and D(app) were significantly lower and the K(app) and MT ratio (MTR) significantly higher in tumour versus benign tissue (all p ≤ 0.005); ROC values 0.767-1.000. Normal TZ had: lower ADC and D(app) and higher K(app) and MTR compared to normal PZ. MTR showed a moderate correlation to K(app) (r = 0.570) and D(app) (r = -0.537) in normal tissue but a poor correlation in tumours. No parameter separated low-grade (Gleason 3+3) from high-grade (≥ 3+4) disease for either PZ (p = 0.414-0.825) or TZ (p = 0.148-0.825). CONCLUSION: ADC, D(app), K(app) and MTR all distinguished benign tissue from tumour, but none reliably differentiated low- from high-grade disease. KEY POINTS: • MTR was significantly higher in PZ and TZ tumours versus normal tissue • K (app) was significantly lower and D (app) higher for PZ and TZ tumours • There was no incremental value for DKI/MTI over mono-exponential ADC parameters • No parameter could consistently differentiate low-grade (Gleason 3+3) from high-grade (≥ 3+4) disease • Divergent MTR/DKI values in TZ tumours suggests they offer different functional information ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-017-5169-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6028858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60288582018-07-23 Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population Barrett, Tristan McLean, Mary Priest, Andrew N. Lawrence, Edward M. Patterson, Andrew J. Koo, Brendan C. Patterson, Ilse Warren, Anne Y. Doble, Andrew Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. Kastner, Christof Gallagher, Ferdia A. Eur Radiol Urogenital OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and magnetisation transfer imaging (MTI) compared to standard MRI for prostate cancer assessment in a re-biopsy population. METHODS: Thirty-patients were imaged at 3 T including DKI (K(app) and D(app)) with b-values 150/450/800/1150/1500 s/mm(2) and MTI performed with and without MT saturation. Patients underwent transperineal biopsy based on prospectively defined MRI targets. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed the parameters and Wilcoxon-signed ranked test assessed relationships between metrics. RESULTS: Twenty patients had ≥ 1 core positive for cancer in a total of 26 MRI targets (Gleason 3+3 in 8, 3+4 in 12, ≥ 4+3 in 6): 13 peripheral (PZ) and 13 transition zone (TZ). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and D(app) were significantly lower and the K(app) and MT ratio (MTR) significantly higher in tumour versus benign tissue (all p ≤ 0.005); ROC values 0.767-1.000. Normal TZ had: lower ADC and D(app) and higher K(app) and MTR compared to normal PZ. MTR showed a moderate correlation to K(app) (r = 0.570) and D(app) (r = -0.537) in normal tissue but a poor correlation in tumours. No parameter separated low-grade (Gleason 3+3) from high-grade (≥ 3+4) disease for either PZ (p = 0.414-0.825) or TZ (p = 0.148-0.825). CONCLUSION: ADC, D(app), K(app) and MTR all distinguished benign tissue from tumour, but none reliably differentiated low- from high-grade disease. KEY POINTS: • MTR was significantly higher in PZ and TZ tumours versus normal tissue • K (app) was significantly lower and D (app) higher for PZ and TZ tumours • There was no incremental value for DKI/MTI over mono-exponential ADC parameters • No parameter could consistently differentiate low-grade (Gleason 3+3) from high-grade (≥ 3+4) disease • Divergent MTR/DKI values in TZ tumours suggests they offer different functional information ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-017-5169-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-12-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6028858/ /pubmed/29222677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5169-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Urogenital Barrett, Tristan McLean, Mary Priest, Andrew N. Lawrence, Edward M. Patterson, Andrew J. Koo, Brendan C. Patterson, Ilse Warren, Anne Y. Doble, Andrew Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. Kastner, Christof Gallagher, Ferdia A. Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population |
title | Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population |
title_full | Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population |
title_short | Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population |
title_sort | diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population |
topic | Urogenital |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5169-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barretttristan diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT mcleanmary diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT priestandrewn diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT lawrenceedwardm diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT pattersonandrewj diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT koobrendanc diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT pattersonilse diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT warrenanney diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT dobleandrew diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT gnanapragasamvincentj diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT kastnerchristof diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation AT gallagherferdiaa diagnosticevaluationofmagnetizationtransferanddiffusionkurtosisimagingforprostatecancerdetectioninarebiopsypopulation |