Cargando…

The Memokath-051 Stent for the Treatment of Ureteric Obstruction: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance

Memokath-051 is a thermo-expandable, nickel-titanium alloy spiral stent used to treat ureteric obstruction resulting from malignant or benign strictures. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) selected Memokath-051 for evaluation. The company, PNN Medical, claimed Memokath-051...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eaton Turner, Emily, Jenks, Michelle, McCool, Rachael, Marshall, Chris, Millar, Liesl, Wood, Hannah, Peel, Alison, Craig, Joyce, Sims, Andrew J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0389-3
_version_ 1783336858634158080
author Eaton Turner, Emily
Jenks, Michelle
McCool, Rachael
Marshall, Chris
Millar, Liesl
Wood, Hannah
Peel, Alison
Craig, Joyce
Sims, Andrew J
author_facet Eaton Turner, Emily
Jenks, Michelle
McCool, Rachael
Marshall, Chris
Millar, Liesl
Wood, Hannah
Peel, Alison
Craig, Joyce
Sims, Andrew J
author_sort Eaton Turner, Emily
collection PubMed
description Memokath-051 is a thermo-expandable, nickel-titanium alloy spiral stent used to treat ureteric obstruction resulting from malignant or benign strictures. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) selected Memokath-051 for evaluation. The company, PNN Medical, claimed Memokath-051 has clinical superiority and cost savings compared with double-J stents. It identified five studies reporting clinical evidence on Memokath-051 and constructed a de novo cost model comparing Memokath-051 to double-J stents. Results indicated that Memokath-051 generated cost savings of £4156 per patient over 2.5 years. The External Assessment Centre (EAC) critiqued the company’s submission and completed substantial additional work. Sixteen studies were identified assessing Memokath-051 and all listed comparators in the scope (double-J stents, reconstructive surgery and metallic and alloy stents) except nephrostomy. Similar success rates were reported for Memokath-051 compared with double-J and Resonance stents and worse outcomes compared with other options with evidence available. The EAC updated the company’s cost model structure and modified several inputs. The EAC’s model estimated that Memokath-051 generated savings of at least £1619 per patient over 5 years compared with double-J stents, was cost neutral compared with other metallic stents and was cost saving compared with surgery up to month 55. Overall, Memokath-051 is likely to be cost saving in patients not indicated for reconstructive surgery and those expected to require a ureteral stent for at least 30 months. The Medical Technologies Advisory Committee (MTAC) reviewed the evidence and supported the case for adoption, issuing partially supportive recommendations published after public consultation as Medical Technologies Guidance 35. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40258-018-0389-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6028873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60288732018-07-23 The Memokath-051 Stent for the Treatment of Ureteric Obstruction: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance Eaton Turner, Emily Jenks, Michelle McCool, Rachael Marshall, Chris Millar, Liesl Wood, Hannah Peel, Alison Craig, Joyce Sims, Andrew J Appl Health Econ Health Policy Review Article Memokath-051 is a thermo-expandable, nickel-titanium alloy spiral stent used to treat ureteric obstruction resulting from malignant or benign strictures. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) selected Memokath-051 for evaluation. The company, PNN Medical, claimed Memokath-051 has clinical superiority and cost savings compared with double-J stents. It identified five studies reporting clinical evidence on Memokath-051 and constructed a de novo cost model comparing Memokath-051 to double-J stents. Results indicated that Memokath-051 generated cost savings of £4156 per patient over 2.5 years. The External Assessment Centre (EAC) critiqued the company’s submission and completed substantial additional work. Sixteen studies were identified assessing Memokath-051 and all listed comparators in the scope (double-J stents, reconstructive surgery and metallic and alloy stents) except nephrostomy. Similar success rates were reported for Memokath-051 compared with double-J and Resonance stents and worse outcomes compared with other options with evidence available. The EAC updated the company’s cost model structure and modified several inputs. The EAC’s model estimated that Memokath-051 generated savings of at least £1619 per patient over 5 years compared with double-J stents, was cost neutral compared with other metallic stents and was cost saving compared with surgery up to month 55. Overall, Memokath-051 is likely to be cost saving in patients not indicated for reconstructive surgery and those expected to require a ureteral stent for at least 30 months. The Medical Technologies Advisory Committee (MTAC) reviewed the evidence and supported the case for adoption, issuing partially supportive recommendations published after public consultation as Medical Technologies Guidance 35. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40258-018-0389-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-04-03 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6028873/ /pubmed/29616460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0389-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Eaton Turner, Emily
Jenks, Michelle
McCool, Rachael
Marshall, Chris
Millar, Liesl
Wood, Hannah
Peel, Alison
Craig, Joyce
Sims, Andrew J
The Memokath-051 Stent for the Treatment of Ureteric Obstruction: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
title The Memokath-051 Stent for the Treatment of Ureteric Obstruction: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
title_full The Memokath-051 Stent for the Treatment of Ureteric Obstruction: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
title_fullStr The Memokath-051 Stent for the Treatment of Ureteric Obstruction: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
title_full_unstemmed The Memokath-051 Stent for the Treatment of Ureteric Obstruction: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
title_short The Memokath-051 Stent for the Treatment of Ureteric Obstruction: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
title_sort memokath-051 stent for the treatment of ureteric obstruction: a nice medical technology guidance
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0389-3
work_keys_str_mv AT eatonturneremily thememokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT jenksmichelle thememokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT mccoolrachael thememokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT marshallchris thememokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT millarliesl thememokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT woodhannah thememokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT peelalison thememokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT craigjoyce thememokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT simsandrewj thememokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT eatonturneremily memokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT jenksmichelle memokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT mccoolrachael memokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT marshallchris memokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT millarliesl memokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT woodhannah memokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT peelalison memokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT craigjoyce memokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance
AT simsandrewj memokath051stentforthetreatmentofuretericobstructionanicemedicaltechnologyguidance