Cargando…
Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance
Material extrusion additive manufacturing has rapidly grown in use for tissue engineering research since its adoption in the year 2000. It has enabled researchers to produce scaffolds with intricate porous geometries that were not feasible with traditional manufacturing processes. Researchers can co...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-018-0121-4 |
_version_ | 1783336909455491072 |
---|---|
author | Gleadall, Andrew Visscher, Dafydd Yang, Jing Thomas, Daniel Segal, Joel |
author_facet | Gleadall, Andrew Visscher, Dafydd Yang, Jing Thomas, Daniel Segal, Joel |
author_sort | Gleadall, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Material extrusion additive manufacturing has rapidly grown in use for tissue engineering research since its adoption in the year 2000. It has enabled researchers to produce scaffolds with intricate porous geometries that were not feasible with traditional manufacturing processes. Researchers can control the structural geometry through a wide range of customisable printing parameters and design choices including material, print path, temperature, and many other process parameters. Currently, the impact of these choices is not fully understood. This review focuses on how the position and orientation of extruded filaments, which sometimes referred to as the print path, lay-down pattern, or simply “scaffold design”, affect scaffold properties and biological performance. By analysing trends across multiple studies, new understanding was developed on how filament position affects mechanical properties. Biological performance was also found to be affected by filament position, but a lack of consensus between studies indicates a need for further research and understanding. In most research studies, scaffold design was dictated by capabilities of additive manufacturing software rather than free-form design of structural geometry optimised for biological requirements. There is scope for much greater application of engineering innovation to additive manufacture novel geometries. To achieve this, better understanding of biological requirements is needed to enable the effective specification of ideal scaffold geometries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6029169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60291692018-07-09 Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance Gleadall, Andrew Visscher, Dafydd Yang, Jing Thomas, Daniel Segal, Joel Burns Trauma Review Material extrusion additive manufacturing has rapidly grown in use for tissue engineering research since its adoption in the year 2000. It has enabled researchers to produce scaffolds with intricate porous geometries that were not feasible with traditional manufacturing processes. Researchers can control the structural geometry through a wide range of customisable printing parameters and design choices including material, print path, temperature, and many other process parameters. Currently, the impact of these choices is not fully understood. This review focuses on how the position and orientation of extruded filaments, which sometimes referred to as the print path, lay-down pattern, or simply “scaffold design”, affect scaffold properties and biological performance. By analysing trends across multiple studies, new understanding was developed on how filament position affects mechanical properties. Biological performance was also found to be affected by filament position, but a lack of consensus between studies indicates a need for further research and understanding. In most research studies, scaffold design was dictated by capabilities of additive manufacturing software rather than free-form design of structural geometry optimised for biological requirements. There is scope for much greater application of engineering innovation to additive manufacture novel geometries. To achieve this, better understanding of biological requirements is needed to enable the effective specification of ideal scaffold geometries. BioMed Central 2018-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6029169/ /pubmed/29988731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-018-0121-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Gleadall, Andrew Visscher, Dafydd Yang, Jing Thomas, Daniel Segal, Joel Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance |
title | Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance |
title_full | Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance |
title_fullStr | Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance |
title_short | Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance |
title_sort | review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-018-0121-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gleadallandrew reviewofadditivemanufacturedtissueengineeringscaffoldsrelationshipbetweengeometryandperformance AT visscherdafydd reviewofadditivemanufacturedtissueengineeringscaffoldsrelationshipbetweengeometryandperformance AT yangjing reviewofadditivemanufacturedtissueengineeringscaffoldsrelationshipbetweengeometryandperformance AT thomasdaniel reviewofadditivemanufacturedtissueengineeringscaffoldsrelationshipbetweengeometryandperformance AT segaljoel reviewofadditivemanufacturedtissueengineeringscaffoldsrelationshipbetweengeometryandperformance |