Cargando…

Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance

Material extrusion additive manufacturing has rapidly grown in use for tissue engineering research since its adoption in the year 2000. It has enabled researchers to produce scaffolds with intricate porous geometries that were not feasible with traditional manufacturing processes. Researchers can co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gleadall, Andrew, Visscher, Dafydd, Yang, Jing, Thomas, Daniel, Segal, Joel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-018-0121-4
_version_ 1783336909455491072
author Gleadall, Andrew
Visscher, Dafydd
Yang, Jing
Thomas, Daniel
Segal, Joel
author_facet Gleadall, Andrew
Visscher, Dafydd
Yang, Jing
Thomas, Daniel
Segal, Joel
author_sort Gleadall, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Material extrusion additive manufacturing has rapidly grown in use for tissue engineering research since its adoption in the year 2000. It has enabled researchers to produce scaffolds with intricate porous geometries that were not feasible with traditional manufacturing processes. Researchers can control the structural geometry through a wide range of customisable printing parameters and design choices including material, print path, temperature, and many other process parameters. Currently, the impact of these choices is not fully understood. This review focuses on how the position and orientation of extruded filaments, which sometimes referred to as the print path, lay-down pattern, or simply “scaffold design”, affect scaffold properties and biological performance. By analysing trends across multiple studies, new understanding was developed on how filament position affects mechanical properties. Biological performance was also found to be affected by filament position, but a lack of consensus between studies indicates a need for further research and understanding. In most research studies, scaffold design was dictated by capabilities of additive manufacturing software rather than free-form design of structural geometry optimised for biological requirements. There is scope for much greater application of engineering innovation to additive manufacture novel geometries. To achieve this, better understanding of biological requirements is needed to enable the effective specification of ideal scaffold geometries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6029169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60291692018-07-09 Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance Gleadall, Andrew Visscher, Dafydd Yang, Jing Thomas, Daniel Segal, Joel Burns Trauma Review Material extrusion additive manufacturing has rapidly grown in use for tissue engineering research since its adoption in the year 2000. It has enabled researchers to produce scaffolds with intricate porous geometries that were not feasible with traditional manufacturing processes. Researchers can control the structural geometry through a wide range of customisable printing parameters and design choices including material, print path, temperature, and many other process parameters. Currently, the impact of these choices is not fully understood. This review focuses on how the position and orientation of extruded filaments, which sometimes referred to as the print path, lay-down pattern, or simply “scaffold design”, affect scaffold properties and biological performance. By analysing trends across multiple studies, new understanding was developed on how filament position affects mechanical properties. Biological performance was also found to be affected by filament position, but a lack of consensus between studies indicates a need for further research and understanding. In most research studies, scaffold design was dictated by capabilities of additive manufacturing software rather than free-form design of structural geometry optimised for biological requirements. There is scope for much greater application of engineering innovation to additive manufacture novel geometries. To achieve this, better understanding of biological requirements is needed to enable the effective specification of ideal scaffold geometries. BioMed Central 2018-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6029169/ /pubmed/29988731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-018-0121-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Gleadall, Andrew
Visscher, Dafydd
Yang, Jing
Thomas, Daniel
Segal, Joel
Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance
title Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance
title_full Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance
title_fullStr Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance
title_full_unstemmed Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance
title_short Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance
title_sort review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-018-0121-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gleadallandrew reviewofadditivemanufacturedtissueengineeringscaffoldsrelationshipbetweengeometryandperformance
AT visscherdafydd reviewofadditivemanufacturedtissueengineeringscaffoldsrelationshipbetweengeometryandperformance
AT yangjing reviewofadditivemanufacturedtissueengineeringscaffoldsrelationshipbetweengeometryandperformance
AT thomasdaniel reviewofadditivemanufacturedtissueengineeringscaffoldsrelationshipbetweengeometryandperformance
AT segaljoel reviewofadditivemanufacturedtissueengineeringscaffoldsrelationshipbetweengeometryandperformance