Cargando…

Validation of a Low-cost Optic Nerve Sheath Ultrasound Phantom: An Educational Tool

OBJECTIVE: To validate an ocular phantom as a realistic educational tool utilizing in vivo and phantom optic nerve sheath (ONS) images obtained by ultrasound. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 51 resident physicians from the Denver Health Residency in Emergency Medicine (EM) and 10 ultrasound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, David L., Oberfoell, Stephanie H., Trent, Stacy A., French, Andrew J., Kim, Daniel J., Richards, David B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmu.2017.01.003
_version_ 1783336933220417536
author Murphy, David L.
Oberfoell, Stephanie H.
Trent, Stacy A.
French, Andrew J.
Kim, Daniel J.
Richards, David B.
author_facet Murphy, David L.
Oberfoell, Stephanie H.
Trent, Stacy A.
French, Andrew J.
Kim, Daniel J.
Richards, David B.
author_sort Murphy, David L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To validate an ocular phantom as a realistic educational tool utilizing in vivo and phantom optic nerve sheath (ONS) images obtained by ultrasound. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 51 resident physicians from the Denver Health Residency in Emergency Medicine (EM) and 10 ultrasound fellowship-trained EM attending physicians. Participants performed optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements on five in vivo and five phantom ocular ultrasound images and rated the realism of each image on a 5-point Likert scale. Chi-square analysis was performed to evaluate the subjective “realness” of in vivo and phantom images. RESULTS: Sixty-one participants performed ONSD measurements. Mean Likert scale values were 3.43 (95% confidence interval: 3.31–3.55) for in vivo images and 3.41 (95% confidence interval: 3.28–3.54) for phantom images. There was no statistical difference in subjective “realness” between in vivo and phantom ONSD ultrasound images among EM residents. Ultrasound fellowship-trained EM attending physicians aptly differentiated between in vivo (p < 0.01) and phantom (p < 0.01) images, as compared with EM residents. CONCLUSION: Our ocular phantom simulates in vivo posterior ocular anatomy. EM resident physicians found the phantom indistinguishable from in vivo images. Our ONS model provides an inexpensive and realistic educational tool to teach bedside ONSD sonography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6029312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60293122018-07-31 Validation of a Low-cost Optic Nerve Sheath Ultrasound Phantom: An Educational Tool Murphy, David L. Oberfoell, Stephanie H. Trent, Stacy A. French, Andrew J. Kim, Daniel J. Richards, David B. J Med Ultrasound Original Article OBJECTIVE: To validate an ocular phantom as a realistic educational tool utilizing in vivo and phantom optic nerve sheath (ONS) images obtained by ultrasound. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 51 resident physicians from the Denver Health Residency in Emergency Medicine (EM) and 10 ultrasound fellowship-trained EM attending physicians. Participants performed optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements on five in vivo and five phantom ocular ultrasound images and rated the realism of each image on a 5-point Likert scale. Chi-square analysis was performed to evaluate the subjective “realness” of in vivo and phantom images. RESULTS: Sixty-one participants performed ONSD measurements. Mean Likert scale values were 3.43 (95% confidence interval: 3.31–3.55) for in vivo images and 3.41 (95% confidence interval: 3.28–3.54) for phantom images. There was no statistical difference in subjective “realness” between in vivo and phantom ONSD ultrasound images among EM residents. Ultrasound fellowship-trained EM attending physicians aptly differentiated between in vivo (p < 0.01) and phantom (p < 0.01) images, as compared with EM residents. CONCLUSION: Our ocular phantom simulates in vivo posterior ocular anatomy. EM resident physicians found the phantom indistinguishable from in vivo images. Our ONS model provides an inexpensive and realistic educational tool to teach bedside ONSD sonography. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 2017-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6029312/ /pubmed/30065467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmu.2017.01.003 Text en Copyright: © 2017, Elsevier Taiwan LLC and the Chinese Taipei Society of Ultrasound in Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Murphy, David L.
Oberfoell, Stephanie H.
Trent, Stacy A.
French, Andrew J.
Kim, Daniel J.
Richards, David B.
Validation of a Low-cost Optic Nerve Sheath Ultrasound Phantom: An Educational Tool
title Validation of a Low-cost Optic Nerve Sheath Ultrasound Phantom: An Educational Tool
title_full Validation of a Low-cost Optic Nerve Sheath Ultrasound Phantom: An Educational Tool
title_fullStr Validation of a Low-cost Optic Nerve Sheath Ultrasound Phantom: An Educational Tool
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Low-cost Optic Nerve Sheath Ultrasound Phantom: An Educational Tool
title_short Validation of a Low-cost Optic Nerve Sheath Ultrasound Phantom: An Educational Tool
title_sort validation of a low-cost optic nerve sheath ultrasound phantom: an educational tool
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmu.2017.01.003
work_keys_str_mv AT murphydavidl validationofalowcostopticnervesheathultrasoundphantomaneducationaltool
AT oberfoellstephanieh validationofalowcostopticnervesheathultrasoundphantomaneducationaltool
AT trentstacya validationofalowcostopticnervesheathultrasoundphantomaneducationaltool
AT frenchandrewj validationofalowcostopticnervesheathultrasoundphantomaneducationaltool
AT kimdanielj validationofalowcostopticnervesheathultrasoundphantomaneducationaltool
AT richardsdavidb validationofalowcostopticnervesheathultrasoundphantomaneducationaltool