Cargando…

A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA

BACKGROUND: Early screening for prostate cancer (PCA) remains controversial because of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant cancers. Even though a number of diagnostic tests have been developed to improve on PSA testing, there remains a need for a more informative non-invasive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brikun, Igor, Nusskern, Deborah, Decatus, Andrew, Harvey, Eric, Li, Lin, Freije, Diha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0524-x
_version_ 1783336952912674816
author Brikun, Igor
Nusskern, Deborah
Decatus, Andrew
Harvey, Eric
Li, Lin
Freije, Diha
author_facet Brikun, Igor
Nusskern, Deborah
Decatus, Andrew
Harvey, Eric
Li, Lin
Freije, Diha
author_sort Brikun, Igor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early screening for prostate cancer (PCA) remains controversial because of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant cancers. Even though a number of diagnostic tests have been developed to improve on PSA testing, there remains a need for a more informative non-invasive test for PCA. The objective of this study is to identify a panel of DNA methylation markers suitable for a non-invasive diagnostic test from urine DNA collected following a digital rectal exam (DRE) and/or from first morning void (FV). A secondary objective is to determine if the cumulative methylation is indicative of biopsy findings. METHODS: DRE and FV urine samples were prospectively collected from 94 patients and analyzed using 24 methylation-specific quantitative PCR assays derived from 19 CpG islands. The methylation of individual markers and various combinations of markers was compared to biopsy results. A methylation threshold for cancer classification was determined using a target specificity of 70%. The average methylation and the number of positive markers were also compared to the result of the biopsy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated. RESULTS: Methylation of all 19 markers was detected in FV and DRE DNAs. Combining the methylation of two or more markers improved on individual marker results. Using 6of19 methylated markers as the threshold for cancer classification yielded a specificity of 71% (95% CI, 0.57–0.86) from both DRE and FV and a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI, 0.79–0.97) from DRE and 94% (95% CI, 0.84–1.0) from FV. The negative predictive value at the 6of19 threshold was ≥ 90 for both DNA types. CONCLUSIONS: PCA-specific methylation was detected in both FV and DRE DNA. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy at the 6of19 threshold between DRE and FV urine DNA. The results support the development of a non-invasive diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies in men with elevated PSA. The test can also provide patients with personalized recommendations based on their own methylation profile. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-018-0524-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6029393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60293932018-07-09 A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA Brikun, Igor Nusskern, Deborah Decatus, Andrew Harvey, Eric Li, Lin Freije, Diha Clin Epigenetics Research BACKGROUND: Early screening for prostate cancer (PCA) remains controversial because of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant cancers. Even though a number of diagnostic tests have been developed to improve on PSA testing, there remains a need for a more informative non-invasive test for PCA. The objective of this study is to identify a panel of DNA methylation markers suitable for a non-invasive diagnostic test from urine DNA collected following a digital rectal exam (DRE) and/or from first morning void (FV). A secondary objective is to determine if the cumulative methylation is indicative of biopsy findings. METHODS: DRE and FV urine samples were prospectively collected from 94 patients and analyzed using 24 methylation-specific quantitative PCR assays derived from 19 CpG islands. The methylation of individual markers and various combinations of markers was compared to biopsy results. A methylation threshold for cancer classification was determined using a target specificity of 70%. The average methylation and the number of positive markers were also compared to the result of the biopsy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated. RESULTS: Methylation of all 19 markers was detected in FV and DRE DNAs. Combining the methylation of two or more markers improved on individual marker results. Using 6of19 methylated markers as the threshold for cancer classification yielded a specificity of 71% (95% CI, 0.57–0.86) from both DRE and FV and a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI, 0.79–0.97) from DRE and 94% (95% CI, 0.84–1.0) from FV. The negative predictive value at the 6of19 threshold was ≥ 90 for both DNA types. CONCLUSIONS: PCA-specific methylation was detected in both FV and DRE DNA. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy at the 6of19 threshold between DRE and FV urine DNA. The results support the development of a non-invasive diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies in men with elevated PSA. The test can also provide patients with personalized recommendations based on their own methylation profile. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-018-0524-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6029393/ /pubmed/29988684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0524-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Brikun, Igor
Nusskern, Deborah
Decatus, Andrew
Harvey, Eric
Li, Lin
Freije, Diha
A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA
title A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA
title_full A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA
title_fullStr A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA
title_full_unstemmed A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA
title_short A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA
title_sort panel of dna methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from fv and dre urine dna
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0524-x
work_keys_str_mv AT brikunigor apanelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT nusskerndeborah apanelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT decatusandrew apanelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT harveyeric apanelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT lilin apanelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT freijediha apanelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT brikunigor panelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT nusskerndeborah panelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT decatusandrew panelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT harveyeric panelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT lilin panelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna
AT freijediha panelofdnamethylationmarkersforthedetectionofprostatecancerfromfvanddreurinedna