Cargando…

Validation of Activity Tracking Procedures in Elderly Patients after Operative Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures

BACKGROUND: Early postoperative physical activity in elderly patients suffering from proximal femoral fractures may reduce mortality. We hypothesized that activity trackers can reliably and objectively monitor the in-hospital mobilization, correlating with functional independence and quality of life...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmal, Hagen, Holsgaard-Larsen, Anders, Izadpanah, Kaywan, Brønd, Jan Christian, Madsen, Carsten Fladmose, Lauritsen, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3521271
_version_ 1783336967597981696
author Schmal, Hagen
Holsgaard-Larsen, Anders
Izadpanah, Kaywan
Brønd, Jan Christian
Madsen, Carsten Fladmose
Lauritsen, Jens
author_facet Schmal, Hagen
Holsgaard-Larsen, Anders
Izadpanah, Kaywan
Brønd, Jan Christian
Madsen, Carsten Fladmose
Lauritsen, Jens
author_sort Schmal, Hagen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early postoperative physical activity in elderly patients suffering from proximal femoral fractures may reduce mortality. We hypothesized that activity trackers can reliably and objectively monitor the in-hospital mobilization, correlating with functional independence and quality of life. METHODS: Three different tracker types (Fitbit™ flex, Misfit™ Shine, and Axivity AX3) at three locations (wrist, ankle, and femur) recorded steps and signal vector magnitudes (SVM) in 22 patients. They were 81 ± 8 years old, were equally distributed between the sexes, and had an ASA score of 2.5 ± 0.6. Single protocoled activity events (n = 191) were clinically categorized into 4 levels and correlated with the monitored signals. Additionally, 2 ± 1 and 8 ± 3 days after the operation, the EuroQol-5D and the Barthel-20 index supplemented this data. RESULTS: All measurements at the wrist (Fitbit, Misfit) resulted in unacceptable accuracy; however, sensitivity and specificity reached around 90% using the Misfit at the ankle. Applying this combination, the correlation between real and measured steps (R(2) = 0.99) and the category discrimination were statistically significant (p < 0.002). A discriminant analysis featured the calculation of four activity levels based on SVM measurements using the Axivity tracker at the femur. A cluster analysis showed a 100% agreement between the clinically observed and the calculated activity levels. The amount of active minutes or periods and both the EuroQol-5D and the Barthel-20 indices significantly increased between the analyzed time points after the operation. However, only the Barthel-20 was associated with the measured activity levels (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The Misfit and the Axivity trackers can reliably monitor activity in elderly patients after operative treatment of proximal femur fractures. However, the wear location is decisive. Objectively measured activity correlated with functional independence and quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6029464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60294642018-07-17 Validation of Activity Tracking Procedures in Elderly Patients after Operative Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures Schmal, Hagen Holsgaard-Larsen, Anders Izadpanah, Kaywan Brønd, Jan Christian Madsen, Carsten Fladmose Lauritsen, Jens Rehabil Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Early postoperative physical activity in elderly patients suffering from proximal femoral fractures may reduce mortality. We hypothesized that activity trackers can reliably and objectively monitor the in-hospital mobilization, correlating with functional independence and quality of life. METHODS: Three different tracker types (Fitbit™ flex, Misfit™ Shine, and Axivity AX3) at three locations (wrist, ankle, and femur) recorded steps and signal vector magnitudes (SVM) in 22 patients. They were 81 ± 8 years old, were equally distributed between the sexes, and had an ASA score of 2.5 ± 0.6. Single protocoled activity events (n = 191) were clinically categorized into 4 levels and correlated with the monitored signals. Additionally, 2 ± 1 and 8 ± 3 days after the operation, the EuroQol-5D and the Barthel-20 index supplemented this data. RESULTS: All measurements at the wrist (Fitbit, Misfit) resulted in unacceptable accuracy; however, sensitivity and specificity reached around 90% using the Misfit at the ankle. Applying this combination, the correlation between real and measured steps (R(2) = 0.99) and the category discrimination were statistically significant (p < 0.002). A discriminant analysis featured the calculation of four activity levels based on SVM measurements using the Axivity tracker at the femur. A cluster analysis showed a 100% agreement between the clinically observed and the calculated activity levels. The amount of active minutes or periods and both the EuroQol-5D and the Barthel-20 indices significantly increased between the analyzed time points after the operation. However, only the Barthel-20 was associated with the measured activity levels (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The Misfit and the Axivity trackers can reliably monitor activity in elderly patients after operative treatment of proximal femur fractures. However, the wear location is decisive. Objectively measured activity correlated with functional independence and quality of life. Hindawi 2018-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6029464/ /pubmed/30018824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3521271 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hagen Schmal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schmal, Hagen
Holsgaard-Larsen, Anders
Izadpanah, Kaywan
Brønd, Jan Christian
Madsen, Carsten Fladmose
Lauritsen, Jens
Validation of Activity Tracking Procedures in Elderly Patients after Operative Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures
title Validation of Activity Tracking Procedures in Elderly Patients after Operative Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures
title_full Validation of Activity Tracking Procedures in Elderly Patients after Operative Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures
title_fullStr Validation of Activity Tracking Procedures in Elderly Patients after Operative Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Activity Tracking Procedures in Elderly Patients after Operative Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures
title_short Validation of Activity Tracking Procedures in Elderly Patients after Operative Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures
title_sort validation of activity tracking procedures in elderly patients after operative treatment of proximal femur fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3521271
work_keys_str_mv AT schmalhagen validationofactivitytrackingproceduresinelderlypatientsafteroperativetreatmentofproximalfemurfractures
AT holsgaardlarsenanders validationofactivitytrackingproceduresinelderlypatientsafteroperativetreatmentofproximalfemurfractures
AT izadpanahkaywan validationofactivitytrackingproceduresinelderlypatientsafteroperativetreatmentofproximalfemurfractures
AT brøndjanchristian validationofactivitytrackingproceduresinelderlypatientsafteroperativetreatmentofproximalfemurfractures
AT madsencarstenfladmose validationofactivitytrackingproceduresinelderlypatientsafteroperativetreatmentofproximalfemurfractures
AT lauritsenjens validationofactivitytrackingproceduresinelderlypatientsafteroperativetreatmentofproximalfemurfractures