Cargando…
Comparison of Machine-Learning Classification Models for Glaucoma Management
This study develops an objective machine-learning classification model for classifying glaucomatous optic discs and reveals the classificatory criteria to assist in clinical glaucoma management. In this study, 163 glaucoma eyes were labelled with four optic disc types by three glaucoma specialists a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6874765 |
_version_ | 1783336967828668416 |
---|---|
author | An, Guangzhou Omodaka, Kazuko Tsuda, Satoru Shiga, Yukihiro Takada, Naoko Kikawa, Tsutomu Nakazawa, Toru Yokota, Hideo Akiba, Masahiro |
author_facet | An, Guangzhou Omodaka, Kazuko Tsuda, Satoru Shiga, Yukihiro Takada, Naoko Kikawa, Tsutomu Nakazawa, Toru Yokota, Hideo Akiba, Masahiro |
author_sort | An, Guangzhou |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study develops an objective machine-learning classification model for classifying glaucomatous optic discs and reveals the classificatory criteria to assist in clinical glaucoma management. In this study, 163 glaucoma eyes were labelled with four optic disc types by three glaucoma specialists and then randomly separated into training and test data. All the images of these eyes were captured using optical coherence tomography and laser speckle flowgraphy to quantify the ocular structure and blood-flow-related parameters. A total of 91 parameters were extracted from each eye along with the patients' background information. Machine-learning classifiers, including the neural network (NN), naïve Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), and gradient boosted decision trees (GBDT), were trained to build the classification models, and a hybrid feature selection method that combines minimum redundancy maximum relevance and genetic-algorithm-based feature selection was applied to find the most valid and relevant features for NN, NB, and SVM. A comparison of the performance of the three machine-learning classification models showed that the NN had the best classification performance with a validated accuracy of 87.8% using only nine ocular parameters. These selected quantified parameters enabled the trained NN to classify glaucomatous optic discs with relatively high performance without requiring color fundus images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6029465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60294652018-07-17 Comparison of Machine-Learning Classification Models for Glaucoma Management An, Guangzhou Omodaka, Kazuko Tsuda, Satoru Shiga, Yukihiro Takada, Naoko Kikawa, Tsutomu Nakazawa, Toru Yokota, Hideo Akiba, Masahiro J Healthc Eng Research Article This study develops an objective machine-learning classification model for classifying glaucomatous optic discs and reveals the classificatory criteria to assist in clinical glaucoma management. In this study, 163 glaucoma eyes were labelled with four optic disc types by three glaucoma specialists and then randomly separated into training and test data. All the images of these eyes were captured using optical coherence tomography and laser speckle flowgraphy to quantify the ocular structure and blood-flow-related parameters. A total of 91 parameters were extracted from each eye along with the patients' background information. Machine-learning classifiers, including the neural network (NN), naïve Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), and gradient boosted decision trees (GBDT), were trained to build the classification models, and a hybrid feature selection method that combines minimum redundancy maximum relevance and genetic-algorithm-based feature selection was applied to find the most valid and relevant features for NN, NB, and SVM. A comparison of the performance of the three machine-learning classification models showed that the NN had the best classification performance with a validated accuracy of 87.8% using only nine ocular parameters. These selected quantified parameters enabled the trained NN to classify glaucomatous optic discs with relatively high performance without requiring color fundus images. Hindawi 2018-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6029465/ /pubmed/30018755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6874765 Text en Copyright © 2018 Guangzhou An et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article An, Guangzhou Omodaka, Kazuko Tsuda, Satoru Shiga, Yukihiro Takada, Naoko Kikawa, Tsutomu Nakazawa, Toru Yokota, Hideo Akiba, Masahiro Comparison of Machine-Learning Classification Models for Glaucoma Management |
title | Comparison of Machine-Learning Classification Models for Glaucoma Management |
title_full | Comparison of Machine-Learning Classification Models for Glaucoma Management |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Machine-Learning Classification Models for Glaucoma Management |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Machine-Learning Classification Models for Glaucoma Management |
title_short | Comparison of Machine-Learning Classification Models for Glaucoma Management |
title_sort | comparison of machine-learning classification models for glaucoma management |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6874765 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anguangzhou comparisonofmachinelearningclassificationmodelsforglaucomamanagement AT omodakakazuko comparisonofmachinelearningclassificationmodelsforglaucomamanagement AT tsudasatoru comparisonofmachinelearningclassificationmodelsforglaucomamanagement AT shigayukihiro comparisonofmachinelearningclassificationmodelsforglaucomamanagement AT takadanaoko comparisonofmachinelearningclassificationmodelsforglaucomamanagement AT kikawatsutomu comparisonofmachinelearningclassificationmodelsforglaucomamanagement AT nakazawatoru comparisonofmachinelearningclassificationmodelsforglaucomamanagement AT yokotahideo comparisonofmachinelearningclassificationmodelsforglaucomamanagement AT akibamasahiro comparisonofmachinelearningclassificationmodelsforglaucomamanagement |