Cargando…

Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients

PURPOSE: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder among young adults associated with presence of myofascial trigger points. We aimed to evaluate efficacy of ozone injection (OI) in MPS patients, compared with two currently used methods including lidocaine injection (LI) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad, Rayegani, Seyed Mansoor, Sadeghi, Fatemeh, Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988746
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S164629
_version_ 1783336993170653184
author Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
Rayegani, Seyed Mansoor
Sadeghi, Fatemeh
Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
author_facet Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
Rayegani, Seyed Mansoor
Sadeghi, Fatemeh
Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
author_sort Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder among young adults associated with presence of myofascial trigger points. We aimed to evaluate efficacy of ozone injection (OI) in MPS patients, compared with two currently used methods including lidocaine injection (LI) and dry needling (DN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-blinded study, a total of 72 eligible patients were included and then randomly divided into three equal groups: DN, OI, and LI. All patients received treatment in three weekly sessions. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, cervical lateral flexion, pain pressure threshold (PPT), and neck disability index (NDI) were the main outcome measures, which were evaluated at baseline and at 4 weeks after injections. Analytic results were demonstrated as both within- and between-groups mean difference (MD). RESULTS: Sixty two patients finished the study, 20 participants in both the DN and LI groups, and 22 persons in OI group. Distribution of all demographics and baseline clinical variables were relatively similar among groups. All three interventions were remarkably effective in improving patients’ pain and PPT. Significant decrease in VAS (MD=–3.6±1.4) and increase in PPT (MD=7.2±5.1) within 4 weeks follow-up confirmed this finding. Also, NDI had similar significant improvement (MD=–9.9±8.7), but lateral flexion range did not show remarkable increase. There was also a statistically significant difference among three methods’ efficacy on VAS, NDI, and PPT, favoring OI and LI. CONCLUSION: In summary, this data showed that in short-term follow-up, all three methods were significantly effective in MPS treatment; however, OI and LI groups had slightly better results than the DN group, with no remarkable preference between them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6029589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60295892018-07-09 Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad Rayegani, Seyed Mansoor Sadeghi, Fatemeh Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram J Pain Res Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder among young adults associated with presence of myofascial trigger points. We aimed to evaluate efficacy of ozone injection (OI) in MPS patients, compared with two currently used methods including lidocaine injection (LI) and dry needling (DN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-blinded study, a total of 72 eligible patients were included and then randomly divided into three equal groups: DN, OI, and LI. All patients received treatment in three weekly sessions. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, cervical lateral flexion, pain pressure threshold (PPT), and neck disability index (NDI) were the main outcome measures, which were evaluated at baseline and at 4 weeks after injections. Analytic results were demonstrated as both within- and between-groups mean difference (MD). RESULTS: Sixty two patients finished the study, 20 participants in both the DN and LI groups, and 22 persons in OI group. Distribution of all demographics and baseline clinical variables were relatively similar among groups. All three interventions were remarkably effective in improving patients’ pain and PPT. Significant decrease in VAS (MD=–3.6±1.4) and increase in PPT (MD=7.2±5.1) within 4 weeks follow-up confirmed this finding. Also, NDI had similar significant improvement (MD=–9.9±8.7), but lateral flexion range did not show remarkable increase. There was also a statistically significant difference among three methods’ efficacy on VAS, NDI, and PPT, favoring OI and LI. CONCLUSION: In summary, this data showed that in short-term follow-up, all three methods were significantly effective in MPS treatment; however, OI and LI groups had slightly better results than the DN group, with no remarkable preference between them. Dove Medical Press 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6029589/ /pubmed/29988746 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S164629 Text en © 2018 Raeissadat et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
Rayegani, Seyed Mansoor
Sadeghi, Fatemeh
Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients
title Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients
title_full Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients
title_fullStr Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients
title_short Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients
title_sort comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988746
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S164629
work_keys_str_mv AT raeissadatseyedahmad comparisonofozoneandlidocaineinjectionefficacyvsdryneedlinginmyofascialpainsyndromepatients
AT rayeganiseyedmansoor comparisonofozoneandlidocaineinjectionefficacyvsdryneedlinginmyofascialpainsyndromepatients
AT sadeghifatemeh comparisonofozoneandlidocaineinjectionefficacyvsdryneedlinginmyofascialpainsyndromepatients
AT rahimidehgolanshahram comparisonofozoneandlidocaineinjectionefficacyvsdryneedlinginmyofascialpainsyndromepatients