Cargando…
Dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study
OBJECTIVE: Conscious sedation for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has not been standardized, and there are no studies of sedation for colorectal ESD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial to clarify the usefulness of DEX during colorectal ESD....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29970896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41424-018-0032-5 |
_version_ | 1783337070968700928 |
---|---|
author | Kinugasa, Hideaki Higashi, Reiji Miyahara, Koji Moritou, Yuki Hirao, Ken Ogawa, Tsuneyoshi Kunihiro, Masaki Nakagawa, Masahiro |
author_facet | Kinugasa, Hideaki Higashi, Reiji Miyahara, Koji Moritou, Yuki Hirao, Ken Ogawa, Tsuneyoshi Kunihiro, Masaki Nakagawa, Masahiro |
author_sort | Kinugasa, Hideaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Conscious sedation for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has not been standardized, and there are no studies of sedation for colorectal ESD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial to clarify the usefulness of DEX during colorectal ESD. In total 80 patients with colorectal ESD from April 2016 to May 2017 were assigned to the placebo group or the DEX group (40 cases each). The primary outcome was patient satisfaction (visual analogue scale: VAS). Secondary outcomes were evaluated for 13 factors, including patient pain level (VAS), endoscopist satisfaction (VAS), objective patient pain level viewed from the endoscopist’s perspective (VAS), rate of patient response, rate of side effects, etc., from the patient’s and endoscopist’s perspectives. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was 8.4 and 9.1 (P = 0.018) in the placebo group and the DEX group, respectively. Secondary outcomes of patient pain level, endoscopist satisfaction, objective patient pain level from the endoscopist’s perspective for the placebo and DEX groups were 1.2 and 0.4 (P = 0.045), 8.2 and 9.3 (P < 0.001), and 1.2 and 0.5 (P = 0.002), respectively. All of these were significantly positive results (more comfortable and less pain) in the DEX group. The rate of a patient response was 100% in all cases. The side effects (hypoxia/bradycardia/hypotension) were 0%/0%/0% and 7.5%/7.5%/5% (P = 0.030). However, these rates were less than the reported side effect occurrence rate, and no additional medication was needed. CONCLUSION: DEX enables conscious sedation, and is useful not only for patient and endoscopist satisfaction but also for pain relief. DEX is an effective sedation method for colorectal ESD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6030068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60300682018-07-05 Dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study Kinugasa, Hideaki Higashi, Reiji Miyahara, Koji Moritou, Yuki Hirao, Ken Ogawa, Tsuneyoshi Kunihiro, Masaki Nakagawa, Masahiro Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article OBJECTIVE: Conscious sedation for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has not been standardized, and there are no studies of sedation for colorectal ESD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial to clarify the usefulness of DEX during colorectal ESD. In total 80 patients with colorectal ESD from April 2016 to May 2017 were assigned to the placebo group or the DEX group (40 cases each). The primary outcome was patient satisfaction (visual analogue scale: VAS). Secondary outcomes were evaluated for 13 factors, including patient pain level (VAS), endoscopist satisfaction (VAS), objective patient pain level viewed from the endoscopist’s perspective (VAS), rate of patient response, rate of side effects, etc., from the patient’s and endoscopist’s perspectives. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was 8.4 and 9.1 (P = 0.018) in the placebo group and the DEX group, respectively. Secondary outcomes of patient pain level, endoscopist satisfaction, objective patient pain level from the endoscopist’s perspective for the placebo and DEX groups were 1.2 and 0.4 (P = 0.045), 8.2 and 9.3 (P < 0.001), and 1.2 and 0.5 (P = 0.002), respectively. All of these were significantly positive results (more comfortable and less pain) in the DEX group. The rate of a patient response was 100% in all cases. The side effects (hypoxia/bradycardia/hypotension) were 0%/0%/0% and 7.5%/7.5%/5% (P = 0.030). However, these rates were less than the reported side effect occurrence rate, and no additional medication was needed. CONCLUSION: DEX enables conscious sedation, and is useful not only for patient and endoscopist satisfaction but also for pain relief. DEX is an effective sedation method for colorectal ESD. Nature Publishing Group US 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6030068/ /pubmed/29970896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41424-018-0032-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kinugasa, Hideaki Higashi, Reiji Miyahara, Koji Moritou, Yuki Hirao, Ken Ogawa, Tsuneyoshi Kunihiro, Masaki Nakagawa, Masahiro Dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study |
title | Dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study |
title_full | Dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study |
title_short | Dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study |
title_sort | dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29970896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41424-018-0032-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kinugasahideaki dexmedetomidineforconscioussedationwithcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectivedoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT higashireiji dexmedetomidineforconscioussedationwithcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectivedoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT miyaharakoji dexmedetomidineforconscioussedationwithcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectivedoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT moritouyuki dexmedetomidineforconscioussedationwithcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectivedoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hiraoken dexmedetomidineforconscioussedationwithcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectivedoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT ogawatsuneyoshi dexmedetomidineforconscioussedationwithcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectivedoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kunihiromasaki dexmedetomidineforconscioussedationwithcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectivedoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT nakagawamasahiro dexmedetomidineforconscioussedationwithcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectivedoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy |