Cargando…

The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men

Models of sexual response posit that attentional processing of sexual cues is requisite for sexual responding. Despite hypothesized similarities in the underlying processes resulting in sexual response, gender differences in sexual arousal patterns are abundant. One such gender difference relates to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dawson, Samantha J., Chivers, Meredith L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30110446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172286
_version_ 1783337116637331456
author Dawson, Samantha J.
Chivers, Meredith L.
author_facet Dawson, Samantha J.
Chivers, Meredith L.
author_sort Dawson, Samantha J.
collection PubMed
description Models of sexual response posit that attentional processing of sexual cues is requisite for sexual responding. Despite hypothesized similarities in the underlying processes resulting in sexual response, gender differences in sexual arousal patterns are abundant. One such gender difference relates to the stimulus features (e.g. gender cues, sexual activity cues) that elicit a response in men and women. In this study, we examined how stimulus modality (static visual images versus dynamic audiovisual films) and stimulus features (gender, sexual activity and nonsexual contextual cues) influences attentional (i.e. gaze) and elaborative (i.e. self-reported attraction (SRA), self-reported arousal) processing of sexual stimuli. Men's initial and controlled attention was consistently gender-specific (i.e. greater attention towards female targets), and this was not influenced by stimulus modality or the presence of sexual activity cues. By contrast, gender-specificity of women's attention patterns differed as a function of attentional stage, stimulus modality and the features within the stimulus. Degree of specificity was positively predictive of SRA in both genders; however, it was not significantly predictive of self-reported arousal. These findings are discussed in the context of gendered processing of visual sexual information, including a discussion of implications for research designs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6030282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60302822018-07-17 The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men Dawson, Samantha J. Chivers, Meredith L. R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Models of sexual response posit that attentional processing of sexual cues is requisite for sexual responding. Despite hypothesized similarities in the underlying processes resulting in sexual response, gender differences in sexual arousal patterns are abundant. One such gender difference relates to the stimulus features (e.g. gender cues, sexual activity cues) that elicit a response in men and women. In this study, we examined how stimulus modality (static visual images versus dynamic audiovisual films) and stimulus features (gender, sexual activity and nonsexual contextual cues) influences attentional (i.e. gaze) and elaborative (i.e. self-reported attraction (SRA), self-reported arousal) processing of sexual stimuli. Men's initial and controlled attention was consistently gender-specific (i.e. greater attention towards female targets), and this was not influenced by stimulus modality or the presence of sexual activity cues. By contrast, gender-specificity of women's attention patterns differed as a function of attentional stage, stimulus modality and the features within the stimulus. Degree of specificity was positively predictive of SRA in both genders; however, it was not significantly predictive of self-reported arousal. These findings are discussed in the context of gendered processing of visual sexual information, including a discussion of implications for research designs. The Royal Society Publishing 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6030282/ /pubmed/30110446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172286 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Dawson, Samantha J.
Chivers, Meredith L.
The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men
title The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men
title_full The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men
title_fullStr The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men
title_full_unstemmed The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men
title_short The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men
title_sort effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men
topic Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30110446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172286
work_keys_str_mv AT dawsonsamanthaj theeffectofstaticversusdynamicstimulionvisualprocessingofsexualcuesinandrophilicwomenandgynephilicmen
AT chiversmeredithl theeffectofstaticversusdynamicstimulionvisualprocessingofsexualcuesinandrophilicwomenandgynephilicmen
AT dawsonsamanthaj effectofstaticversusdynamicstimulionvisualprocessingofsexualcuesinandrophilicwomenandgynephilicmen
AT chiversmeredithl effectofstaticversusdynamicstimulionvisualprocessingofsexualcuesinandrophilicwomenandgynephilicmen