Cargando…
Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa
BACKGROUND: Efficient and effective strategies for identifying cases of active tuberculosis (TB) in rural sub-Saharan Africa are lacking. Household contact tracing offers a potential approach to diagnose more TB cases, and to do so earlier in the disease course. METHODS: Adults newly diagnosed with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3193-7 |
_version_ | 1783337183519703040 |
---|---|
author | Little, Kristen M. Msandiwa, Reginah Martinson, Neil Golub, Jonathan Chaisson, Richard Dowdy, David |
author_facet | Little, Kristen M. Msandiwa, Reginah Martinson, Neil Golub, Jonathan Chaisson, Richard Dowdy, David |
author_sort | Little, Kristen M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Efficient and effective strategies for identifying cases of active tuberculosis (TB) in rural sub-Saharan Africa are lacking. Household contact tracing offers a potential approach to diagnose more TB cases, and to do so earlier in the disease course. METHODS: Adults newly diagnosed with active TB were recruited from public clinics in Vhembe District, South Africa. Study staff visited index case households and collected sputum specimens for TB testing via smear microscopy and culture. We calculated the yield and the number of households needed to screen (NHNS) to find one additional case. Predictors of new TB among household contacts were evaluated using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: We recruited 130 index cases and 282 household contacts. We identified 11 previously undiagnosed cases of bacteriologically-confirmed TB, giving a prevalence of 3.9% (95% CI: 2.0–6.9%) among contacts, a yield of 8.5 per 100 (95% CI: 4.2–15.1) index cases traced, and NHNS of 12 (95% CI: 7–24). The majority of new TB cases (10/11, 90.9%) were smear negative, culture positive. The presence of TB symptoms was not associated with an increased odds of active TB (aOR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1–1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Household contacts of recently diagnosed TB patients in rural South Africa have high prevalence of TB and can be feasibly detected through contact tracing, but more sensitive tests than sputum smear are required. Symptom screening among household contacts had low sensitivity and specificity for active TB in this study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6030742 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60307422018-07-09 Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa Little, Kristen M. Msandiwa, Reginah Martinson, Neil Golub, Jonathan Chaisson, Richard Dowdy, David BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Efficient and effective strategies for identifying cases of active tuberculosis (TB) in rural sub-Saharan Africa are lacking. Household contact tracing offers a potential approach to diagnose more TB cases, and to do so earlier in the disease course. METHODS: Adults newly diagnosed with active TB were recruited from public clinics in Vhembe District, South Africa. Study staff visited index case households and collected sputum specimens for TB testing via smear microscopy and culture. We calculated the yield and the number of households needed to screen (NHNS) to find one additional case. Predictors of new TB among household contacts were evaluated using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: We recruited 130 index cases and 282 household contacts. We identified 11 previously undiagnosed cases of bacteriologically-confirmed TB, giving a prevalence of 3.9% (95% CI: 2.0–6.9%) among contacts, a yield of 8.5 per 100 (95% CI: 4.2–15.1) index cases traced, and NHNS of 12 (95% CI: 7–24). The majority of new TB cases (10/11, 90.9%) were smear negative, culture positive. The presence of TB symptoms was not associated with an increased odds of active TB (aOR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1–1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Household contacts of recently diagnosed TB patients in rural South Africa have high prevalence of TB and can be feasibly detected through contact tracing, but more sensitive tests than sputum smear are required. Symptom screening among household contacts had low sensitivity and specificity for active TB in this study. BioMed Central 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6030742/ /pubmed/29973140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3193-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Little, Kristen M. Msandiwa, Reginah Martinson, Neil Golub, Jonathan Chaisson, Richard Dowdy, David Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa |
title | Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa |
title_full | Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa |
title_fullStr | Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa |
title_short | Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa |
title_sort | yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural south africa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3193-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT littlekristenm yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica AT msandiwareginah yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica AT martinsonneil yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica AT golubjonathan yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica AT chaissonrichard yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica AT dowdydavid yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica |