Cargando…

Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa

BACKGROUND: Efficient and effective strategies for identifying cases of active tuberculosis (TB) in rural sub-Saharan Africa are lacking. Household contact tracing offers a potential approach to diagnose more TB cases, and to do so earlier in the disease course. METHODS: Adults newly diagnosed with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Little, Kristen M., Msandiwa, Reginah, Martinson, Neil, Golub, Jonathan, Chaisson, Richard, Dowdy, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3193-7
_version_ 1783337183519703040
author Little, Kristen M.
Msandiwa, Reginah
Martinson, Neil
Golub, Jonathan
Chaisson, Richard
Dowdy, David
author_facet Little, Kristen M.
Msandiwa, Reginah
Martinson, Neil
Golub, Jonathan
Chaisson, Richard
Dowdy, David
author_sort Little, Kristen M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efficient and effective strategies for identifying cases of active tuberculosis (TB) in rural sub-Saharan Africa are lacking. Household contact tracing offers a potential approach to diagnose more TB cases, and to do so earlier in the disease course. METHODS: Adults newly diagnosed with active TB were recruited from public clinics in Vhembe District, South Africa. Study staff visited index case households and collected sputum specimens for TB testing via smear microscopy and culture. We calculated the yield and the number of households needed to screen (NHNS) to find one additional case. Predictors of new TB among household contacts were evaluated using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: We recruited 130 index cases and 282 household contacts. We identified 11 previously undiagnosed cases of bacteriologically-confirmed TB, giving a prevalence of 3.9% (95% CI: 2.0–6.9%) among contacts, a yield of 8.5 per 100 (95% CI: 4.2–15.1) index cases traced, and NHNS of 12 (95% CI: 7–24). The majority of new TB cases (10/11, 90.9%) were smear negative, culture positive. The presence of TB symptoms was not associated with an increased odds of active TB (aOR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1–1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Household contacts of recently diagnosed TB patients in rural South Africa have high prevalence of TB and can be feasibly detected through contact tracing, but more sensitive tests than sputum smear are required. Symptom screening among household contacts had low sensitivity and specificity for active TB in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6030742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60307422018-07-09 Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa Little, Kristen M. Msandiwa, Reginah Martinson, Neil Golub, Jonathan Chaisson, Richard Dowdy, David BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Efficient and effective strategies for identifying cases of active tuberculosis (TB) in rural sub-Saharan Africa are lacking. Household contact tracing offers a potential approach to diagnose more TB cases, and to do so earlier in the disease course. METHODS: Adults newly diagnosed with active TB were recruited from public clinics in Vhembe District, South Africa. Study staff visited index case households and collected sputum specimens for TB testing via smear microscopy and culture. We calculated the yield and the number of households needed to screen (NHNS) to find one additional case. Predictors of new TB among household contacts were evaluated using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: We recruited 130 index cases and 282 household contacts. We identified 11 previously undiagnosed cases of bacteriologically-confirmed TB, giving a prevalence of 3.9% (95% CI: 2.0–6.9%) among contacts, a yield of 8.5 per 100 (95% CI: 4.2–15.1) index cases traced, and NHNS of 12 (95% CI: 7–24). The majority of new TB cases (10/11, 90.9%) were smear negative, culture positive. The presence of TB symptoms was not associated with an increased odds of active TB (aOR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1–1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Household contacts of recently diagnosed TB patients in rural South Africa have high prevalence of TB and can be feasibly detected through contact tracing, but more sensitive tests than sputum smear are required. Symptom screening among household contacts had low sensitivity and specificity for active TB in this study. BioMed Central 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6030742/ /pubmed/29973140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3193-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Little, Kristen M.
Msandiwa, Reginah
Martinson, Neil
Golub, Jonathan
Chaisson, Richard
Dowdy, David
Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa
title Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa
title_full Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa
title_fullStr Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa
title_short Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa
title_sort yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural south africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3193-7
work_keys_str_mv AT littlekristenm yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica
AT msandiwareginah yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica
AT martinsonneil yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica
AT golubjonathan yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica
AT chaissonrichard yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica
AT dowdydavid yieldofhouseholdcontacttracingfortuberculosisinruralsouthafrica