Cargando…

Efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations for the treatment of malaria in pregnancy in India: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In India, the recommended first-line treatment for malaria in the second and third trimester of pregnancy is artesunate + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS+SP). However, data on safety and efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in pregnancy is limited. This study assessed th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anvikar, Anupkumar R., Kuepfer, Irene, Mishra, Vinitkumar, Bruce, Jane, Arya, Tushar, Mishra, Deb Ranjan, Mohanty, Sanjib, Mohanty, Rajesh, Srivastava, Bina, Sharma, Suryakant, Mishra, Neelima, Greenwood, Brian, Chandramohan, Daniel, Valecha, Neena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2393-3
_version_ 1783337191292796928
author Anvikar, Anupkumar R.
Kuepfer, Irene
Mishra, Vinitkumar
Bruce, Jane
Arya, Tushar
Mishra, Deb Ranjan
Mohanty, Sanjib
Mohanty, Rajesh
Srivastava, Bina
Sharma, Suryakant
Mishra, Neelima
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
Valecha, Neena
author_facet Anvikar, Anupkumar R.
Kuepfer, Irene
Mishra, Vinitkumar
Bruce, Jane
Arya, Tushar
Mishra, Deb Ranjan
Mohanty, Sanjib
Mohanty, Rajesh
Srivastava, Bina
Sharma, Suryakant
Mishra, Neelima
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
Valecha, Neena
author_sort Anvikar, Anupkumar R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In India, the recommended first-line treatment for malaria in the second and third trimester of pregnancy is artesunate + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS+SP). However, data on safety and efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in pregnancy is limited. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of AS+SP and artesunate + mefloquine (AS+MQ) for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum in pregnancy in India. METHODS: This open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 2010 to December 2013 at three sites in India (Ranchi and Jamshedpur in Jharkhand state, and Rourkela in Odisha state). Pregnant women in the second or third trimester who had P. falciparum mono-infection of any parasite density with or without fever were randomized to receive AS+SP or AS+MQ. Blood slides and filter paper samples for Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) were collected on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 14, 21, 28, 42 and 63 post treatment. Women were followed up at delivery and at day 42 postpartum. FINDINGS: Two hundred and forty-eight women of 7064 pregnant women (3.5%) who were screened at monthly antenatal clinics had a P. falciparum mono-infection and were randomized to receive AS+SP (125) or AS+MQ (123) and all of these women were included in the intention to treat (ITT) analysis. The primary endpoint of an adequate clinical and parasite response (ACPR) on day 63 was not available for 9 women who were counted as treatment failure in the ITT analysis. In the ITT population, the ACPR was 121/125 (96.8%; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 92.0–99.1%) in the AS+SP group and 117/123 (95.1%; 95% CI 89.7–98.2) in the AS+MQ group. Among the 239 women (121 from the AS+SP arm and 118 from the AS+MQ arm) who completed the day 63 follow up (per protocol analysis) the ACPR was 100% in the AS+SP group and 99.2% (117/118) in the AS+MQ group. There were five serious adverse events (SAE) among pregnant women (4 in the AS+SP group and 1 in the AS+MQ group) and 13 fetal/neonatal SAEs (7 in the AS+SP group and 6 in the AS+MQ) but none of them were related to the study drugs. A higher proportion of women in the AS+MQ arm reported vomiting within 7 days post-treatment than did women in the AS+SP arm (6.9 vs. 1.6%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both AS+SP and AS+MQ are safe and effective for treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnancy in India. Trial registration CTRI This study is registered with Clinical Trial Registry India (CTRI), number CTRI/2009/091/001055. Date of Registration 11 January 2010, http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=1185&EncHid=&userName=anvikar ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-018-2393-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6030775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60307752018-07-09 Efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations for the treatment of malaria in pregnancy in India: a randomized controlled trial Anvikar, Anupkumar R. Kuepfer, Irene Mishra, Vinitkumar Bruce, Jane Arya, Tushar Mishra, Deb Ranjan Mohanty, Sanjib Mohanty, Rajesh Srivastava, Bina Sharma, Suryakant Mishra, Neelima Greenwood, Brian Chandramohan, Daniel Valecha, Neena Malar J Research BACKGROUND: In India, the recommended first-line treatment for malaria in the second and third trimester of pregnancy is artesunate + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS+SP). However, data on safety and efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in pregnancy is limited. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of AS+SP and artesunate + mefloquine (AS+MQ) for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum in pregnancy in India. METHODS: This open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 2010 to December 2013 at three sites in India (Ranchi and Jamshedpur in Jharkhand state, and Rourkela in Odisha state). Pregnant women in the second or third trimester who had P. falciparum mono-infection of any parasite density with or without fever were randomized to receive AS+SP or AS+MQ. Blood slides and filter paper samples for Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) were collected on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 14, 21, 28, 42 and 63 post treatment. Women were followed up at delivery and at day 42 postpartum. FINDINGS: Two hundred and forty-eight women of 7064 pregnant women (3.5%) who were screened at monthly antenatal clinics had a P. falciparum mono-infection and were randomized to receive AS+SP (125) or AS+MQ (123) and all of these women were included in the intention to treat (ITT) analysis. The primary endpoint of an adequate clinical and parasite response (ACPR) on day 63 was not available for 9 women who were counted as treatment failure in the ITT analysis. In the ITT population, the ACPR was 121/125 (96.8%; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 92.0–99.1%) in the AS+SP group and 117/123 (95.1%; 95% CI 89.7–98.2) in the AS+MQ group. Among the 239 women (121 from the AS+SP arm and 118 from the AS+MQ arm) who completed the day 63 follow up (per protocol analysis) the ACPR was 100% in the AS+SP group and 99.2% (117/118) in the AS+MQ group. There were five serious adverse events (SAE) among pregnant women (4 in the AS+SP group and 1 in the AS+MQ group) and 13 fetal/neonatal SAEs (7 in the AS+SP group and 6 in the AS+MQ) but none of them were related to the study drugs. A higher proportion of women in the AS+MQ arm reported vomiting within 7 days post-treatment than did women in the AS+SP arm (6.9 vs. 1.6%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both AS+SP and AS+MQ are safe and effective for treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnancy in India. Trial registration CTRI This study is registered with Clinical Trial Registry India (CTRI), number CTRI/2009/091/001055. Date of Registration 11 January 2010, http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=1185&EncHid=&userName=anvikar ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-018-2393-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6030775/ /pubmed/29973212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2393-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Anvikar, Anupkumar R.
Kuepfer, Irene
Mishra, Vinitkumar
Bruce, Jane
Arya, Tushar
Mishra, Deb Ranjan
Mohanty, Sanjib
Mohanty, Rajesh
Srivastava, Bina
Sharma, Suryakant
Mishra, Neelima
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
Valecha, Neena
Efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations for the treatment of malaria in pregnancy in India: a randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations for the treatment of malaria in pregnancy in India: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations for the treatment of malaria in pregnancy in India: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations for the treatment of malaria in pregnancy in India: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations for the treatment of malaria in pregnancy in India: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations for the treatment of malaria in pregnancy in India: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations for the treatment of malaria in pregnancy in india: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2393-3
work_keys_str_mv AT anvikaranupkumarr efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kuepferirene efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mishravinitkumar efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brucejane efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aryatushar efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mishradebranjan efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohantysanjib efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohantyrajesh efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT srivastavabina efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sharmasuryakant efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mishraneelima efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT greenwoodbrian efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chandramohandaniel efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT valechaneena efficacyoftwoartemisininbasedcombinationsforthetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyinindiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial