Cargando…

How can the risk of ovarian retorsion be reduced?

BACKGROUND: In the current treatment of idiopathic ovarian torsion, the use of oophorectomy has declined in favor of preserving the ovary. This approach brings with it the question of how to reduce the possibility of retorsion of the detorsioned ovary. The aim of this study was to analyze how retors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mehmetoğlu, Feride
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29970160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-018-1677-0
_version_ 1783337259978719232
author Mehmetoğlu, Feride
author_facet Mehmetoğlu, Feride
author_sort Mehmetoğlu, Feride
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the current treatment of idiopathic ovarian torsion, the use of oophorectomy has declined in favor of preserving the ovary. This approach brings with it the question of how to reduce the possibility of retorsion of the detorsioned ovary. The aim of this study was to analyze how retorsion can be prevented. METHODS: Five patients (a 30-day-old Caucasian girl, a 55-day-old Caucasian girl, an 8-year-old Caucasian girl, a 10-year-old Caucasian girl, and a 16-year-old Caucasian girl) who underwent surgery due to non-neoplastic ovarian torsion were retrospectively analyzed for diagnosis and treatment in terms of reducing the possibility of retorsion. RESULTS: In all patients, a precise diagnosis of idiopathic unilateral ovarian torsion was made during laparotomy, and the patients underwent different procedures. The ovary was found to be autoamputated in one patient, and two patients underwent salpingo-oophorectomies due to adnexal necrosis. The ovaries were detorsioned in the remaining two patients. During the operations, patients were evaluated regarding the prevention of retorsion of the ipsilateral and/or contralateral ovary; cyst drainage, cystectomy, ligament fixation, and/or oophoropexy were performed. The median follow-up period of the patients was 2 years (range 1.5–6 years), and they continue to be followed uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there is no standard approach to protect the ovary from retorsion in patients who undergo surgery due to torsion. The surgical procedure should be tailored on a case-by-case basis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6031141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60311412018-07-11 How can the risk of ovarian retorsion be reduced? Mehmetoğlu, Feride J Med Case Rep Research Article BACKGROUND: In the current treatment of idiopathic ovarian torsion, the use of oophorectomy has declined in favor of preserving the ovary. This approach brings with it the question of how to reduce the possibility of retorsion of the detorsioned ovary. The aim of this study was to analyze how retorsion can be prevented. METHODS: Five patients (a 30-day-old Caucasian girl, a 55-day-old Caucasian girl, an 8-year-old Caucasian girl, a 10-year-old Caucasian girl, and a 16-year-old Caucasian girl) who underwent surgery due to non-neoplastic ovarian torsion were retrospectively analyzed for diagnosis and treatment in terms of reducing the possibility of retorsion. RESULTS: In all patients, a precise diagnosis of idiopathic unilateral ovarian torsion was made during laparotomy, and the patients underwent different procedures. The ovary was found to be autoamputated in one patient, and two patients underwent salpingo-oophorectomies due to adnexal necrosis. The ovaries were detorsioned in the remaining two patients. During the operations, patients were evaluated regarding the prevention of retorsion of the ipsilateral and/or contralateral ovary; cyst drainage, cystectomy, ligament fixation, and/or oophoropexy were performed. The median follow-up period of the patients was 2 years (range 1.5–6 years), and they continue to be followed uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there is no standard approach to protect the ovary from retorsion in patients who undergo surgery due to torsion. The surgical procedure should be tailored on a case-by-case basis. BioMed Central 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6031141/ /pubmed/29970160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-018-1677-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mehmetoğlu, Feride
How can the risk of ovarian retorsion be reduced?
title How can the risk of ovarian retorsion be reduced?
title_full How can the risk of ovarian retorsion be reduced?
title_fullStr How can the risk of ovarian retorsion be reduced?
title_full_unstemmed How can the risk of ovarian retorsion be reduced?
title_short How can the risk of ovarian retorsion be reduced?
title_sort how can the risk of ovarian retorsion be reduced?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29970160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-018-1677-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmetogluferide howcantheriskofovarianretorsionbereduced