Cargando…

Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and risks of bleeding, ischaemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and all cause mortality compared with warfarin. DESIGN: Prospective open cohort study. SETTING: UK general practices contributing to QResearch or Cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vinogradova, Yana, Coupland, Carol, Hill, Trevor, Hippisley-Cox, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2505
_version_ 1783337276721332224
author Vinogradova, Yana
Coupland, Carol
Hill, Trevor
Hippisley-Cox, Julia
author_facet Vinogradova, Yana
Coupland, Carol
Hill, Trevor
Hippisley-Cox, Julia
author_sort Vinogradova, Yana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and risks of bleeding, ischaemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and all cause mortality compared with warfarin. DESIGN: Prospective open cohort study. SETTING: UK general practices contributing to QResearch or Clinical Practice Research Datalink. PARTICIPANTS: 132 231 warfarin, 7744 dabigatran, 37 863 rivaroxaban, and 18 223 apixaban users without anticoagulant prescriptions for 12 months before study entry, subgrouped into 103 270 patients with atrial fibrillation and 92 791 without atrial fibrillation between 2011 and 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Major bleeding leading to hospital admission or death. Specific sites of bleeding and all cause mortality were also studied. RESULTS: In patients with atrial fibrillation, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.79) and intracranial bleeding (0.40, 0.25 to 0.64); dabigatran was associated with a decreased risk of intracranial bleeding (0.45, 0.26 to 0.77). An increased risk of all cause mortality was observed in patients taking rivaroxaban (1.19, 1.09 to 1.29) or on lower doses of apixaban (1.27, 1.12 to 1.45). In patients without atrial fibrillation, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (0.60, 0.46 to 0.79), any gastrointestinal bleeding (0.55, 0.37 to 0.83), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (0.55, 0.36 to 0.83); rivaroxaban was associated with a decreased risk of intracranial bleeding (0.54, 0.35 to 0.82). Increased risk of all cause mortality was observed in patients taking rivaroxaban (1.51, 1.38 to 1.66) and those on lower doses of apixaban (1.34, 1.13 to 1.58). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, apixaban was found to be the safest drug, with reduced risks of major, intracranial, and gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin. Rivaroxaban and low dose apixaban were, however, associated with increased risks of all cause mortality compared with warfarin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6031213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60312132018-07-09 Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care Vinogradova, Yana Coupland, Carol Hill, Trevor Hippisley-Cox, Julia BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and risks of bleeding, ischaemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and all cause mortality compared with warfarin. DESIGN: Prospective open cohort study. SETTING: UK general practices contributing to QResearch or Clinical Practice Research Datalink. PARTICIPANTS: 132 231 warfarin, 7744 dabigatran, 37 863 rivaroxaban, and 18 223 apixaban users without anticoagulant prescriptions for 12 months before study entry, subgrouped into 103 270 patients with atrial fibrillation and 92 791 without atrial fibrillation between 2011 and 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Major bleeding leading to hospital admission or death. Specific sites of bleeding and all cause mortality were also studied. RESULTS: In patients with atrial fibrillation, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.79) and intracranial bleeding (0.40, 0.25 to 0.64); dabigatran was associated with a decreased risk of intracranial bleeding (0.45, 0.26 to 0.77). An increased risk of all cause mortality was observed in patients taking rivaroxaban (1.19, 1.09 to 1.29) or on lower doses of apixaban (1.27, 1.12 to 1.45). In patients without atrial fibrillation, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (0.60, 0.46 to 0.79), any gastrointestinal bleeding (0.55, 0.37 to 0.83), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (0.55, 0.36 to 0.83); rivaroxaban was associated with a decreased risk of intracranial bleeding (0.54, 0.35 to 0.82). Increased risk of all cause mortality was observed in patients taking rivaroxaban (1.51, 1.38 to 1.66) and those on lower doses of apixaban (1.34, 1.13 to 1.58). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, apixaban was found to be the safest drug, with reduced risks of major, intracranial, and gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin. Rivaroxaban and low dose apixaban were, however, associated with increased risks of all cause mortality compared with warfarin. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6031213/ /pubmed/29973392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2505 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Vinogradova, Yana
Coupland, Carol
Hill, Trevor
Hippisley-Cox, Julia
Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care
title Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care
title_full Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care
title_fullStr Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care
title_short Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care
title_sort risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2505
work_keys_str_mv AT vinogradovayana risksandbenefitsofdirectoralanticoagulantsversuswarfarininarealworldsettingcohortstudyinprimarycare
AT couplandcarol risksandbenefitsofdirectoralanticoagulantsversuswarfarininarealworldsettingcohortstudyinprimarycare
AT hilltrevor risksandbenefitsofdirectoralanticoagulantsversuswarfarininarealworldsettingcohortstudyinprimarycare
AT hippisleycoxjulia risksandbenefitsofdirectoralanticoagulantsversuswarfarininarealworldsettingcohortstudyinprimarycare