Cargando…

Clinical attitudes and perceived barriers to early mobilization of critically ill patients in adult intensive care units

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the knowledge of multi-professional staff members about the early mobilization of critically ill adult patients and identify attitudes and perceived barriers to its application. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted during the second semester of 2016 with physician...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fontela, Paula Caitano, Forgiarini Jr., Luiz Alberto, Friedman, Gilberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995084
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20180037
_version_ 1783337314206875648
author Fontela, Paula Caitano
Forgiarini Jr., Luiz Alberto
Friedman, Gilberto
author_facet Fontela, Paula Caitano
Forgiarini Jr., Luiz Alberto
Friedman, Gilberto
author_sort Fontela, Paula Caitano
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the knowledge of multi-professional staff members about the early mobilization of critically ill adult patients and identify attitudes and perceived barriers to its application. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted during the second semester of 2016 with physicians, nursing professionals and physical therapists from six intensive care units at two teaching hospitals. Questions were answered on a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed as proportions of professionals who agreed or disagreed with statements. The chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to investigate differences in the responses according to educational/training level, previous experience with early mobilization and years of experience in intensive care units. RESULTS: The questionnaire was answered by 98 out of 514 professionals (response rate: 19%). The acknowledged benefits of early mobilization were maintenance of muscle strength (53%) and shortened length of mechanical ventilation (83%). Favorable attitudes toward early mobilization included recognition that its benefits for patients under mechanical ventilation exceed the risks for both patients and staff, that early mobilization should be routinely performed via nursing and physical therapy protocols, and readiness to change the parameters of mechanical ventilation and reduce sedation to facilitate the early mobilization of patients. The main barriers mentioned were the unavailability of professionals and time to mobilize patients, excessive sedation, delirium, risk of musculoskeletal self-injury and excessive stress at work. CONCLUSION: The participants were aware of the benefits of early mobilization and manifested attitudes favorable to its application. However, the actual performance of early mobilization was perceived as a challenge, mainly due to the lack of professionals and time, excessive sedation, delirium, risk of musculoskeletal self-injury and excessive stress at work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6031424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60314242018-07-10 Clinical attitudes and perceived barriers to early mobilization of critically ill patients in adult intensive care units Fontela, Paula Caitano Forgiarini Jr., Luiz Alberto Friedman, Gilberto Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To investigate the knowledge of multi-professional staff members about the early mobilization of critically ill adult patients and identify attitudes and perceived barriers to its application. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted during the second semester of 2016 with physicians, nursing professionals and physical therapists from six intensive care units at two teaching hospitals. Questions were answered on a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed as proportions of professionals who agreed or disagreed with statements. The chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to investigate differences in the responses according to educational/training level, previous experience with early mobilization and years of experience in intensive care units. RESULTS: The questionnaire was answered by 98 out of 514 professionals (response rate: 19%). The acknowledged benefits of early mobilization were maintenance of muscle strength (53%) and shortened length of mechanical ventilation (83%). Favorable attitudes toward early mobilization included recognition that its benefits for patients under mechanical ventilation exceed the risks for both patients and staff, that early mobilization should be routinely performed via nursing and physical therapy protocols, and readiness to change the parameters of mechanical ventilation and reduce sedation to facilitate the early mobilization of patients. The main barriers mentioned were the unavailability of professionals and time to mobilize patients, excessive sedation, delirium, risk of musculoskeletal self-injury and excessive stress at work. CONCLUSION: The participants were aware of the benefits of early mobilization and manifested attitudes favorable to its application. However, the actual performance of early mobilization was perceived as a challenge, mainly due to the lack of professionals and time, excessive sedation, delirium, risk of musculoskeletal self-injury and excessive stress at work. Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6031424/ /pubmed/29995084 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20180037 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fontela, Paula Caitano
Forgiarini Jr., Luiz Alberto
Friedman, Gilberto
Clinical attitudes and perceived barriers to early mobilization of critically ill patients in adult intensive care units
title Clinical attitudes and perceived barriers to early mobilization of critically ill patients in adult intensive care units
title_full Clinical attitudes and perceived barriers to early mobilization of critically ill patients in adult intensive care units
title_fullStr Clinical attitudes and perceived barriers to early mobilization of critically ill patients in adult intensive care units
title_full_unstemmed Clinical attitudes and perceived barriers to early mobilization of critically ill patients in adult intensive care units
title_short Clinical attitudes and perceived barriers to early mobilization of critically ill patients in adult intensive care units
title_sort clinical attitudes and perceived barriers to early mobilization of critically ill patients in adult intensive care units
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995084
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20180037
work_keys_str_mv AT fontelapaulacaitano clinicalattitudesandperceivedbarrierstoearlymobilizationofcriticallyillpatientsinadultintensivecareunits
AT forgiarinijrluizalberto clinicalattitudesandperceivedbarrierstoearlymobilizationofcriticallyillpatientsinadultintensivecareunits
AT friedmangilberto clinicalattitudesandperceivedbarrierstoearlymobilizationofcriticallyillpatientsinadultintensivecareunits