Cargando…

Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway – a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Incomplete polyp removal has been estimated to cause 27 % of all colorectal cancers detected soon after colonoscopy. There is limited information regarding polypectomy techniques among endoscopists. The article is a nationwide survey of polypectomy techniques among Norweg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedersen, Ina B., Løberg, Magnus, Hoff, Geir, Kalager, Mette, Bretthauer, Michael, Holme, Øyvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0607-0727
_version_ 1783337317726945280
author Pedersen, Ina B.
Løberg, Magnus
Hoff, Geir
Kalager, Mette
Bretthauer, Michael
Holme, Øyvind
author_facet Pedersen, Ina B.
Løberg, Magnus
Hoff, Geir
Kalager, Mette
Bretthauer, Michael
Holme, Øyvind
author_sort Pedersen, Ina B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Incomplete polyp removal has been estimated to cause 27 % of all colorectal cancers detected soon after colonoscopy. There is limited information regarding polypectomy techniques among endoscopists. The article is a nationwide survey of polypectomy techniques among Norwegian endoscopists. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  We invited all board-certified gastroenterologists in Norway to complete a web-based questionnaire about their polypectomy technique. Inadequate polypectomy techniques were defined as using biopsy forceps for polyps larger than 3 mm in diameter, using hot biopsy forceps for polypectomy, and using the same electrocautery output irrespective of polyp size and morphology. RESULTS : Twenty-six of 30 Norwegian gastroenterology departments participated in the study. A total of 119 endoscopists received the survey, and 70 (59 %) responded. Mean duration of endoscopy practice was 11.5 years, and 95 % had performed more than 1,000 colonoscopies during their career. Twenty-eight endoscopists (40 %) used one or more inadequate polypectomy techniques: 10 (14.3 %) used biopsy forceps for removal of polyps larger than 3 mm in diameter, five (7.1 %) used hot biopsy for polypectomy, and 17 (24 %) used the same electrocautery output for all polypectomies. Five (7 %) endoscopists reported that they did not remove polyps smaller than 4 mm. CONCLUSION:  A substantial number of Norwegian endoscopists use inadequate polypectomy techniques. Improved training and certification of endoscopists is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6031440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60314402018-07-05 Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway – a nationwide survey Pedersen, Ina B. Løberg, Magnus Hoff, Geir Kalager, Mette Bretthauer, Michael Holme, Øyvind Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Incomplete polyp removal has been estimated to cause 27 % of all colorectal cancers detected soon after colonoscopy. There is limited information regarding polypectomy techniques among endoscopists. The article is a nationwide survey of polypectomy techniques among Norwegian endoscopists. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  We invited all board-certified gastroenterologists in Norway to complete a web-based questionnaire about their polypectomy technique. Inadequate polypectomy techniques were defined as using biopsy forceps for polyps larger than 3 mm in diameter, using hot biopsy forceps for polypectomy, and using the same electrocautery output irrespective of polyp size and morphology. RESULTS : Twenty-six of 30 Norwegian gastroenterology departments participated in the study. A total of 119 endoscopists received the survey, and 70 (59 %) responded. Mean duration of endoscopy practice was 11.5 years, and 95 % had performed more than 1,000 colonoscopies during their career. Twenty-eight endoscopists (40 %) used one or more inadequate polypectomy techniques: 10 (14.3 %) used biopsy forceps for removal of polyps larger than 3 mm in diameter, five (7.1 %) used hot biopsy for polypectomy, and 17 (24 %) used the same electrocautery output for all polypectomies. Five (7 %) endoscopists reported that they did not remove polyps smaller than 4 mm. CONCLUSION:  A substantial number of Norwegian endoscopists use inadequate polypectomy techniques. Improved training and certification of endoscopists is warranted. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-07 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6031440/ /pubmed/29977999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0607-0727 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Pedersen, Ina B.
Løberg, Magnus
Hoff, Geir
Kalager, Mette
Bretthauer, Michael
Holme, Øyvind
Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway – a nationwide survey
title Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway – a nationwide survey
title_full Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway – a nationwide survey
title_fullStr Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway – a nationwide survey
title_full_unstemmed Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway – a nationwide survey
title_short Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway – a nationwide survey
title_sort polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in norway – a nationwide survey
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0607-0727
work_keys_str_mv AT pederseninab polypectomytechniquesamonggastroenterologistsinnorwayanationwidesurvey
AT løbergmagnus polypectomytechniquesamonggastroenterologistsinnorwayanationwidesurvey
AT hoffgeir polypectomytechniquesamonggastroenterologistsinnorwayanationwidesurvey
AT kalagermette polypectomytechniquesamonggastroenterologistsinnorwayanationwidesurvey
AT bretthauermichael polypectomytechniquesamonggastroenterologistsinnorwayanationwidesurvey
AT holmeøyvind polypectomytechniquesamonggastroenterologistsinnorwayanationwidesurvey