Cargando…

Comparison between sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review with an indirect comparison meta‐analysis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone (PIO) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as additions to insulin therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Registe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Yun Kyung, Kim, Ye‐Jee, Kang, Yu Mi, Lee, Seung Eun, Park, Joong‐Yeol, Lee, Woo Je, Jung, Chang Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29215196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12787
_version_ 1783337323784568832
author Cho, Yun Kyung
Kim, Ye‐Jee
Kang, Yu Mi
Lee, Seung Eun
Park, Joong‐Yeol
Lee, Woo Je
Jung, Chang Hee
author_facet Cho, Yun Kyung
Kim, Ye‐Jee
Kang, Yu Mi
Lee, Seung Eun
Park, Joong‐Yeol
Lee, Woo Je
Jung, Chang Hee
author_sort Cho, Yun Kyung
collection PubMed
description AIMS/INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone (PIO) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as additions to insulin therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2016. Randomized controlled trials published in English that compared SGLT2i plus insulin (SGLT2i/INS) or PIO plus insulin (PIO/INS) with placebo plus insulin (PCB/INS) in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were included. We compared the efficacy and safety between SGLT2i/INS and PIO/INS indirectly. RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials comparing 7,226 participants were included (8 SGLT2i and 6 PIO studies). SGLT2i/INS achieved similar reductions in hemoglobin A1c (weighted mean difference [WMD] −0.01% [−0.1 mmol/mol], 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.25 to 0.22% [−2.7 to −2.4 mmol/mol]; P = 0.896) and fasting plasma glucose (WMD −0.90 mg/dL, 95% CI: −15.50 to 13.71 mg/dL; P = 0.904), and a similar proportion of participants achieved hemoglobin A1c <7.0% (<53.0 mmol/mol; relative risk 0.98, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.33; P = 0.917) as compared with the PIO/INS group, with greater weight reduction (WMD −4.54 kg, 95% CI: −5.67 to −3.41 kg; P < 0.001). PIO/INS showed non‐significant trends toward a higher risk of hypoglycemia (relative risk 1.15, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.35; P = 0.102) and higher reduction of total daily insulin doses (WMD −2.45 IU/day, 95% CI: −7.30 to 2.40 IU/day; P = 0.438). CONCLUSIONS: Both PIO and SGLT2i are feasible adjunctive oral agents to pre‐existing insulin therapy in individuals with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6031497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60314972018-07-11 Comparison between sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review with an indirect comparison meta‐analysis Cho, Yun Kyung Kim, Ye‐Jee Kang, Yu Mi Lee, Seung Eun Park, Joong‐Yeol Lee, Woo Je Jung, Chang Hee J Diabetes Investig Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone (PIO) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as additions to insulin therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2016. Randomized controlled trials published in English that compared SGLT2i plus insulin (SGLT2i/INS) or PIO plus insulin (PIO/INS) with placebo plus insulin (PCB/INS) in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were included. We compared the efficacy and safety between SGLT2i/INS and PIO/INS indirectly. RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials comparing 7,226 participants were included (8 SGLT2i and 6 PIO studies). SGLT2i/INS achieved similar reductions in hemoglobin A1c (weighted mean difference [WMD] −0.01% [−0.1 mmol/mol], 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.25 to 0.22% [−2.7 to −2.4 mmol/mol]; P = 0.896) and fasting plasma glucose (WMD −0.90 mg/dL, 95% CI: −15.50 to 13.71 mg/dL; P = 0.904), and a similar proportion of participants achieved hemoglobin A1c <7.0% (<53.0 mmol/mol; relative risk 0.98, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.33; P = 0.917) as compared with the PIO/INS group, with greater weight reduction (WMD −4.54 kg, 95% CI: −5.67 to −3.41 kg; P < 0.001). PIO/INS showed non‐significant trends toward a higher risk of hypoglycemia (relative risk 1.15, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.35; P = 0.102) and higher reduction of total daily insulin doses (WMD −2.45 IU/day, 95% CI: −7.30 to 2.40 IU/day; P = 0.438). CONCLUSIONS: Both PIO and SGLT2i are feasible adjunctive oral agents to pre‐existing insulin therapy in individuals with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-08 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6031497/ /pubmed/29215196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12787 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Articles
Cho, Yun Kyung
Kim, Ye‐Jee
Kang, Yu Mi
Lee, Seung Eun
Park, Joong‐Yeol
Lee, Woo Je
Jung, Chang Hee
Comparison between sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review with an indirect comparison meta‐analysis
title Comparison between sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review with an indirect comparison meta‐analysis
title_full Comparison between sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review with an indirect comparison meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Comparison between sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review with an indirect comparison meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review with an indirect comparison meta‐analysis
title_short Comparison between sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review with an indirect comparison meta‐analysis
title_sort comparison between sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review with an indirect comparison meta‐analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29215196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12787
work_keys_str_mv AT choyunkyung comparisonbetweensodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsandpioglitazoneasadditionstoinsulintherapyintype2diabetespatientsasystematicreviewwithanindirectcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT kimyejee comparisonbetweensodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsandpioglitazoneasadditionstoinsulintherapyintype2diabetespatientsasystematicreviewwithanindirectcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT kangyumi comparisonbetweensodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsandpioglitazoneasadditionstoinsulintherapyintype2diabetespatientsasystematicreviewwithanindirectcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT leeseungeun comparisonbetweensodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsandpioglitazoneasadditionstoinsulintherapyintype2diabetespatientsasystematicreviewwithanindirectcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT parkjoongyeol comparisonbetweensodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsandpioglitazoneasadditionstoinsulintherapyintype2diabetespatientsasystematicreviewwithanindirectcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT leewooje comparisonbetweensodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsandpioglitazoneasadditionstoinsulintherapyintype2diabetespatientsasystematicreviewwithanindirectcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT jungchanghee comparisonbetweensodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsandpioglitazoneasadditionstoinsulintherapyintype2diabetespatientsasystematicreviewwithanindirectcomparisonmetaanalysis