Cargando…
Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: The quality and state of satisfaction reporting after total knee replacement (TKR) is variable. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this systematic review were (1) to examine the available literature on patient satisfaction after TKR, (2) to evaluate the quality of available evidence, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8 |
_version_ | 1783337330896011264 |
---|---|
author | Kahlenberg, Cynthia A. Nwachukwu, Benedict U. McLawhorn, Alexander S. Cross, Michael B. Cornell, Charles N. Padgett, Douglas E. |
author_facet | Kahlenberg, Cynthia A. Nwachukwu, Benedict U. McLawhorn, Alexander S. Cross, Michael B. Cornell, Charles N. Padgett, Douglas E. |
author_sort | Kahlenberg, Cynthia A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The quality and state of satisfaction reporting after total knee replacement (TKR) is variable. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this systematic review were (1) to examine the available literature on patient satisfaction after TKR, (2) to evaluate the quality of available evidence, and (3) to identify predictors of patient satisfaction after TKR. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed. The initial search yielded 1219 studies. The inclusion criteria were English language, clinical outcome study with primary outcome related to TKR for osteoarthritis, and patient-reported satisfaction included as an outcome measure. Studies were assessed for demographics, methodology for reporting satisfaction, and factors influencing satisfaction. RESULTS: Two hundred eight studies, including 95,560 patients who had undergone TKR, met all inclusion and exclusion criteria; 112 (53.8%) of these studies were published in the past 3 years. Satisfaction was most commonly measured using an ordinal scale. Twenty-seven studies (13%) used a validated satisfaction survey. Eighty-three percent of studies reported more than 80% satisfaction. The most commonly reported predictor of satisfaction was post-operative patient-reported functional outcome. Pre-operative anxiety/depression was the most common pre-operative predictor of dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: There are numerous studies reporting patient satisfaction after TKR, and publication on the topic has been increasing over the past decade. However, the majority of studies represent lower levels of evidence and use heterogeneous methods for measuring satisfaction, and few studies use validated satisfaction instruments. In general, the majority of studies report satisfaction rates ranging from 80 to 100%, with post-operative functional outcome and relief of pain being paramount determinants for achieving satisfaction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6031540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60315402018-07-06 Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review Kahlenberg, Cynthia A. Nwachukwu, Benedict U. McLawhorn, Alexander S. Cross, Michael B. Cornell, Charles N. Padgett, Douglas E. HSS J Review Article/CME BACKGROUND: The quality and state of satisfaction reporting after total knee replacement (TKR) is variable. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this systematic review were (1) to examine the available literature on patient satisfaction after TKR, (2) to evaluate the quality of available evidence, and (3) to identify predictors of patient satisfaction after TKR. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed. The initial search yielded 1219 studies. The inclusion criteria were English language, clinical outcome study with primary outcome related to TKR for osteoarthritis, and patient-reported satisfaction included as an outcome measure. Studies were assessed for demographics, methodology for reporting satisfaction, and factors influencing satisfaction. RESULTS: Two hundred eight studies, including 95,560 patients who had undergone TKR, met all inclusion and exclusion criteria; 112 (53.8%) of these studies were published in the past 3 years. Satisfaction was most commonly measured using an ordinal scale. Twenty-seven studies (13%) used a validated satisfaction survey. Eighty-three percent of studies reported more than 80% satisfaction. The most commonly reported predictor of satisfaction was post-operative patient-reported functional outcome. Pre-operative anxiety/depression was the most common pre-operative predictor of dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: There are numerous studies reporting patient satisfaction after TKR, and publication on the topic has been increasing over the past decade. However, the majority of studies represent lower levels of evidence and use heterogeneous methods for measuring satisfaction, and few studies use validated satisfaction instruments. In general, the majority of studies report satisfaction rates ranging from 80 to 100%, with post-operative functional outcome and relief of pain being paramount determinants for achieving satisfaction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-06-05 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6031540/ /pubmed/29983663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article/CME Kahlenberg, Cynthia A. Nwachukwu, Benedict U. McLawhorn, Alexander S. Cross, Michael B. Cornell, Charles N. Padgett, Douglas E. Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review |
title | Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article/CME |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kahlenbergcynthiaa patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT nwachukwubenedictu patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT mclawhornalexanders patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT crossmichaelb patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT cornellcharlesn patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT padgettdouglase patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview |