Cargando…

Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The quality and state of satisfaction reporting after total knee replacement (TKR) is variable. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this systematic review were (1) to examine the available literature on patient satisfaction after TKR, (2) to evaluate the quality of available evidence, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kahlenberg, Cynthia A., Nwachukwu, Benedict U., McLawhorn, Alexander S., Cross, Michael B., Cornell, Charles N., Padgett, Douglas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8
_version_ 1783337330896011264
author Kahlenberg, Cynthia A.
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
McLawhorn, Alexander S.
Cross, Michael B.
Cornell, Charles N.
Padgett, Douglas E.
author_facet Kahlenberg, Cynthia A.
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
McLawhorn, Alexander S.
Cross, Michael B.
Cornell, Charles N.
Padgett, Douglas E.
author_sort Kahlenberg, Cynthia A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quality and state of satisfaction reporting after total knee replacement (TKR) is variable. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this systematic review were (1) to examine the available literature on patient satisfaction after TKR, (2) to evaluate the quality of available evidence, and (3) to identify predictors of patient satisfaction after TKR. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed. The initial search yielded 1219 studies. The inclusion criteria were English language, clinical outcome study with primary outcome related to TKR for osteoarthritis, and patient-reported satisfaction included as an outcome measure. Studies were assessed for demographics, methodology for reporting satisfaction, and factors influencing satisfaction. RESULTS: Two hundred eight studies, including 95,560 patients who had undergone TKR, met all inclusion and exclusion criteria; 112 (53.8%) of these studies were published in the past 3 years. Satisfaction was most commonly measured using an ordinal scale. Twenty-seven studies (13%) used a validated satisfaction survey. Eighty-three percent of studies reported more than 80% satisfaction. The most commonly reported predictor of satisfaction was post-operative patient-reported functional outcome. Pre-operative anxiety/depression was the most common pre-operative predictor of dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: There are numerous studies reporting patient satisfaction after TKR, and publication on the topic has been increasing over the past decade. However, the majority of studies represent lower levels of evidence and use heterogeneous methods for measuring satisfaction, and few studies use validated satisfaction instruments. In general, the majority of studies report satisfaction rates ranging from 80 to 100%, with post-operative functional outcome and relief of pain being paramount determinants for achieving satisfaction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6031540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60315402018-07-06 Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review Kahlenberg, Cynthia A. Nwachukwu, Benedict U. McLawhorn, Alexander S. Cross, Michael B. Cornell, Charles N. Padgett, Douglas E. HSS J Review Article/CME BACKGROUND: The quality and state of satisfaction reporting after total knee replacement (TKR) is variable. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this systematic review were (1) to examine the available literature on patient satisfaction after TKR, (2) to evaluate the quality of available evidence, and (3) to identify predictors of patient satisfaction after TKR. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed. The initial search yielded 1219 studies. The inclusion criteria were English language, clinical outcome study with primary outcome related to TKR for osteoarthritis, and patient-reported satisfaction included as an outcome measure. Studies were assessed for demographics, methodology for reporting satisfaction, and factors influencing satisfaction. RESULTS: Two hundred eight studies, including 95,560 patients who had undergone TKR, met all inclusion and exclusion criteria; 112 (53.8%) of these studies were published in the past 3 years. Satisfaction was most commonly measured using an ordinal scale. Twenty-seven studies (13%) used a validated satisfaction survey. Eighty-three percent of studies reported more than 80% satisfaction. The most commonly reported predictor of satisfaction was post-operative patient-reported functional outcome. Pre-operative anxiety/depression was the most common pre-operative predictor of dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: There are numerous studies reporting patient satisfaction after TKR, and publication on the topic has been increasing over the past decade. However, the majority of studies represent lower levels of evidence and use heterogeneous methods for measuring satisfaction, and few studies use validated satisfaction instruments. In general, the majority of studies report satisfaction rates ranging from 80 to 100%, with post-operative functional outcome and relief of pain being paramount determinants for achieving satisfaction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-06-05 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6031540/ /pubmed/29983663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article/CME
Kahlenberg, Cynthia A.
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
McLawhorn, Alexander S.
Cross, Michael B.
Cornell, Charles N.
Padgett, Douglas E.
Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review
title Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review
title_full Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review
title_short Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review
title_sort patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: a systematic review
topic Review Article/CME
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kahlenbergcynthiaa patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT nwachukwubenedictu patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT mclawhornalexanders patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT crossmichaelb patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT cornellcharlesn patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT padgettdouglase patientsatisfactionaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview