Cargando…
Across-subject offline decoding of motor imagery from MEG and EEG
Long calibration time hinders the feasibility of brain-computer interfaces (BCI). If other subjects’ data were used for training the classifier, BCI-based neurofeedback practice could start without the initial calibration. Here, we compare methods for inter-subject decoding of left- vs. right-hand m...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28295-z |
_version_ | 1783337354084220928 |
---|---|
author | Halme, Hanna-Leena Parkkonen, Lauri |
author_facet | Halme, Hanna-Leena Parkkonen, Lauri |
author_sort | Halme, Hanna-Leena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Long calibration time hinders the feasibility of brain-computer interfaces (BCI). If other subjects’ data were used for training the classifier, BCI-based neurofeedback practice could start without the initial calibration. Here, we compare methods for inter-subject decoding of left- vs. right-hand motor imagery (MI) from MEG and EEG. Six methods were tested on data involving MEG and EEG measurements of healthy participants. Inter-subject decoders were trained on subjects showing good within-subject accuracy, and tested on all subjects, including poor performers. Three methods were based on Common Spatial Patterns (CSP), and three others on logistic regression with l(1) - or l(2,1) -norm regularization. The decoding accuracy was evaluated using (1) MI and (2) passive movements (PM) for training, separately for MEG and EEG. With MI training, the best accuracies across subjects (mean 70.6% for MEG, 67.7% for EEG) were obtained using multi-task learning (MTL) with logistic regression and l(2,1)-norm regularization. MEG yielded slightly better average accuracies than EEG. With PM training, none of the inter-subject methods yielded above chance level (58.7%) accuracy. In conclusion, MTL and training with other subject’s MI is efficient for inter-subject decoding of MI. Passive movements of other subjects are likely suboptimal for training the MI classifiers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6031658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60316582018-07-12 Across-subject offline decoding of motor imagery from MEG and EEG Halme, Hanna-Leena Parkkonen, Lauri Sci Rep Article Long calibration time hinders the feasibility of brain-computer interfaces (BCI). If other subjects’ data were used for training the classifier, BCI-based neurofeedback practice could start without the initial calibration. Here, we compare methods for inter-subject decoding of left- vs. right-hand motor imagery (MI) from MEG and EEG. Six methods were tested on data involving MEG and EEG measurements of healthy participants. Inter-subject decoders were trained on subjects showing good within-subject accuracy, and tested on all subjects, including poor performers. Three methods were based on Common Spatial Patterns (CSP), and three others on logistic regression with l(1) - or l(2,1) -norm regularization. The decoding accuracy was evaluated using (1) MI and (2) passive movements (PM) for training, separately for MEG and EEG. With MI training, the best accuracies across subjects (mean 70.6% for MEG, 67.7% for EEG) were obtained using multi-task learning (MTL) with logistic regression and l(2,1)-norm regularization. MEG yielded slightly better average accuracies than EEG. With PM training, none of the inter-subject methods yielded above chance level (58.7%) accuracy. In conclusion, MTL and training with other subject’s MI is efficient for inter-subject decoding of MI. Passive movements of other subjects are likely suboptimal for training the MI classifiers. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6031658/ /pubmed/29973645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28295-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Halme, Hanna-Leena Parkkonen, Lauri Across-subject offline decoding of motor imagery from MEG and EEG |
title | Across-subject offline decoding of motor imagery from MEG and EEG |
title_full | Across-subject offline decoding of motor imagery from MEG and EEG |
title_fullStr | Across-subject offline decoding of motor imagery from MEG and EEG |
title_full_unstemmed | Across-subject offline decoding of motor imagery from MEG and EEG |
title_short | Across-subject offline decoding of motor imagery from MEG and EEG |
title_sort | across-subject offline decoding of motor imagery from meg and eeg |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28295-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halmehannaleena acrosssubjectofflinedecodingofmotorimageryfrommegandeeg AT parkkonenlauri acrosssubjectofflinedecodingofmotorimageryfrommegandeeg |