Cargando…

Testing of a Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions in Primary Care

BACKGROUND: As prostate cancer (PCa) screening decisions often occur in outpatient primary care, a brief tool to help the PCa screening conversation in busy clinic settings is needed. METHODS: A previously created 9-item tool to aid PCa screening discussions was tested in five diverse primary care c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Misra-Hebert, Anita D., Hom, Grant, Klein, Eric A., Bauman, Janine M., Gupta, Niyati, Ji, Xinge, Stephenson, Andrew J., Jones, J. Stephen, Kattan, Michael W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30003062
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00238
_version_ 1783337365486436352
author Misra-Hebert, Anita D.
Hom, Grant
Klein, Eric A.
Bauman, Janine M.
Gupta, Niyati
Ji, Xinge
Stephenson, Andrew J.
Jones, J. Stephen
Kattan, Michael W.
author_facet Misra-Hebert, Anita D.
Hom, Grant
Klein, Eric A.
Bauman, Janine M.
Gupta, Niyati
Ji, Xinge
Stephenson, Andrew J.
Jones, J. Stephen
Kattan, Michael W.
author_sort Misra-Hebert, Anita D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As prostate cancer (PCa) screening decisions often occur in outpatient primary care, a brief tool to help the PCa screening conversation in busy clinic settings is needed. METHODS: A previously created 9-item tool to aid PCa screening discussions was tested in five diverse primary care clinics. Fifteen providers were recruited to use the tool for 4 weeks, and the tool was revised based upon feedback. The providers then used the tool with a convenience sample of patients during routine clinic visits. Pre- and post-visit surveys were administered to assess patients’ knowledge of the option to be screened for PCa and of specific factors to consider in the decision. McNemar’s and Stuart–Maxwell tests were used to compare pre-and post-survey responses. RESULTS: 14 of 15 providers completed feedback surveys and had positive responses to the tool. All 15 providers then tested the tool on 95 men aged 40–69 at the five clinics with 2–10 patients each. The proportion of patients who strongly agreed that they had the option to choose to screen for PCa increased from 57 to 72% (p = 0.018) from the pre- to post-survey, that there are factors in the personal or family history that may affect PCa risk from 34 to 47% (p = 0.012), and that their opinions about possible side effects of treatment for PCa should be considered in the decision from 47 to 61% (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: A brief conversation tool for the PCa screening discussion was well received in busy primary-care settings and improved patients’ knowledge about the screening decision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6031706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60317062018-07-12 Testing of a Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions in Primary Care Misra-Hebert, Anita D. Hom, Grant Klein, Eric A. Bauman, Janine M. Gupta, Niyati Ji, Xinge Stephenson, Andrew J. Jones, J. Stephen Kattan, Michael W. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: As prostate cancer (PCa) screening decisions often occur in outpatient primary care, a brief tool to help the PCa screening conversation in busy clinic settings is needed. METHODS: A previously created 9-item tool to aid PCa screening discussions was tested in five diverse primary care clinics. Fifteen providers were recruited to use the tool for 4 weeks, and the tool was revised based upon feedback. The providers then used the tool with a convenience sample of patients during routine clinic visits. Pre- and post-visit surveys were administered to assess patients’ knowledge of the option to be screened for PCa and of specific factors to consider in the decision. McNemar’s and Stuart–Maxwell tests were used to compare pre-and post-survey responses. RESULTS: 14 of 15 providers completed feedback surveys and had positive responses to the tool. All 15 providers then tested the tool on 95 men aged 40–69 at the five clinics with 2–10 patients each. The proportion of patients who strongly agreed that they had the option to choose to screen for PCa increased from 57 to 72% (p = 0.018) from the pre- to post-survey, that there are factors in the personal or family history that may affect PCa risk from 34 to 47% (p = 0.012), and that their opinions about possible side effects of treatment for PCa should be considered in the decision from 47 to 61% (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: A brief conversation tool for the PCa screening discussion was well received in busy primary-care settings and improved patients’ knowledge about the screening decision. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6031706/ /pubmed/30003062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00238 Text en Copyright © 2018 Misra-Hebert, Hom, Klein, Bauman, Gupta, Ji, Stephenson, Jones and Kattan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Misra-Hebert, Anita D.
Hom, Grant
Klein, Eric A.
Bauman, Janine M.
Gupta, Niyati
Ji, Xinge
Stephenson, Andrew J.
Jones, J. Stephen
Kattan, Michael W.
Testing of a Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions in Primary Care
title Testing of a Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions in Primary Care
title_full Testing of a Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions in Primary Care
title_fullStr Testing of a Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions in Primary Care
title_full_unstemmed Testing of a Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions in Primary Care
title_short Testing of a Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions in Primary Care
title_sort testing of a tool for prostate cancer screening discussions in primary care
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30003062
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00238
work_keys_str_mv AT misrahebertanitad testingofatoolforprostatecancerscreeningdiscussionsinprimarycare
AT homgrant testingofatoolforprostatecancerscreeningdiscussionsinprimarycare
AT kleinerica testingofatoolforprostatecancerscreeningdiscussionsinprimarycare
AT baumanjaninem testingofatoolforprostatecancerscreeningdiscussionsinprimarycare
AT guptaniyati testingofatoolforprostatecancerscreeningdiscussionsinprimarycare
AT jixinge testingofatoolforprostatecancerscreeningdiscussionsinprimarycare
AT stephensonandrewj testingofatoolforprostatecancerscreeningdiscussionsinprimarycare
AT jonesjstephen testingofatoolforprostatecancerscreeningdiscussionsinprimarycare
AT kattanmichaelw testingofatoolforprostatecancerscreeningdiscussionsinprimarycare