Cargando…

Adverse Events During Perampanel Adjunctive Therapy in Intractable Epilepsy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Perampanel is the first α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA)-receptor antagonist developed to treat epilepsy. The effects of either rapid or slow dose titration on adverse events remain to be elucidated. METHODS: Eighty-five patients received perampane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Youn, Song Ee, Kim, Se Hee, Ko, Ara, Lee, Sun Ho, Lee, Young Mock, Kang, Hoon-Chul, Lee, Joon Soo, Kim, Heung Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neurological Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6031997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2018.14.3.296
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Perampanel is the first α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA)-receptor antagonist developed to treat epilepsy. The effects of either rapid or slow dose titration on adverse events remain to be elucidated. METHODS: Eighty-five patients received perampanel between March 2016 and August 2016. Patients were divided into two groups according to their dosing schedule: rapid dose titration (2-mg increments at intervals of 1 to 2 weeks) and slow dose titration (2-mg increments at intervals of at least 3 weeks). Seizure frequency and adverse events were analyzed over 3 months. RESULTS: Adverse events were reported by 47 (58%) of the 81 patients analyzed, with 12 (15%) patients discontinuing perampanel due to adverse events. Common adverse events included dizziness (n=30, 37%), aggressive mood and behavior (n=19, 24%), gait disturbance (n=16, 20%), and sleep problems (n=10, 12.4%). The overall adverse events were similar in the slow-titration group (38 of 61 patients) and the rapid-titration group (8 of 20 patients, p=0.081). However, none of the 20 patients in the slow-titration group experienced gait disturbance, compared with 16 of the 61 patients in the rapid-titration group (p=0.009), while appetite change was experienced by 4 patients in the slow-titration group but only 1 in the rapid-titration group (p=0.003). No relationship was noted between adverse events and the maximum dose of perampanel (p=0.116). Sex differences were observed, with the response to perampanel being better and the rate of adverse events being higher in females (p=0.015 and p=0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Slow titration of perampanel may reduce perampanel-related adverse events.