Cargando…

Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications

Morphologically complex flowers are characterized by bilateral symmetry, tube-like shapes, deep corolla tubes, fused petals, and/or poricidal anthers, all of which constrain the access of insect visitors to floral nectar and pollen rewards. Only a subset of potential pollinators, mainly large bees,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishna, Shivani, Keasar, Tamar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6032408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29882762
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061681
_version_ 1783337500472770560
author Krishna, Shivani
Keasar, Tamar
author_facet Krishna, Shivani
Keasar, Tamar
author_sort Krishna, Shivani
collection PubMed
description Morphologically complex flowers are characterized by bilateral symmetry, tube-like shapes, deep corolla tubes, fused petals, and/or poricidal anthers, all of which constrain the access of insect visitors to floral nectar and pollen rewards. Only a subset of potential pollinators, mainly large bees, learn to successfully forage on such flowers. Thus, complexity may comprise a morphological filter that restricts the range of visitors and thereby increases food intake for successful foragers. Such pollinator specialization, in turn, promotes flower constancy and reduces cross-species pollen transfer, providing fitness benefits to plants with complex flowers. Since visual signals associated with floral morphological complexity are generally honest (i.e., indicate food rewards), pollinators need to perceive and process them. Physiological studies show that bees detect distant flowers through long-wavelength sensitive photoreceptors. Bees effectively perceive complex shapes and learn the positions of contours based on their spatial frequencies. Complex flowers require long handling times by naive visitors, and become highly profitable only for experienced foragers. To explore possible pathways towards the evolution of floral complexity, we discuss cognitive mechanisms that potentially allow insects to persist on complex flowers despite low initial foraging gains, suggest experiments to test these mechanisms, and speculate on their adaptive value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6032408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60324082018-07-13 Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications Krishna, Shivani Keasar, Tamar Int J Mol Sci Review Morphologically complex flowers are characterized by bilateral symmetry, tube-like shapes, deep corolla tubes, fused petals, and/or poricidal anthers, all of which constrain the access of insect visitors to floral nectar and pollen rewards. Only a subset of potential pollinators, mainly large bees, learn to successfully forage on such flowers. Thus, complexity may comprise a morphological filter that restricts the range of visitors and thereby increases food intake for successful foragers. Such pollinator specialization, in turn, promotes flower constancy and reduces cross-species pollen transfer, providing fitness benefits to plants with complex flowers. Since visual signals associated with floral morphological complexity are generally honest (i.e., indicate food rewards), pollinators need to perceive and process them. Physiological studies show that bees detect distant flowers through long-wavelength sensitive photoreceptors. Bees effectively perceive complex shapes and learn the positions of contours based on their spatial frequencies. Complex flowers require long handling times by naive visitors, and become highly profitable only for experienced foragers. To explore possible pathways towards the evolution of floral complexity, we discuss cognitive mechanisms that potentially allow insects to persist on complex flowers despite low initial foraging gains, suggest experiments to test these mechanisms, and speculate on their adaptive value. MDPI 2018-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6032408/ /pubmed/29882762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061681 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Krishna, Shivani
Keasar, Tamar
Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications
title Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications
title_full Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications
title_fullStr Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications
title_full_unstemmed Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications
title_short Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications
title_sort morphological complexity as a floral signal: from perception by insect pollinators to co-evolutionary implications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6032408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29882762
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061681
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnashivani morphologicalcomplexityasafloralsignalfromperceptionbyinsectpollinatorstocoevolutionaryimplications
AT keasartamar morphologicalcomplexityasafloralsignalfromperceptionbyinsectpollinatorstocoevolutionaryimplications