Cargando…

Effect of alirocumab on lipids and lipoproteins in individuals with metabolic syndrome without diabetes: Pooled data from 10 phase 3 trials

AIMS: This analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, in patients with or without metabolic syndrome (MetS) using pooled data from 10 phase 3 ODYSSEY trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 4983 randomized patients (1940 with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henry, Robert R., Müller‐Wieland, Dirk, Taub, Pam R., Bujas‐Bobanovic, Maja, Louie, Michael J., Letierce, Alexia, Ginsberg, Henry N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29493859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13273
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: This analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, in patients with or without metabolic syndrome (MetS) using pooled data from 10 phase 3 ODYSSEY trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 4983 randomized patients (1940 with MetS; 1642 with diabetes excluded) were assessed in subgroups by MetS status. Efficacy data were analysed in 4 pools per study design: 2 placebo‐controlled pools (1 using alirocumab 150 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W], 1 using 75/150 mg Q2W) with background statin, and 2 ezetimibe‐controlled pools (both alirocumab 75/150 mg Q2W), 1 with and 1 without background statin. Alirocumab 75/150 mg indicates possible dose increase from 75 to 150 mg at Week 12 based on Week 8 LDL‐C. RESULTS: LDL‐C percentage reduction from baseline at Week 24 with alirocumab was 63.9% (MetS) and 56.8% (non‐MetS) in the pool of alirocumab 150 mg Q2W, and 42.2% to 52.2% (MetS) and 45.0% to 52.6% (non‐MetS) in 3 pools using 75/150 mg Q2W. Levels of other lipid and lipoprotein parameters were also improved with alirocumab treatment, including apolipoprotein B, non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (non‐HDL‐C), lipoprotein(a) and HDL‐C. Overall, the percentage change at Week 24 in LDL‐C and other lipids and lipoproteins did not vary by MetS status. Adverse event rates were generally similar between treatment groups, regardless of MetS status; injection‐site reactions occurred more frequently in alirocumab vs control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Across study pools, alirocumab‐associated reductions in LDL‐C, apolipoprotein B, and non‐HDL‐C were significant vs control, and did not vary by MetS status.