Cargando…

A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study

AIMS: To inform the transferability of tobacco control‐related economic evidence to resource‐poor countries. METHODS: We ran a univariate sensitivity analysis on a return on investment (ROI) model, the European study on Quantifying Utility of Investment in Protection from Tobacco model (EQUIPTMOD),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Németh, Bertalan, Kulchaitanaroaj, Puttarin, Lester‐George, Adam, Huic, Mirjana, Coyle, Kathryn, Coyle, Doug, Pokhrel, Subhash, Kaló, Zoltán
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29377316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14092
_version_ 1783337644793528320
author Németh, Bertalan
Kulchaitanaroaj, Puttarin
Lester‐George, Adam
Huic, Mirjana
Coyle, Kathryn
Coyle, Doug
Pokhrel, Subhash
Kaló, Zoltán
author_facet Németh, Bertalan
Kulchaitanaroaj, Puttarin
Lester‐George, Adam
Huic, Mirjana
Coyle, Kathryn
Coyle, Doug
Pokhrel, Subhash
Kaló, Zoltán
author_sort Németh, Bertalan
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To inform the transferability of tobacco control‐related economic evidence to resource‐poor countries. METHODS: We ran a univariate sensitivity analysis on a return on investment (ROI) model, the European study on Quantifying Utility of Investment in Protection from Tobacco model (EQUIPTMOD), to identify key input values to which the ROI estimates were sensitive. The EQUIPTMOD used a Markov‐based state transition model to estimate the ROI of several tobacco control interventions in five European countries (England, Germany, Spain, Hungary and the Netherlands). Base case ROI estimates were obtained through average values of model inputs (throughout the five countries), which were then replaced one at a time with country‐specific values. Tornado diagrams were used to evaluate the significance of sensitivity, defined as a ≥ 10% difference in ROI estimates from the base case estimates. RESULTS: The ROI estimates were sensitive to 18 (of 46) input values. Examples of model inputs to which ROI estimates were sensitive included: smoking rate, costs of smoking‐related diseases (e.g. lung cancer) and general population attributes. CONCLUSION: Countries that have limited research time and other resources can adapt EQUIPTMOD to their own settings by choosing to collect data on a small number of model inputs. EQUIPTMOD can therefore facilitate transfer of tobacco control related economic evidence to new jurisdictions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6033140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60331402018-07-12 A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study Németh, Bertalan Kulchaitanaroaj, Puttarin Lester‐George, Adam Huic, Mirjana Coyle, Kathryn Coyle, Doug Pokhrel, Subhash Kaló, Zoltán Addiction EQUIPTMOD as a Basis for Rational Investment Decisions in Tobacco Control AIMS: To inform the transferability of tobacco control‐related economic evidence to resource‐poor countries. METHODS: We ran a univariate sensitivity analysis on a return on investment (ROI) model, the European study on Quantifying Utility of Investment in Protection from Tobacco model (EQUIPTMOD), to identify key input values to which the ROI estimates were sensitive. The EQUIPTMOD used a Markov‐based state transition model to estimate the ROI of several tobacco control interventions in five European countries (England, Germany, Spain, Hungary and the Netherlands). Base case ROI estimates were obtained through average values of model inputs (throughout the five countries), which were then replaced one at a time with country‐specific values. Tornado diagrams were used to evaluate the significance of sensitivity, defined as a ≥ 10% difference in ROI estimates from the base case estimates. RESULTS: The ROI estimates were sensitive to 18 (of 46) input values. Examples of model inputs to which ROI estimates were sensitive included: smoking rate, costs of smoking‐related diseases (e.g. lung cancer) and general population attributes. CONCLUSION: Countries that have limited research time and other resources can adapt EQUIPTMOD to their own settings by choosing to collect data on a small number of model inputs. EQUIPTMOD can therefore facilitate transfer of tobacco control related economic evidence to new jurisdictions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-28 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6033140/ /pubmed/29377316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14092 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle EQUIPTMOD as a Basis for Rational Investment Decisions in Tobacco Control
Németh, Bertalan
Kulchaitanaroaj, Puttarin
Lester‐George, Adam
Huic, Mirjana
Coyle, Kathryn
Coyle, Doug
Pokhrel, Subhash
Kaló, Zoltán
A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study
title A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study
title_full A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study
title_fullStr A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study
title_full_unstemmed A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study
title_short A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study
title_sort utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the equipt study
topic EQUIPTMOD as a Basis for Rational Investment Decisions in Tobacco Control
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29377316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14092
work_keys_str_mv AT nemethbertalan autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT kulchaitanaroajputtarin autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT lestergeorgeadam autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT huicmirjana autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT coylekathryn autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT coyledoug autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT pokhrelsubhash autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT kalozoltan autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT nemethbertalan utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT kulchaitanaroajputtarin utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT lestergeorgeadam utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT huicmirjana utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT coylekathryn utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT coyledoug utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT pokhrelsubhash utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy
AT kalozoltan utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy