Cargando…
A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study
AIMS: To inform the transferability of tobacco control‐related economic evidence to resource‐poor countries. METHODS: We ran a univariate sensitivity analysis on a return on investment (ROI) model, the European study on Quantifying Utility of Investment in Protection from Tobacco model (EQUIPTMOD),...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29377316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14092 |
_version_ | 1783337644793528320 |
---|---|
author | Németh, Bertalan Kulchaitanaroaj, Puttarin Lester‐George, Adam Huic, Mirjana Coyle, Kathryn Coyle, Doug Pokhrel, Subhash Kaló, Zoltán |
author_facet | Németh, Bertalan Kulchaitanaroaj, Puttarin Lester‐George, Adam Huic, Mirjana Coyle, Kathryn Coyle, Doug Pokhrel, Subhash Kaló, Zoltán |
author_sort | Németh, Bertalan |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To inform the transferability of tobacco control‐related economic evidence to resource‐poor countries. METHODS: We ran a univariate sensitivity analysis on a return on investment (ROI) model, the European study on Quantifying Utility of Investment in Protection from Tobacco model (EQUIPTMOD), to identify key input values to which the ROI estimates were sensitive. The EQUIPTMOD used a Markov‐based state transition model to estimate the ROI of several tobacco control interventions in five European countries (England, Germany, Spain, Hungary and the Netherlands). Base case ROI estimates were obtained through average values of model inputs (throughout the five countries), which were then replaced one at a time with country‐specific values. Tornado diagrams were used to evaluate the significance of sensitivity, defined as a ≥ 10% difference in ROI estimates from the base case estimates. RESULTS: The ROI estimates were sensitive to 18 (of 46) input values. Examples of model inputs to which ROI estimates were sensitive included: smoking rate, costs of smoking‐related diseases (e.g. lung cancer) and general population attributes. CONCLUSION: Countries that have limited research time and other resources can adapt EQUIPTMOD to their own settings by choosing to collect data on a small number of model inputs. EQUIPTMOD can therefore facilitate transfer of tobacco control related economic evidence to new jurisdictions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6033140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60331402018-07-12 A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study Németh, Bertalan Kulchaitanaroaj, Puttarin Lester‐George, Adam Huic, Mirjana Coyle, Kathryn Coyle, Doug Pokhrel, Subhash Kaló, Zoltán Addiction EQUIPTMOD as a Basis for Rational Investment Decisions in Tobacco Control AIMS: To inform the transferability of tobacco control‐related economic evidence to resource‐poor countries. METHODS: We ran a univariate sensitivity analysis on a return on investment (ROI) model, the European study on Quantifying Utility of Investment in Protection from Tobacco model (EQUIPTMOD), to identify key input values to which the ROI estimates were sensitive. The EQUIPTMOD used a Markov‐based state transition model to estimate the ROI of several tobacco control interventions in five European countries (England, Germany, Spain, Hungary and the Netherlands). Base case ROI estimates were obtained through average values of model inputs (throughout the five countries), which were then replaced one at a time with country‐specific values. Tornado diagrams were used to evaluate the significance of sensitivity, defined as a ≥ 10% difference in ROI estimates from the base case estimates. RESULTS: The ROI estimates were sensitive to 18 (of 46) input values. Examples of model inputs to which ROI estimates were sensitive included: smoking rate, costs of smoking‐related diseases (e.g. lung cancer) and general population attributes. CONCLUSION: Countries that have limited research time and other resources can adapt EQUIPTMOD to their own settings by choosing to collect data on a small number of model inputs. EQUIPTMOD can therefore facilitate transfer of tobacco control related economic evidence to new jurisdictions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-28 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6033140/ /pubmed/29377316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14092 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | EQUIPTMOD as a Basis for Rational Investment Decisions in Tobacco Control Németh, Bertalan Kulchaitanaroaj, Puttarin Lester‐George, Adam Huic, Mirjana Coyle, Kathryn Coyle, Doug Pokhrel, Subhash Kaló, Zoltán A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study |
title | A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study |
title_full | A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study |
title_fullStr | A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study |
title_full_unstemmed | A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study |
title_short | A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study |
title_sort | utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control‐related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the equipt study |
topic | EQUIPTMOD as a Basis for Rational Investment Decisions in Tobacco Control |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29377316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nemethbertalan autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT kulchaitanaroajputtarin autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT lestergeorgeadam autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT huicmirjana autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT coylekathryn autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT coyledoug autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT pokhrelsubhash autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT kalozoltan autilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT nemethbertalan utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT kulchaitanaroajputtarin utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT lestergeorgeadam utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT huicmirjana utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT coylekathryn utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT coyledoug utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT pokhrelsubhash utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy AT kalozoltan utilityofmodelinputuncertaintyanalysisintransferringtobaccocontrolrelatedeconomicevidencetocountrieswithscarceresourcesresultsfromtheequiptstudy |