Cargando…
Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
BACKGROUND: Studies comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer may report only patients who underwent resection and so survival will be skewed. The aim of this study was to report survival by intention to treat in a comparison of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant trea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10870 |
_version_ | 1783337648907091968 |
---|---|
author | Versteijne, E. Vogel, J. A. Besselink, M. G. Busch, O. R. C. Wilmink, J. W. Daams, J. G. van Eijck, C. H. J. Groot Koerkamp, B. Rasch, C. R. N. van Tienhoven, G. |
author_facet | Versteijne, E. Vogel, J. A. Besselink, M. G. Busch, O. R. C. Wilmink, J. W. Daams, J. G. van Eijck, C. H. J. Groot Koerkamp, B. Rasch, C. R. N. van Tienhoven, G. |
author_sort | Versteijne, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer may report only patients who underwent resection and so survival will be skewed. The aim of this study was to report survival by intention to treat in a comparison of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting median overall survival by intention to treat in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with or without neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary outcomes included overall and R0 resection rate, pathological lymph node rate, reasons for unresectability and toxicity of neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: In total, 38 studies were included with 3484 patients, of whom 1738 (49·9 per cent) had neoadjuvant treatment. The weighted median overall survival by intention to treat was 18·8 months for neoadjuvant treatment and 14·8 months for upfront surgery; the difference was larger among patients whose tumours were resected (26·1 versus 15·0 months respectively). The overall resection rate was lower with neoadjuvant treatment than with upfront surgery (66·0 versus 81·3 per cent; P < 0·001), but the R0 rate was higher (86·8 (95 per cent c.i. 84·6 to 88·7) versus 66·9 (64·2 to 69·6) per cent; P < 0·001). Reported by intention to treat, the R0 rates were 58·0 and 54·9 per cent respectively (P = 0·088). The pathological lymph node rate was 43·8 per cent after neoadjuvant therapy and 64·8 per cent in the upfront surgery group (P < 0·001). Toxicity of at least grade III was reported in up to 64 per cent of the patients. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant treatment appears to improve overall survival by intention to treat, despite lower overall resection rates for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016049374. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6033157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60331572018-07-12 Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer Versteijne, E. Vogel, J. A. Besselink, M. G. Busch, O. R. C. Wilmink, J. W. Daams, J. G. van Eijck, C. H. J. Groot Koerkamp, B. Rasch, C. R. N. van Tienhoven, G. Br J Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Studies comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer may report only patients who underwent resection and so survival will be skewed. The aim of this study was to report survival by intention to treat in a comparison of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting median overall survival by intention to treat in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with or without neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary outcomes included overall and R0 resection rate, pathological lymph node rate, reasons for unresectability and toxicity of neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: In total, 38 studies were included with 3484 patients, of whom 1738 (49·9 per cent) had neoadjuvant treatment. The weighted median overall survival by intention to treat was 18·8 months for neoadjuvant treatment and 14·8 months for upfront surgery; the difference was larger among patients whose tumours were resected (26·1 versus 15·0 months respectively). The overall resection rate was lower with neoadjuvant treatment than with upfront surgery (66·0 versus 81·3 per cent; P < 0·001), but the R0 rate was higher (86·8 (95 per cent c.i. 84·6 to 88·7) versus 66·9 (64·2 to 69·6) per cent; P < 0·001). Reported by intention to treat, the R0 rates were 58·0 and 54·9 per cent respectively (P = 0·088). The pathological lymph node rate was 43·8 per cent after neoadjuvant therapy and 64·8 per cent in the upfront surgery group (P < 0·001). Toxicity of at least grade III was reported in up to 64 per cent of the patients. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant treatment appears to improve overall survival by intention to treat, despite lower overall resection rates for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016049374. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018-04-30 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6033157/ /pubmed/29708592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10870 Text en © 2018 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Versteijne, E. Vogel, J. A. Besselink, M. G. Busch, O. R. C. Wilmink, J. W. Daams, J. G. van Eijck, C. H. J. Groot Koerkamp, B. Rasch, C. R. N. van Tienhoven, G. Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer |
title | Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer |
title_full | Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer |
title_fullStr | Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer |
title_short | Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer |
title_sort | meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10870 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT versteijnee metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT vogelja metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT besselinkmg metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT buschorc metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT wilminkjw metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT daamsjg metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT vaneijckchj metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT grootkoerkampb metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT raschcrn metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT vantienhoveng metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer |