Cargando…

Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer may report only patients who underwent resection and so survival will be skewed. The aim of this study was to report survival by intention to treat in a comparison of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Versteijne, E., Vogel, J. A., Besselink, M. G., Busch, O. R. C., Wilmink, J. W., Daams, J. G., van Eijck, C. H. J., Groot Koerkamp, B., Rasch, C. R. N., van Tienhoven, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10870
_version_ 1783337648907091968
author Versteijne, E.
Vogel, J. A.
Besselink, M. G.
Busch, O. R. C.
Wilmink, J. W.
Daams, J. G.
van Eijck, C. H. J.
Groot Koerkamp, B.
Rasch, C. R. N.
van Tienhoven, G.
author_facet Versteijne, E.
Vogel, J. A.
Besselink, M. G.
Busch, O. R. C.
Wilmink, J. W.
Daams, J. G.
van Eijck, C. H. J.
Groot Koerkamp, B.
Rasch, C. R. N.
van Tienhoven, G.
author_sort Versteijne, E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer may report only patients who underwent resection and so survival will be skewed. The aim of this study was to report survival by intention to treat in a comparison of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting median overall survival by intention to treat in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with or without neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary outcomes included overall and R0 resection rate, pathological lymph node rate, reasons for unresectability and toxicity of neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: In total, 38 studies were included with 3484 patients, of whom 1738 (49·9 per cent) had neoadjuvant treatment. The weighted median overall survival by intention to treat was 18·8 months for neoadjuvant treatment and 14·8 months for upfront surgery; the difference was larger among patients whose tumours were resected (26·1 versus 15·0 months respectively). The overall resection rate was lower with neoadjuvant treatment than with upfront surgery (66·0 versus 81·3 per cent; P < 0·001), but the R0 rate was higher (86·8 (95 per cent c.i. 84·6 to 88·7) versus 66·9 (64·2 to 69·6) per cent; P < 0·001). Reported by intention to treat, the R0 rates were 58·0 and 54·9 per cent respectively (P = 0·088). The pathological lymph node rate was 43·8 per cent after neoadjuvant therapy and 64·8 per cent in the upfront surgery group (P < 0·001). Toxicity of at least grade III was reported in up to 64 per cent of the patients. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant treatment appears to improve overall survival by intention to treat, despite lower overall resection rates for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016049374.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6033157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60331572018-07-12 Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer Versteijne, E. Vogel, J. A. Besselink, M. G. Busch, O. R. C. Wilmink, J. W. Daams, J. G. van Eijck, C. H. J. Groot Koerkamp, B. Rasch, C. R. N. van Tienhoven, G. Br J Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Studies comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer may report only patients who underwent resection and so survival will be skewed. The aim of this study was to report survival by intention to treat in a comparison of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting median overall survival by intention to treat in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with or without neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary outcomes included overall and R0 resection rate, pathological lymph node rate, reasons for unresectability and toxicity of neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: In total, 38 studies were included with 3484 patients, of whom 1738 (49·9 per cent) had neoadjuvant treatment. The weighted median overall survival by intention to treat was 18·8 months for neoadjuvant treatment and 14·8 months for upfront surgery; the difference was larger among patients whose tumours were resected (26·1 versus 15·0 months respectively). The overall resection rate was lower with neoadjuvant treatment than with upfront surgery (66·0 versus 81·3 per cent; P < 0·001), but the R0 rate was higher (86·8 (95 per cent c.i. 84·6 to 88·7) versus 66·9 (64·2 to 69·6) per cent; P < 0·001). Reported by intention to treat, the R0 rates were 58·0 and 54·9 per cent respectively (P = 0·088). The pathological lymph node rate was 43·8 per cent after neoadjuvant therapy and 64·8 per cent in the upfront surgery group (P < 0·001). Toxicity of at least grade III was reported in up to 64 per cent of the patients. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant treatment appears to improve overall survival by intention to treat, despite lower overall resection rates for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016049374. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018-04-30 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6033157/ /pubmed/29708592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10870 Text en © 2018 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Versteijne, E.
Vogel, J. A.
Besselink, M. G.
Busch, O. R. C.
Wilmink, J. W.
Daams, J. G.
van Eijck, C. H. J.
Groot Koerkamp, B.
Rasch, C. R. N.
van Tienhoven, G.
Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
title Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
title_full Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
title_fullStr Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
title_short Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
title_sort meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10870
work_keys_str_mv AT versteijnee metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer
AT vogelja metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer
AT besselinkmg metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer
AT buschorc metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer
AT wilminkjw metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer
AT daamsjg metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer
AT vaneijckchj metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer
AT grootkoerkampb metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer
AT raschcrn metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer
AT vantienhoveng metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer
AT metaanalysiscomparingupfrontsurgerywithneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithresectableorborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer