Cargando…

A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty

BACKGROUND: This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma. METHODS: This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Ying-Chieh, Kuo, Chin-Lung, Huang, Tzu-Chin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4
_version_ 1783337660014657536
author Hsu, Ying-Chieh
Kuo, Chin-Lung
Huang, Tzu-Chin
author_facet Hsu, Ying-Chieh
Kuo, Chin-Lung
Huang, Tzu-Chin
author_sort Hsu, Ying-Chieh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma. METHODS: This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of cholesteatoma at our hospital between January 2008 and October 2015. The adoption of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) or microscopic ear surgery (MES) was divided temporally (before and since 2014). Comparisons between these groups focused on the following: (I) surgical outcomes, including successful tympanic membrane healing and post-operative complications; (II) restoration of hearing; and (III) consumption of medical resources, including the duration of surgery and anesthesia. All patients had a follow-up period of at least 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical outcome or hearing restoration. TEES resulted in the successful healing of 96.2% of ear drums, whereas MES led to successful healing in 92% (p = 0.2826) of cases. The average hearing gains following surgery were 10.27 ± 6.4 and 12.43 ± 7.46 dB in TEES and MES, respectively. The consumption of medical resources in the TEES group was lower than that of the MES group (TEES versus MES) regarding the average operating time (87.8 ± 19.01 min (mins) versus 110.2 ± 17.0 (mins) (p <  0.0001)) and the mean duration of anesthesia ((for general anesthesia patients) (122.1 ± 21.25 mins versus 145.8 ± 16.88 mins) (p ≤  0.0001)). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that TEES can achieve surgical outcomes and hearing restoration comparable to those of MES. In addition, TEES appears to be associated with shorter surgical and anesthesia time, which makes it an ideal alternative for the management of COM without cholesteatoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathay General Hospital. (CGHIRB No: CGH-P105012).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6033204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60332042018-07-12 A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty Hsu, Ying-Chieh Kuo, Chin-Lung Huang, Tzu-Chin J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma. METHODS: This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of cholesteatoma at our hospital between January 2008 and October 2015. The adoption of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) or microscopic ear surgery (MES) was divided temporally (before and since 2014). Comparisons between these groups focused on the following: (I) surgical outcomes, including successful tympanic membrane healing and post-operative complications; (II) restoration of hearing; and (III) consumption of medical resources, including the duration of surgery and anesthesia. All patients had a follow-up period of at least 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical outcome or hearing restoration. TEES resulted in the successful healing of 96.2% of ear drums, whereas MES led to successful healing in 92% (p = 0.2826) of cases. The average hearing gains following surgery were 10.27 ± 6.4 and 12.43 ± 7.46 dB in TEES and MES, respectively. The consumption of medical resources in the TEES group was lower than that of the MES group (TEES versus MES) regarding the average operating time (87.8 ± 19.01 min (mins) versus 110.2 ± 17.0 (mins) (p <  0.0001)) and the mean duration of anesthesia ((for general anesthesia patients) (122.1 ± 21.25 mins versus 145.8 ± 16.88 mins) (p ≤  0.0001)). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that TEES can achieve surgical outcomes and hearing restoration comparable to those of MES. In addition, TEES appears to be associated with shorter surgical and anesthesia time, which makes it an ideal alternative for the management of COM without cholesteatoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathay General Hospital. (CGHIRB No: CGH-P105012). BioMed Central 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6033204/ /pubmed/29973286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Hsu, Ying-Chieh
Kuo, Chin-Lung
Huang, Tzu-Chin
A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title_full A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title_fullStr A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title_short A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title_sort retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hsuyingchieh aretrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty
AT kuochinlung aretrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty
AT huangtzuchin aretrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty
AT hsuyingchieh retrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty
AT kuochinlung retrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty
AT huangtzuchin retrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty