Cargando…
A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
BACKGROUND: This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma. METHODS: This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of ch...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4 |
_version_ | 1783337660014657536 |
---|---|
author | Hsu, Ying-Chieh Kuo, Chin-Lung Huang, Tzu-Chin |
author_facet | Hsu, Ying-Chieh Kuo, Chin-Lung Huang, Tzu-Chin |
author_sort | Hsu, Ying-Chieh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma. METHODS: This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of cholesteatoma at our hospital between January 2008 and October 2015. The adoption of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) or microscopic ear surgery (MES) was divided temporally (before and since 2014). Comparisons between these groups focused on the following: (I) surgical outcomes, including successful tympanic membrane healing and post-operative complications; (II) restoration of hearing; and (III) consumption of medical resources, including the duration of surgery and anesthesia. All patients had a follow-up period of at least 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical outcome or hearing restoration. TEES resulted in the successful healing of 96.2% of ear drums, whereas MES led to successful healing in 92% (p = 0.2826) of cases. The average hearing gains following surgery were 10.27 ± 6.4 and 12.43 ± 7.46 dB in TEES and MES, respectively. The consumption of medical resources in the TEES group was lower than that of the MES group (TEES versus MES) regarding the average operating time (87.8 ± 19.01 min (mins) versus 110.2 ± 17.0 (mins) (p < 0.0001)) and the mean duration of anesthesia ((for general anesthesia patients) (122.1 ± 21.25 mins versus 145.8 ± 16.88 mins) (p ≤ 0.0001)). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that TEES can achieve surgical outcomes and hearing restoration comparable to those of MES. In addition, TEES appears to be associated with shorter surgical and anesthesia time, which makes it an ideal alternative for the management of COM without cholesteatoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathay General Hospital. (CGHIRB No: CGH-P105012). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6033204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60332042018-07-12 A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty Hsu, Ying-Chieh Kuo, Chin-Lung Huang, Tzu-Chin J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma. METHODS: This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of cholesteatoma at our hospital between January 2008 and October 2015. The adoption of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) or microscopic ear surgery (MES) was divided temporally (before and since 2014). Comparisons between these groups focused on the following: (I) surgical outcomes, including successful tympanic membrane healing and post-operative complications; (II) restoration of hearing; and (III) consumption of medical resources, including the duration of surgery and anesthesia. All patients had a follow-up period of at least 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical outcome or hearing restoration. TEES resulted in the successful healing of 96.2% of ear drums, whereas MES led to successful healing in 92% (p = 0.2826) of cases. The average hearing gains following surgery were 10.27 ± 6.4 and 12.43 ± 7.46 dB in TEES and MES, respectively. The consumption of medical resources in the TEES group was lower than that of the MES group (TEES versus MES) regarding the average operating time (87.8 ± 19.01 min (mins) versus 110.2 ± 17.0 (mins) (p < 0.0001)) and the mean duration of anesthesia ((for general anesthesia patients) (122.1 ± 21.25 mins versus 145.8 ± 16.88 mins) (p ≤ 0.0001)). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that TEES can achieve surgical outcomes and hearing restoration comparable to those of MES. In addition, TEES appears to be associated with shorter surgical and anesthesia time, which makes it an ideal alternative for the management of COM without cholesteatoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathay General Hospital. (CGHIRB No: CGH-P105012). BioMed Central 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6033204/ /pubmed/29973286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Hsu, Ying-Chieh Kuo, Chin-Lung Huang, Tzu-Chin A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty |
title | A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty |
title_full | A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty |
title_fullStr | A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty |
title_short | A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty |
title_sort | retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hsuyingchieh aretrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty AT kuochinlung aretrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty AT huangtzuchin aretrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty AT hsuyingchieh retrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty AT kuochinlung retrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty AT huangtzuchin retrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty |