Cargando…
Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Actively referring smokers to smoking cessation (SC) services could increase quitting and is scalable for the population. The objective of this study is to compare 2 different intensities of SC active referral for smokers in the community of Hong Kong. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-bl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5782-1 |
_version_ | 1783337660507488256 |
---|---|
author | Weng, Xue Wang, Man Ping Suen, Yi Nam Li, William Ho Cheung Wu, Yongda Cheung, Derek Yee Tak Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing Lai, Vienna Wai Yin Chan, Sophia Siu Chee Lam, Tai Hing |
author_facet | Weng, Xue Wang, Man Ping Suen, Yi Nam Li, William Ho Cheung Wu, Yongda Cheung, Derek Yee Tak Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing Lai, Vienna Wai Yin Chan, Sophia Siu Chee Lam, Tai Hing |
author_sort | Weng, Xue |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Actively referring smokers to smoking cessation (SC) services could increase quitting and is scalable for the population. The objective of this study is to compare 2 different intensities of SC active referral for smokers in the community of Hong Kong. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-blind, parallel 3-armed cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) consisting of high-intensity SC active referral (HAR Group), low-intensity SC referral by text messaging on promoting SC services use (Text Group) and a control group receives general very brief advice. Biochemically validated daily smokers will be proactively recruited in the community from 68 clusters (recruitment sessions). The primary outcome is self-reported 7-days point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at the 3- and 6- month follow-ups. Secondary outcomes are SC service use, smoking reduction rate (SRR, daily cigarette consumption reduced by ≥50%; excluding quitters) and biochemically validated quit rate (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml). Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation. Intention-to-treat principle and Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) regressions will be used for data analysis. DISCUSSION: This will be the first trial on evaluating the efficacy of the 2 different intensities of SC active referral on smoking cessation in community smokers. It is anticipated that the results from this trial can provide evidence to the effectiveness of high-intensity active referral to SC services and low intensity SC referral by using text messaging in achieving smoking abstinence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02804880, June 17, 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6033206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60332062018-07-12 Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial Weng, Xue Wang, Man Ping Suen, Yi Nam Li, William Ho Cheung Wu, Yongda Cheung, Derek Yee Tak Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing Lai, Vienna Wai Yin Chan, Sophia Siu Chee Lam, Tai Hing BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Actively referring smokers to smoking cessation (SC) services could increase quitting and is scalable for the population. The objective of this study is to compare 2 different intensities of SC active referral for smokers in the community of Hong Kong. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-blind, parallel 3-armed cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) consisting of high-intensity SC active referral (HAR Group), low-intensity SC referral by text messaging on promoting SC services use (Text Group) and a control group receives general very brief advice. Biochemically validated daily smokers will be proactively recruited in the community from 68 clusters (recruitment sessions). The primary outcome is self-reported 7-days point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at the 3- and 6- month follow-ups. Secondary outcomes are SC service use, smoking reduction rate (SRR, daily cigarette consumption reduced by ≥50%; excluding quitters) and biochemically validated quit rate (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml). Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation. Intention-to-treat principle and Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) regressions will be used for data analysis. DISCUSSION: This will be the first trial on evaluating the efficacy of the 2 different intensities of SC active referral on smoking cessation in community smokers. It is anticipated that the results from this trial can provide evidence to the effectiveness of high-intensity active referral to SC services and low intensity SC referral by using text messaging in achieving smoking abstinence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02804880, June 17, 2016. BioMed Central 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6033206/ /pubmed/29973191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5782-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Weng, Xue Wang, Man Ping Suen, Yi Nam Li, William Ho Cheung Wu, Yongda Cheung, Derek Yee Tak Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing Lai, Vienna Wai Yin Chan, Sophia Siu Chee Lam, Tai Hing Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5782-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wengxue comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangmanping comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT suenyinam comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liwilliamhocheung comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wuyongda comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cheungderekyeetak comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kwongantoniochoshing comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT laiviennawaiyin comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chansophiasiuchee comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lamtaihing comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |