Cargando…

Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Actively referring smokers to smoking cessation (SC) services could increase quitting and is scalable for the population. The objective of this study is to compare 2 different intensities of SC active referral for smokers in the community of Hong Kong. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-bl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weng, Xue, Wang, Man Ping, Suen, Yi Nam, Li, William Ho Cheung, Wu, Yongda, Cheung, Derek Yee Tak, Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing, Lai, Vienna Wai Yin, Chan, Sophia Siu Chee, Lam, Tai Hing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5782-1
_version_ 1783337660507488256
author Weng, Xue
Wang, Man Ping
Suen, Yi Nam
Li, William Ho Cheung
Wu, Yongda
Cheung, Derek Yee Tak
Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing
Lai, Vienna Wai Yin
Chan, Sophia Siu Chee
Lam, Tai Hing
author_facet Weng, Xue
Wang, Man Ping
Suen, Yi Nam
Li, William Ho Cheung
Wu, Yongda
Cheung, Derek Yee Tak
Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing
Lai, Vienna Wai Yin
Chan, Sophia Siu Chee
Lam, Tai Hing
author_sort Weng, Xue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Actively referring smokers to smoking cessation (SC) services could increase quitting and is scalable for the population. The objective of this study is to compare 2 different intensities of SC active referral for smokers in the community of Hong Kong. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-blind, parallel 3-armed cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) consisting of high-intensity SC active referral (HAR Group), low-intensity SC referral by text messaging on promoting SC services use (Text Group) and a control group receives general very brief advice. Biochemically validated daily smokers will be proactively recruited in the community from 68 clusters (recruitment sessions). The primary outcome is self-reported 7-days point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at the 3- and 6- month follow-ups. Secondary outcomes are SC service use, smoking reduction rate (SRR, daily cigarette consumption reduced by ≥50%; excluding quitters) and biochemically validated quit rate (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml). Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation. Intention-to-treat principle and Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) regressions will be used for data analysis. DISCUSSION: This will be the first trial on evaluating the efficacy of the 2 different intensities of SC active referral on smoking cessation in community smokers. It is anticipated that the results from this trial can provide evidence to the effectiveness of high-intensity active referral to SC services and low intensity SC referral by using text messaging in achieving smoking abstinence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02804880, June 17, 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6033206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60332062018-07-12 Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial Weng, Xue Wang, Man Ping Suen, Yi Nam Li, William Ho Cheung Wu, Yongda Cheung, Derek Yee Tak Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing Lai, Vienna Wai Yin Chan, Sophia Siu Chee Lam, Tai Hing BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Actively referring smokers to smoking cessation (SC) services could increase quitting and is scalable for the population. The objective of this study is to compare 2 different intensities of SC active referral for smokers in the community of Hong Kong. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-blind, parallel 3-armed cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) consisting of high-intensity SC active referral (HAR Group), low-intensity SC referral by text messaging on promoting SC services use (Text Group) and a control group receives general very brief advice. Biochemically validated daily smokers will be proactively recruited in the community from 68 clusters (recruitment sessions). The primary outcome is self-reported 7-days point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at the 3- and 6- month follow-ups. Secondary outcomes are SC service use, smoking reduction rate (SRR, daily cigarette consumption reduced by ≥50%; excluding quitters) and biochemically validated quit rate (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml). Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation. Intention-to-treat principle and Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) regressions will be used for data analysis. DISCUSSION: This will be the first trial on evaluating the efficacy of the 2 different intensities of SC active referral on smoking cessation in community smokers. It is anticipated that the results from this trial can provide evidence to the effectiveness of high-intensity active referral to SC services and low intensity SC referral by using text messaging in achieving smoking abstinence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02804880, June 17, 2016. BioMed Central 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6033206/ /pubmed/29973191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5782-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Weng, Xue
Wang, Man Ping
Suen, Yi Nam
Li, William Ho Cheung
Wu, Yongda
Cheung, Derek Yee Tak
Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing
Lai, Vienna Wai Yin
Chan, Sophia Siu Chee
Lam, Tai Hing
Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
title Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparing different intensities of active referral to smoking cessation services in promoting smoking cessation among community smokers: a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5782-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wengxue comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangmanping comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suenyinam comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liwilliamhocheung comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuyongda comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cheungderekyeetak comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kwongantoniochoshing comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT laiviennawaiyin comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chansophiasiuchee comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lamtaihing comparingdifferentintensitiesofactivereferraltosmokingcessationservicesinpromotingsmokingcessationamongcommunitysmokersastudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial