Cargando…

Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers (LCP) undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of this prospective, single-center, observational study was to evaluate artefacts on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images in patients with LCP. METHODS: Fift...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiblboeck, Daniel, Reiter, Christian, Kammler, Juergen, Schmit, Pierre, Blessberger, Hermann, Kellermair, Joerg, Fellner, Franz, Steinwender, Clemens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0469-4
_version_ 1783337665228177408
author Kiblboeck, Daniel
Reiter, Christian
Kammler, Juergen
Schmit, Pierre
Blessberger, Hermann
Kellermair, Joerg
Fellner, Franz
Steinwender, Clemens
author_facet Kiblboeck, Daniel
Reiter, Christian
Kammler, Juergen
Schmit, Pierre
Blessberger, Hermann
Kellermair, Joerg
Fellner, Franz
Steinwender, Clemens
author_sort Kiblboeck, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are limited data on patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers (LCP) undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of this prospective, single-center, observational study was to evaluate artefacts on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images in patients with LCP. METHODS: Fifteen patients with Micra™ LCP, implanted at least 6 weeks prior to CMR scan, were enrolled and underwent either 1.5 Tesla or 3 Tesla CMR imaging. Artefacts were categorized into grade 1 (excellent image quality), grade 2 (good), grade 3 (poor) and grade 4 (non-diagnostic) for each myocardial segment. One patient was excluded because of an incomplete CMR investigation due to claustrophobia. RESULTS: LCP caused an arc-shaped artefact (0.99 ± 0.16 cm(2)) at the right ventricular (RV) apex. Of 224 analyzed myocardial segments of the left ventricle (LV) 158 (70.5%) were affected by grade 1, 27 (12.1%) by grade 2, 17 (7.6%) by grade 3 and 22 (9.8%) by grade 4 artefacts. The artefact burden of grade 3 and 4 artefacts was significantly higher in the 3 Tesla group (3 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla: 3.7 ± 1.6 vs 1.9 ± 1.4 myocardial segments per patient, p = 0.03). A high artefact burden was particularly observed in the mid anteroseptal, inferoseptal and apical septal myocardial segments of the LV and in the mid and apical segments of the RV. Quantification of LV function and assessment of valves were feasible in all patients. We did not observe any clinical or device-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: CMR imaging in patients with LCP is feasible with excellent to good image quality in the majority of LV segments. The artefact burden is comparable small allowing an accurate evaluation of LV function, cardiac structures and valves. However, artefacts in the mid anteroseptal, inferoseptal and apical septal myocardial segments of the LV due to the LCP may impair or even exclude diagnostic evaluation of these segments. Artefacts on CMR images may be reduced by the use of 1.5 Tesla CMR scanners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6033226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60332262018-07-12 Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers Kiblboeck, Daniel Reiter, Christian Kammler, Juergen Schmit, Pierre Blessberger, Hermann Kellermair, Joerg Fellner, Franz Steinwender, Clemens J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: There are limited data on patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers (LCP) undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of this prospective, single-center, observational study was to evaluate artefacts on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images in patients with LCP. METHODS: Fifteen patients with Micra™ LCP, implanted at least 6 weeks prior to CMR scan, were enrolled and underwent either 1.5 Tesla or 3 Tesla CMR imaging. Artefacts were categorized into grade 1 (excellent image quality), grade 2 (good), grade 3 (poor) and grade 4 (non-diagnostic) for each myocardial segment. One patient was excluded because of an incomplete CMR investigation due to claustrophobia. RESULTS: LCP caused an arc-shaped artefact (0.99 ± 0.16 cm(2)) at the right ventricular (RV) apex. Of 224 analyzed myocardial segments of the left ventricle (LV) 158 (70.5%) were affected by grade 1, 27 (12.1%) by grade 2, 17 (7.6%) by grade 3 and 22 (9.8%) by grade 4 artefacts. The artefact burden of grade 3 and 4 artefacts was significantly higher in the 3 Tesla group (3 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla: 3.7 ± 1.6 vs 1.9 ± 1.4 myocardial segments per patient, p = 0.03). A high artefact burden was particularly observed in the mid anteroseptal, inferoseptal and apical septal myocardial segments of the LV and in the mid and apical segments of the RV. Quantification of LV function and assessment of valves were feasible in all patients. We did not observe any clinical or device-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: CMR imaging in patients with LCP is feasible with excellent to good image quality in the majority of LV segments. The artefact burden is comparable small allowing an accurate evaluation of LV function, cardiac structures and valves. However, artefacts in the mid anteroseptal, inferoseptal and apical septal myocardial segments of the LV due to the LCP may impair or even exclude diagnostic evaluation of these segments. Artefacts on CMR images may be reduced by the use of 1.5 Tesla CMR scanners. BioMed Central 2018-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6033226/ /pubmed/29973228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0469-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kiblboeck, Daniel
Reiter, Christian
Kammler, Juergen
Schmit, Pierre
Blessberger, Hermann
Kellermair, Joerg
Fellner, Franz
Steinwender, Clemens
Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
title Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
title_full Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
title_fullStr Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
title_full_unstemmed Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
title_short Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
title_sort artefacts in 1.5 tesla and 3 tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0469-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kiblboeckdaniel artefactsin15teslaand3teslacardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithleadlesscardiacpacemakers
AT reiterchristian artefactsin15teslaand3teslacardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithleadlesscardiacpacemakers
AT kammlerjuergen artefactsin15teslaand3teslacardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithleadlesscardiacpacemakers
AT schmitpierre artefactsin15teslaand3teslacardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithleadlesscardiacpacemakers
AT blessbergerhermann artefactsin15teslaand3teslacardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithleadlesscardiacpacemakers
AT kellermairjoerg artefactsin15teslaand3teslacardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithleadlesscardiacpacemakers
AT fellnerfranz artefactsin15teslaand3teslacardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithleadlesscardiacpacemakers
AT steinwenderclemens artefactsin15teslaand3teslacardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithleadlesscardiacpacemakers