Cargando…

Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Comparison of Outcomes for Local and Radical Resection

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) most commonly originate from the stomach. Their treatment is dependent on size and whether they are symptomatic. Curative treatment requires surgery, which may be preceded by neoadjuvant imatinib if it is felt that this will aid in achieving clear (R0) resect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madhavan, Anantha, Phillips, Alexander W., Donohoe, Claire L., Willows, Rebecca J., Immanuel, Arul, Verril, Mark, Griffin, S. Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2140253
_version_ 1783337676503515136
author Madhavan, Anantha
Phillips, Alexander W.
Donohoe, Claire L.
Willows, Rebecca J.
Immanuel, Arul
Verril, Mark
Griffin, S. Michael
author_facet Madhavan, Anantha
Phillips, Alexander W.
Donohoe, Claire L.
Willows, Rebecca J.
Immanuel, Arul
Verril, Mark
Griffin, S. Michael
author_sort Madhavan, Anantha
collection PubMed
description Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) most commonly originate from the stomach. Their treatment is dependent on size and whether they are symptomatic. Curative treatment requires surgery, which may be preceded by neoadjuvant imatinib if it is felt that this will aid in achieving clear (R0) resection margins. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes from patients that underwent a “local” organ-preserving operation, with those that required a more radical resection, and the influences on selecting a more radical resection. A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic gastric GISTs from a single institution over 9 years was carried out. Patients were divided into three cohorts dependent on whether they had a “local” resection, “anatomical” resection, or “extended” resection. 71 patients were included. Overall, 5-year survival was 92%. Operating time, blood loss, and length of stay were significantly lower in the group undergoing local resection (p < 0.05). Tumour size was also smaller in the local group (median 4 cm versus 5 cm p < 0.05). Tumour location also influenced the type of surgery performed, with tumours at the cardia, gastroesophageal junction, and antrum all having “anatomical” resections. Lymphadenectomy did not appear to impact on outcomes. These findings indicate that local excision, where possible, does not impair oncological outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6033293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60332932018-07-22 Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Comparison of Outcomes for Local and Radical Resection Madhavan, Anantha Phillips, Alexander W. Donohoe, Claire L. Willows, Rebecca J. Immanuel, Arul Verril, Mark Griffin, S. Michael Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) most commonly originate from the stomach. Their treatment is dependent on size and whether they are symptomatic. Curative treatment requires surgery, which may be preceded by neoadjuvant imatinib if it is felt that this will aid in achieving clear (R0) resection margins. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes from patients that underwent a “local” organ-preserving operation, with those that required a more radical resection, and the influences on selecting a more radical resection. A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic gastric GISTs from a single institution over 9 years was carried out. Patients were divided into three cohorts dependent on whether they had a “local” resection, “anatomical” resection, or “extended” resection. 71 patients were included. Overall, 5-year survival was 92%. Operating time, blood loss, and length of stay were significantly lower in the group undergoing local resection (p < 0.05). Tumour size was also smaller in the local group (median 4 cm versus 5 cm p < 0.05). Tumour location also influenced the type of surgery performed, with tumours at the cardia, gastroesophageal junction, and antrum all having “anatomical” resections. Lymphadenectomy did not appear to impact on outcomes. These findings indicate that local excision, where possible, does not impair oncological outcomes. Hindawi 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6033293/ /pubmed/30034464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2140253 Text en Copyright © 2018 Anantha Madhavan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Madhavan, Anantha
Phillips, Alexander W.
Donohoe, Claire L.
Willows, Rebecca J.
Immanuel, Arul
Verril, Mark
Griffin, S. Michael
Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Comparison of Outcomes for Local and Radical Resection
title Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Comparison of Outcomes for Local and Radical Resection
title_full Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Comparison of Outcomes for Local and Radical Resection
title_fullStr Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Comparison of Outcomes for Local and Radical Resection
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Comparison of Outcomes for Local and Radical Resection
title_short Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Comparison of Outcomes for Local and Radical Resection
title_sort surgical management of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours: comparison of outcomes for local and radical resection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2140253
work_keys_str_mv AT madhavananantha surgicalmanagementofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumourscomparisonofoutcomesforlocalandradicalresection
AT phillipsalexanderw surgicalmanagementofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumourscomparisonofoutcomesforlocalandradicalresection
AT donohoeclairel surgicalmanagementofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumourscomparisonofoutcomesforlocalandradicalresection
AT willowsrebeccaj surgicalmanagementofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumourscomparisonofoutcomesforlocalandradicalresection
AT immanuelarul surgicalmanagementofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumourscomparisonofoutcomesforlocalandradicalresection
AT verrilmark surgicalmanagementofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumourscomparisonofoutcomesforlocalandradicalresection
AT griffinsmichael surgicalmanagementofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumourscomparisonofoutcomesforlocalandradicalresection