Cargando…
The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality
Body armor is essential to the protection of military personnel; however, body armor may impede the users balance and movement quality. A better understanding of the influence of body armor on balance and movement quality may help in the development of new guidelines for training standards and proce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Berkeley Electronic Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29997722 |
_version_ | 1783337712974036992 |
---|---|
author | KOLLOCK, ROGER O. HALE, DAVIS VOGELPOHL, RACHELE KREMER, LOGAN HORNER, JOSH COX, CHRISTIAN ALLEN, MATT |
author_facet | KOLLOCK, ROGER O. HALE, DAVIS VOGELPOHL, RACHELE KREMER, LOGAN HORNER, JOSH COX, CHRISTIAN ALLEN, MATT |
author_sort | KOLLOCK, ROGER O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Body armor is essential to the protection of military personnel; however, body armor may impede the users balance and movement quality. A better understanding of the influence of body armor on balance and movement quality may help in the development of new guidelines for training standards and procedures to mitigate the risk of injury associated with wearing of body armor in warfighters. The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of body armor (combat boots, tactical vest and combat helmet) on balance and movement quality in male military cadets and personnel. Twelve male participants completed the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) under two separate conditions, body armor and non-body armor. Results indicated a significant difference in FMS composite score between the non-body armor and body armor conditions (p =.012), with the non-body armor condition resulting in significantly higher FMS scores than the body armor condition. Additionally, the FMS item score for shoulder mobility was significantly higher (2.25±0.62) in the non-body armor condition than the body armor condition (p= 0.03). The SEBT composite and the three individual reach distances were not significantly different between conditions. Based on the current findings, body armor within a 4.8 kg – 5.3 kg range does appear to impact movement quality as evaluated using the FMS in male military personnel and cadets. More research is needed to determine a threshold of compensatory movement patterns relative to an increase in body armor weight. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6033495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Berkeley Electronic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60334952018-07-09 The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality KOLLOCK, ROGER O. HALE, DAVIS VOGELPOHL, RACHELE KREMER, LOGAN HORNER, JOSH COX, CHRISTIAN ALLEN, MATT Int J Exerc Sci Original Research Body armor is essential to the protection of military personnel; however, body armor may impede the users balance and movement quality. A better understanding of the influence of body armor on balance and movement quality may help in the development of new guidelines for training standards and procedures to mitigate the risk of injury associated with wearing of body armor in warfighters. The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of body armor (combat boots, tactical vest and combat helmet) on balance and movement quality in male military cadets and personnel. Twelve male participants completed the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) under two separate conditions, body armor and non-body armor. Results indicated a significant difference in FMS composite score between the non-body armor and body armor conditions (p =.012), with the non-body armor condition resulting in significantly higher FMS scores than the body armor condition. Additionally, the FMS item score for shoulder mobility was significantly higher (2.25±0.62) in the non-body armor condition than the body armor condition (p= 0.03). The SEBT composite and the three individual reach distances were not significantly different between conditions. Based on the current findings, body armor within a 4.8 kg – 5.3 kg range does appear to impact movement quality as evaluated using the FMS in male military personnel and cadets. More research is needed to determine a threshold of compensatory movement patterns relative to an increase in body armor weight. Berkeley Electronic Press 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6033495/ /pubmed/29997722 Text en |
spellingShingle | Original Research KOLLOCK, ROGER O. HALE, DAVIS VOGELPOHL, RACHELE KREMER, LOGAN HORNER, JOSH COX, CHRISTIAN ALLEN, MATT The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality |
title | The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality |
title_full | The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality |
title_short | The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality |
title_sort | influence of body armor on balance and movement quality |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29997722 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kollockrogero theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT haledavis theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT vogelpohlrachele theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT kremerlogan theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT hornerjosh theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT coxchristian theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT allenmatt theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT kollockrogero influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT haledavis influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT vogelpohlrachele influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT kremerlogan influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT hornerjosh influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT coxchristian influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality AT allenmatt influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality |