Cargando…

The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality

Body armor is essential to the protection of military personnel; however, body armor may impede the users balance and movement quality. A better understanding of the influence of body armor on balance and movement quality may help in the development of new guidelines for training standards and proce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KOLLOCK, ROGER O., HALE, DAVIS, VOGELPOHL, RACHELE, KREMER, LOGAN, HORNER, JOSH, COX, CHRISTIAN, ALLEN, MATT
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29997722
_version_ 1783337712974036992
author KOLLOCK, ROGER O.
HALE, DAVIS
VOGELPOHL, RACHELE
KREMER, LOGAN
HORNER, JOSH
COX, CHRISTIAN
ALLEN, MATT
author_facet KOLLOCK, ROGER O.
HALE, DAVIS
VOGELPOHL, RACHELE
KREMER, LOGAN
HORNER, JOSH
COX, CHRISTIAN
ALLEN, MATT
author_sort KOLLOCK, ROGER O.
collection PubMed
description Body armor is essential to the protection of military personnel; however, body armor may impede the users balance and movement quality. A better understanding of the influence of body armor on balance and movement quality may help in the development of new guidelines for training standards and procedures to mitigate the risk of injury associated with wearing of body armor in warfighters. The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of body armor (combat boots, tactical vest and combat helmet) on balance and movement quality in male military cadets and personnel. Twelve male participants completed the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) under two separate conditions, body armor and non-body armor. Results indicated a significant difference in FMS composite score between the non-body armor and body armor conditions (p =.012), with the non-body armor condition resulting in significantly higher FMS scores than the body armor condition. Additionally, the FMS item score for shoulder mobility was significantly higher (2.25±0.62) in the non-body armor condition than the body armor condition (p= 0.03). The SEBT composite and the three individual reach distances were not significantly different between conditions. Based on the current findings, body armor within a 4.8 kg – 5.3 kg range does appear to impact movement quality as evaluated using the FMS in male military personnel and cadets. More research is needed to determine a threshold of compensatory movement patterns relative to an increase in body armor weight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6033495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60334952018-07-09 The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality KOLLOCK, ROGER O. HALE, DAVIS VOGELPOHL, RACHELE KREMER, LOGAN HORNER, JOSH COX, CHRISTIAN ALLEN, MATT Int J Exerc Sci Original Research Body armor is essential to the protection of military personnel; however, body armor may impede the users balance and movement quality. A better understanding of the influence of body armor on balance and movement quality may help in the development of new guidelines for training standards and procedures to mitigate the risk of injury associated with wearing of body armor in warfighters. The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of body armor (combat boots, tactical vest and combat helmet) on balance and movement quality in male military cadets and personnel. Twelve male participants completed the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) under two separate conditions, body armor and non-body armor. Results indicated a significant difference in FMS composite score between the non-body armor and body armor conditions (p =.012), with the non-body armor condition resulting in significantly higher FMS scores than the body armor condition. Additionally, the FMS item score for shoulder mobility was significantly higher (2.25±0.62) in the non-body armor condition than the body armor condition (p= 0.03). The SEBT composite and the three individual reach distances were not significantly different between conditions. Based on the current findings, body armor within a 4.8 kg – 5.3 kg range does appear to impact movement quality as evaluated using the FMS in male military personnel and cadets. More research is needed to determine a threshold of compensatory movement patterns relative to an increase in body armor weight. Berkeley Electronic Press 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6033495/ /pubmed/29997722 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
KOLLOCK, ROGER O.
HALE, DAVIS
VOGELPOHL, RACHELE
KREMER, LOGAN
HORNER, JOSH
COX, CHRISTIAN
ALLEN, MATT
The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality
title The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality
title_full The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality
title_fullStr The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality
title_short The Influence of Body Armor on Balance and Movement Quality
title_sort influence of body armor on balance and movement quality
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29997722
work_keys_str_mv AT kollockrogero theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT haledavis theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT vogelpohlrachele theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT kremerlogan theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT hornerjosh theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT coxchristian theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT allenmatt theinfluenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT kollockrogero influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT haledavis influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT vogelpohlrachele influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT kremerlogan influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT hornerjosh influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT coxchristian influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality
AT allenmatt influenceofbodyarmoronbalanceandmovementquality