Cargando…

Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running

Barefoot running is considered to decrease injury risk, but is not always practical, particularly while running on a fitness center treadmill. The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematics of shod, barefoot, and simulated barefoot running. Twelve subjects (age = 21.1 ± 1.2 years) who regul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LEBLANC, MICHELE, FERKRANUS, HEIDI
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29997724
_version_ 1783337715263078400
author LEBLANC, MICHELE
FERKRANUS, HEIDI
author_facet LEBLANC, MICHELE
FERKRANUS, HEIDI
author_sort LEBLANC, MICHELE
collection PubMed
description Barefoot running is considered to decrease injury risk, but is not always practical, particularly while running on a fitness center treadmill. The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematics of shod, barefoot, and simulated barefoot running. Twelve subjects (age = 21.1 ± 1.2 years) who regularly run on a treadmill for fitness participated in the study. After a warm up, each runner ran on a Biodex RTM 400 treadmill set at 7.4 mph (approximately 3.3 m/s) in their own shoes, barefoot, and while running “like they were barefoot” in their own shoes. Sixteen reflective markers were affixed to each subject to use PlugInGait (Vicon) to determine three-dimensional body landmark coordinates and to compute lower extremity joint angles. Values at touchdown and during stance were averaged over ten strides for analysis. Repeated measures ANOVA was implemented to determine differences based on running condition (p < 0.05) and post hoc testing was performed with an adjustment for multiple comparisons (p<0.05/3). At touchdown, ankle angle values significantly differed based on condition (6.2 ± 5.9° vs. −4.0 ± 12.0° vs, −0.2 ± 13.3°; p = 0.004 for shod, barefoot and simulated barefoot running, respectively) indicating that when simulating barefoot running the subjects altered their foot strike pattern. Stride frequency differed between shod and barefoot running (1.415±0.068 Hz vs. 1.457±0.065 Hz; p = 0.001) but the simulated barefoot condition did not differ from the shod condition. The runners were able to simulate an important element of barefoot running, but they did not completely mimic their barefoot running pattern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6033505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60335052018-07-09 Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running LEBLANC, MICHELE FERKRANUS, HEIDI Int J Exerc Sci Original Research Barefoot running is considered to decrease injury risk, but is not always practical, particularly while running on a fitness center treadmill. The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematics of shod, barefoot, and simulated barefoot running. Twelve subjects (age = 21.1 ± 1.2 years) who regularly run on a treadmill for fitness participated in the study. After a warm up, each runner ran on a Biodex RTM 400 treadmill set at 7.4 mph (approximately 3.3 m/s) in their own shoes, barefoot, and while running “like they were barefoot” in their own shoes. Sixteen reflective markers were affixed to each subject to use PlugInGait (Vicon) to determine three-dimensional body landmark coordinates and to compute lower extremity joint angles. Values at touchdown and during stance were averaged over ten strides for analysis. Repeated measures ANOVA was implemented to determine differences based on running condition (p < 0.05) and post hoc testing was performed with an adjustment for multiple comparisons (p<0.05/3). At touchdown, ankle angle values significantly differed based on condition (6.2 ± 5.9° vs. −4.0 ± 12.0° vs, −0.2 ± 13.3°; p = 0.004 for shod, barefoot and simulated barefoot running, respectively) indicating that when simulating barefoot running the subjects altered their foot strike pattern. Stride frequency differed between shod and barefoot running (1.415±0.068 Hz vs. 1.457±0.065 Hz; p = 0.001) but the simulated barefoot condition did not differ from the shod condition. The runners were able to simulate an important element of barefoot running, but they did not completely mimic their barefoot running pattern. Berkeley Electronic Press 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6033505/ /pubmed/29997724 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
LEBLANC, MICHELE
FERKRANUS, HEIDI
Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running
title Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running
title_full Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running
title_fullStr Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running
title_full_unstemmed Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running
title_short Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running
title_sort lower extremity joint kinematics of shod, barefoot, and simulated barefoot treadmill running
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29997724
work_keys_str_mv AT leblancmichele lowerextremityjointkinematicsofshodbarefootandsimulatedbarefoottreadmillrunning
AT ferkranusheidi lowerextremityjointkinematicsofshodbarefootandsimulatedbarefoottreadmillrunning