Cargando…

A multicenter retrospective study aiming to identify patients who respond well to adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES: Adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis (GMA) with the Adacolumn has been introduced as a non-pharmacologic treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, a subset of patients who might respond well to GMA needs to be targeted. This study was conducted at three IBD centers to determine facto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamamoto, Takayuki, Iida, Takayuki, Ikeya, Kentaro, Kato, Masaichi, Matsuura, Ai, Tamura, Satoshi, Takano, Ryosuke, Tani, Shinya, Osawa, Satoshi, Sugimoto, Ken, Shimoyama, Takahiro, Hanai, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41424-018-0037-0
_version_ 1783337761561903104
author Yamamoto, Takayuki
Iida, Takayuki
Ikeya, Kentaro
Kato, Masaichi
Matsuura, Ai
Tamura, Satoshi
Takano, Ryosuke
Tani, Shinya
Osawa, Satoshi
Sugimoto, Ken
Shimoyama, Takahiro
Hanai, Hiroyuki
author_facet Yamamoto, Takayuki
Iida, Takayuki
Ikeya, Kentaro
Kato, Masaichi
Matsuura, Ai
Tamura, Satoshi
Takano, Ryosuke
Tani, Shinya
Osawa, Satoshi
Sugimoto, Ken
Shimoyama, Takahiro
Hanai, Hiroyuki
author_sort Yamamoto, Takayuki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis (GMA) with the Adacolumn has been introduced as a non-pharmacologic treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, a subset of patients who might respond well to GMA needs to be targeted. This study was conducted at three IBD centers to determine factors affecting the efficacy of GMA in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2017, a total of 894 active episodes (first attack or relapse) in 593 patients were treated with GMA. Clinical remission was defined as normal stool frequency and no rectal bleeding. Multiple clinical and laboratory parameters at entry were considered for efficacy assessment. RESULTS: Clinical remission was achieved during 422 (47%) of the 894 treatment cases. In the multivariate analysis, predictors for favorable response to GMA were age ≤60 years, UC duration <1 year, Mayo endoscopic subscore 2 (vs. 3), steroid naïve UC, and biologic naïve UC. Clinical remission rate was 70% in patients with four of the five factors, 52% in patients with three factors, 46% in patients with two factors, 39% in patients with one factor, and 18% in patients with none of these factors. Overall, the clinical remission rate was significantly higher in patients with a greater number of the five predictors (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: GMA appeared to be effective in steroid naïve and biologic naïve patients with short duration of UC. Elderly patients (>60 years) and those with severe endoscopic activity did not respond well to GMA. Additional, well designed, prospective, controlled trials should strengthen our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6033883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60338832018-07-06 A multicenter retrospective study aiming to identify patients who respond well to adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis Yamamoto, Takayuki Iida, Takayuki Ikeya, Kentaro Kato, Masaichi Matsuura, Ai Tamura, Satoshi Takano, Ryosuke Tani, Shinya Osawa, Satoshi Sugimoto, Ken Shimoyama, Takahiro Hanai, Hiroyuki Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article OBJECTIVES: Adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis (GMA) with the Adacolumn has been introduced as a non-pharmacologic treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, a subset of patients who might respond well to GMA needs to be targeted. This study was conducted at three IBD centers to determine factors affecting the efficacy of GMA in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2017, a total of 894 active episodes (first attack or relapse) in 593 patients were treated with GMA. Clinical remission was defined as normal stool frequency and no rectal bleeding. Multiple clinical and laboratory parameters at entry were considered for efficacy assessment. RESULTS: Clinical remission was achieved during 422 (47%) of the 894 treatment cases. In the multivariate analysis, predictors for favorable response to GMA were age ≤60 years, UC duration <1 year, Mayo endoscopic subscore 2 (vs. 3), steroid naïve UC, and biologic naïve UC. Clinical remission rate was 70% in patients with four of the five factors, 52% in patients with three factors, 46% in patients with two factors, 39% in patients with one factor, and 18% in patients with none of these factors. Overall, the clinical remission rate was significantly higher in patients with a greater number of the five predictors (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: GMA appeared to be effective in steroid naïve and biologic naïve patients with short duration of UC. Elderly patients (>60 years) and those with severe endoscopic activity did not respond well to GMA. Additional, well designed, prospective, controlled trials should strengthen our findings. Nature Publishing Group US 2018-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6033883/ /pubmed/29977035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41424-018-0037-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Yamamoto, Takayuki
Iida, Takayuki
Ikeya, Kentaro
Kato, Masaichi
Matsuura, Ai
Tamura, Satoshi
Takano, Ryosuke
Tani, Shinya
Osawa, Satoshi
Sugimoto, Ken
Shimoyama, Takahiro
Hanai, Hiroyuki
A multicenter retrospective study aiming to identify patients who respond well to adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
title A multicenter retrospective study aiming to identify patients who respond well to adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
title_full A multicenter retrospective study aiming to identify patients who respond well to adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
title_fullStr A multicenter retrospective study aiming to identify patients who respond well to adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
title_full_unstemmed A multicenter retrospective study aiming to identify patients who respond well to adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
title_short A multicenter retrospective study aiming to identify patients who respond well to adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
title_sort multicenter retrospective study aiming to identify patients who respond well to adsorptive granulomonocytapheresis in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41424-018-0037-0
work_keys_str_mv AT yamamototakayuki amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT iidatakayuki amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT ikeyakentaro amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT katomasaichi amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT matsuuraai amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT tamurasatoshi amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT takanoryosuke amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT tanishinya amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT osawasatoshi amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT sugimotoken amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT shimoyamatakahiro amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT hanaihiroyuki amulticenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT yamamototakayuki multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT iidatakayuki multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT ikeyakentaro multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT katomasaichi multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT matsuuraai multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT tamurasatoshi multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT takanoryosuke multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT tanishinya multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT osawasatoshi multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT sugimotoken multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT shimoyamatakahiro multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis
AT hanaihiroyuki multicenterretrospectivestudyaimingtoidentifypatientswhorespondwelltoadsorptivegranulomonocytapheresisinmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis