Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Streptococcus mutans Counts in Saliva: An in vivo Study
Dental caries is a disease of multifactorial origin and Streptococcus mutans is considered as the chief pathogen responsible for its development. However, reduction in the number of pathogenic bacteria, particularly S. mutans, with the use of various preventive measures, can reduce dental caries to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6034049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29991860 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1492 |
_version_ | 1783337799779352576 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Megha Pandit, Inder K Srivastava, Nikhil Gugnani, Neeraj Gupta, Monika |
author_facet | Sharma, Megha Pandit, Inder K Srivastava, Nikhil Gugnani, Neeraj Gupta, Monika |
author_sort | Sharma, Megha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dental caries is a disease of multifactorial origin and Streptococcus mutans is considered as the chief pathogen responsible for its development. However, reduction in the number of pathogenic bacteria, particularly S. mutans, with the use of various preventive measures, can reduce dental caries to a significant level. Therefore, the present clinical study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the efficacy of toothbrushing, fluoride varnish, chlorhexidine mouthwash, and a probiotic (Yakult) in reducing the S. mutans counts in the saliva using Dentocult SM Strip Mutans kit in children. A total of 40 school students between the age group of 4 and 8 years were selected for the study and S. mutans count was taken on the first dental visit using Dentocult SM Strip Mutans test kit. After the initial scores of S. mutans were obtained, the children were divided into four groups and provided with different caries preventive regimen for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, the scores of S. mutans were reevaluated for reduction in their counts, if any. The data thus collected were tabulated and statistically analyzed. All the groups showed a significant reduction in S. mutans counts with the highest reduction from the Fluor Protector varnish followed by chlorhexidine mouthwash, probiotic (Yakult), and toothbrushing. How to cite this article: Sharma M, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M. A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Streptococcus mutans Counts in Saliva: An in vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018;11(2):94-99. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6034049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60340492018-07-10 A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Streptococcus mutans Counts in Saliva: An in vivo Study Sharma, Megha Pandit, Inder K Srivastava, Nikhil Gugnani, Neeraj Gupta, Monika Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article Dental caries is a disease of multifactorial origin and Streptococcus mutans is considered as the chief pathogen responsible for its development. However, reduction in the number of pathogenic bacteria, particularly S. mutans, with the use of various preventive measures, can reduce dental caries to a significant level. Therefore, the present clinical study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the efficacy of toothbrushing, fluoride varnish, chlorhexidine mouthwash, and a probiotic (Yakult) in reducing the S. mutans counts in the saliva using Dentocult SM Strip Mutans kit in children. A total of 40 school students between the age group of 4 and 8 years were selected for the study and S. mutans count was taken on the first dental visit using Dentocult SM Strip Mutans test kit. After the initial scores of S. mutans were obtained, the children were divided into four groups and provided with different caries preventive regimen for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, the scores of S. mutans were reevaluated for reduction in their counts, if any. The data thus collected were tabulated and statistically analyzed. All the groups showed a significant reduction in S. mutans counts with the highest reduction from the Fluor Protector varnish followed by chlorhexidine mouthwash, probiotic (Yakult), and toothbrushing. How to cite this article: Sharma M, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M. A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Streptococcus mutans Counts in Saliva: An in vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018;11(2):94-99. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2018 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6034049/ /pubmed/29991860 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1492 Text en Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Megha Pandit, Inder K Srivastava, Nikhil Gugnani, Neeraj Gupta, Monika A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Streptococcus mutans Counts in Saliva: An in vivo Study |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Streptococcus mutans Counts in Saliva: An in vivo Study |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Streptococcus mutans Counts in Saliva: An in vivo Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Streptococcus mutans Counts in Saliva: An in vivo Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Streptococcus mutans Counts in Saliva: An in vivo Study |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Streptococcus mutans Counts in Saliva: An in vivo Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of efficacy of streptococcus mutans counts in saliva: an in vivo study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6034049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29991860 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmamegha acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofstreptococcusmutanscountsinsalivaaninvivostudy AT panditinderk acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofstreptococcusmutanscountsinsalivaaninvivostudy AT srivastavanikhil acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofstreptococcusmutanscountsinsalivaaninvivostudy AT gugnanineeraj acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofstreptococcusmutanscountsinsalivaaninvivostudy AT guptamonika acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofstreptococcusmutanscountsinsalivaaninvivostudy AT sharmamegha comparativeevaluationofefficacyofstreptococcusmutanscountsinsalivaaninvivostudy AT panditinderk comparativeevaluationofefficacyofstreptococcusmutanscountsinsalivaaninvivostudy AT srivastavanikhil comparativeevaluationofefficacyofstreptococcusmutanscountsinsalivaaninvivostudy AT gugnanineeraj comparativeevaluationofefficacyofstreptococcusmutanscountsinsalivaaninvivostudy AT guptamonika comparativeevaluationofefficacyofstreptococcusmutanscountsinsalivaaninvivostudy |