Cargando…

How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios

BACKGROUND: The Choosing Wisely campaign highlights the importance of clinical reasoning abilities for competent and reflective physicians. The principles of this campaign should be addressed in undergraduate medical education. Recent research suggests that answering questions on important steps in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ludwig, Sascha, Schuelper, Nikolai, Brown, Jamie, Anders, Sven, Raupach, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6034339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1090-y
_version_ 1783337861395775488
author Ludwig, Sascha
Schuelper, Nikolai
Brown, Jamie
Anders, Sven
Raupach, Tobias
author_facet Ludwig, Sascha
Schuelper, Nikolai
Brown, Jamie
Anders, Sven
Raupach, Tobias
author_sort Ludwig, Sascha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Choosing Wisely campaign highlights the importance of clinical reasoning abilities for competent and reflective physicians. The principles of this campaign should be addressed in undergraduate medical education. Recent research suggests that answering questions on important steps in patient management promotes knowledge retention. It is less clear whether increasing the authenticity of educational material by the inclusion of videos further enhances learning outcome. METHODS: In a prospective randomised controlled cross-over study, we assessed whether repeated video-based testing is more effective than repeated text-based testing in training students to choose appropriate diagnostic tests, arrive at correct diagnoses and identify advisable therapies. Following an entry exam, fourth-year undergraduate medical students attended 10 weekly computer-based seminars during which they studied patient case histories. Each case contained five key feature questions (items) on the diagnosis and treatment of the presented patient. Students were randomly allocated to read text cases (control condition) or watch videos (intervention), and assignment to either text or video was switched between groups every week. Using a within-subjects design, student performance on video-based and text-based items was assessed 13 weeks (exit exam) and 9 months (retention test) after the first day of term. The primary outcome was the within-subject difference in performance on video-based and text-based items in the exit exam. RESULTS: Of 125 eligible students, 93 provided data for all three exams (response rate 74.4%). Percent scores were significantly higher for video-based than for text-based items in the exit exam (76.2 ± 19.4% vs. 72.4 ± 19.1%, p = 0.026) but not the retention test (69.2 ± 20.2% vs. 66.4 ± 20.3%, p = 0.108). An additional Bayesian analysis of this retention test suggested that video-based training is marginally more effective than text-based training in the long term (Bayes factor 2.36). Regardless of presentation format, student responses revealed a high prevalence of erroneous beliefs that, if applied to the clinical context, could place patients at risk. CONCLUSION: Repeated video-based key feature testing produces superior short-term learning outcome compared to text-based testing. Given the high prevalence of misconceptions, efforts to improve clinical reasoning training in medical education are warranted. The Choosing Wisely campaign lends itself to being part of this process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-018-1090-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6034339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60343392018-07-09 How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios Ludwig, Sascha Schuelper, Nikolai Brown, Jamie Anders, Sven Raupach, Tobias BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The Choosing Wisely campaign highlights the importance of clinical reasoning abilities for competent and reflective physicians. The principles of this campaign should be addressed in undergraduate medical education. Recent research suggests that answering questions on important steps in patient management promotes knowledge retention. It is less clear whether increasing the authenticity of educational material by the inclusion of videos further enhances learning outcome. METHODS: In a prospective randomised controlled cross-over study, we assessed whether repeated video-based testing is more effective than repeated text-based testing in training students to choose appropriate diagnostic tests, arrive at correct diagnoses and identify advisable therapies. Following an entry exam, fourth-year undergraduate medical students attended 10 weekly computer-based seminars during which they studied patient case histories. Each case contained five key feature questions (items) on the diagnosis and treatment of the presented patient. Students were randomly allocated to read text cases (control condition) or watch videos (intervention), and assignment to either text or video was switched between groups every week. Using a within-subjects design, student performance on video-based and text-based items was assessed 13 weeks (exit exam) and 9 months (retention test) after the first day of term. The primary outcome was the within-subject difference in performance on video-based and text-based items in the exit exam. RESULTS: Of 125 eligible students, 93 provided data for all three exams (response rate 74.4%). Percent scores were significantly higher for video-based than for text-based items in the exit exam (76.2 ± 19.4% vs. 72.4 ± 19.1%, p = 0.026) but not the retention test (69.2 ± 20.2% vs. 66.4 ± 20.3%, p = 0.108). An additional Bayesian analysis of this retention test suggested that video-based training is marginally more effective than text-based training in the long term (Bayes factor 2.36). Regardless of presentation format, student responses revealed a high prevalence of erroneous beliefs that, if applied to the clinical context, could place patients at risk. CONCLUSION: Repeated video-based key feature testing produces superior short-term learning outcome compared to text-based testing. Given the high prevalence of misconceptions, efforts to improve clinical reasoning training in medical education are warranted. The Choosing Wisely campaign lends itself to being part of this process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-018-1090-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6034339/ /pubmed/29976211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1090-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ludwig, Sascha
Schuelper, Nikolai
Brown, Jamie
Anders, Sven
Raupach, Tobias
How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios
title How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios
title_full How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios
title_fullStr How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios
title_full_unstemmed How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios
title_short How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios
title_sort how can we teach medical students to choose wisely? a randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6034339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1090-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ludwigsascha howcanweteachmedicalstudentstochoosewiselyarandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyofvideoversustextbasedcasescenarios
AT schuelpernikolai howcanweteachmedicalstudentstochoosewiselyarandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyofvideoversustextbasedcasescenarios
AT brownjamie howcanweteachmedicalstudentstochoosewiselyarandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyofvideoversustextbasedcasescenarios
AT anderssven howcanweteachmedicalstudentstochoosewiselyarandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyofvideoversustextbasedcasescenarios
AT raupachtobias howcanweteachmedicalstudentstochoosewiselyarandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyofvideoversustextbasedcasescenarios