Cargando…
Evaluation of Xpert(®) Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampin in sputum-smear negative and sputum-scarce patients with pulmonary tuberculosis using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
CONTEXT: Sputum smear-negative and sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is a diagnostic challenge. Xpert(®) Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampin (MTB/RIF) provides a rapid diagnosis on high-quality biological specimen obtained by bronchoscopy. AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate Xpert(®)...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6034363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29970767 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_412_17 |
Sumario: | CONTEXT: Sputum smear-negative and sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is a diagnostic challenge. Xpert(®) Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampin (MTB/RIF) provides a rapid diagnosis on high-quality biological specimen obtained by bronchoscopy. AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate Xpert(®) MTB/RIF on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in sputum smear-negative and sputum-scarce PTB patients. SETTINGS: Tertiary care hospital in India. DESIGN: This was prospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2015 and November 2016, we prospectively recruited sputum-smear negative and sputum-scarce patients under evaluation for PTB and performed BAL. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated for the diagnosis of PTB on BAL fluid for acid-fast bacilli smear and Xpert(®) MTB/RIF using liquid culture as the reference standard and compared to the final diagnosis based on composite reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated with 95% class intervals. McNemar's test was used for comparison of sensitivities. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients included, 52 (88.3%) had a final diagnosis of PTB and 16 (26.7%) were culture confirmed. Xpert(®) MTB/RIF had a sensitivity and specificity of 81% (54%–96%) and 73% (56%–85%) in culture confirmed cases; 46% (32%–60%) and 100% (63%–100%) for the final diagnosis; 32% (17%–51%) and 100% (54%–100%) in culture negative cases, respectively. Culture had a sensitivity of 32% (20%–47%) for the final diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In sputum smear-negative and sputum-scarce patients with clinico-radiological features of PTB Xpert(®) MTB/RIF has good sensitivity for diagnosis on BAL fluid. It is useful even when cultures are negative. |
---|