Cargando…
The Urological Society of India survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists
INTRODUCTION: The Urological Society of India guidelines panel on urinary incontinence (UI) conducted a survey among its members to determine their practice patterns in the management of UI. The results of this survey are reported in this manuscript. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was carried o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6034410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034131 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_85_18 |
_version_ | 1783337875637534720 |
---|---|
author | Sinha, Sanjay Yande, Shirish Patel, Anita Vaze, Ajit Sarkar, Kalyan Raina, Shailesh Agarwal, Mayank Mohan Vasudeva, Pawan Khattar, Nikhil Madduri, Vijay Kumar Sarma Mishra, Nagendranath Jain, Amita Gupta, Manu |
author_facet | Sinha, Sanjay Yande, Shirish Patel, Anita Vaze, Ajit Sarkar, Kalyan Raina, Shailesh Agarwal, Mayank Mohan Vasudeva, Pawan Khattar, Nikhil Madduri, Vijay Kumar Sarma Mishra, Nagendranath Jain, Amita Gupta, Manu |
author_sort | Sinha, Sanjay |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Urological Society of India guidelines panel on urinary incontinence (UI) conducted a survey among its members to determine their practice patterns in the management of UI. The results of this survey are reported in this manuscript. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was carried out among members of the USI to determine their practice patterns regarding UI using a predeveloped questionnaire on using SurveyMonkey(®). A second 4-question randomized telephonic survey of the nonresponders was performed after closure of the online survey. Data were analyzed by R software 3.1.3 (P < 0.05 significant). RESULTS: A total of 468 of 2109 (22.2%) members responded to the online survey. Nearly 97% were urologists, 74.8% were working at a private, and 39.4% were in an academic institution. Almost all were managing UI. 84.2% had local access to a urodynamics (UDS) facility. 85.8% would check postvoid residual urine for all the patients. Voiding diary, symptom scores, quality of life scores, pad test, Q-tip test, stress test, uroflow, and cystoscopy were ordered as part of evaluation by 86.0%, 49.8%, 24.4%, 22.0%, 6.0%, 71.8%, 69.2%, and 34.7%, respectively. 47.6% would order a UDS for patients with urgency UI who fail conservative treatment. 36.9% would get UDS prior to all stress UI surgery. Seventy-five percent would make a diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Solifenacin was the first choice for urgency UI in general and darifenacin was preferred in elderly. Botulinum was the first choice for refractory urgency UI. Midurethral sling was the commonest procedure for surgical management of SUI (95.1%). 147 of the 1641 non responders were randomly sampled telephonically. Telephonic respondents had similar access to UDS facility but had performed fewer lifetime number of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) surgeries. Combining data from both surveys, total number of artificial sphincters and PPI surgeries ever performed by USI members was estimated at 375 and 718 respectively. CONCLUSION: This survey provides important new data and elicits critical differences in management practices based on demographics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6034410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60344102018-07-20 The Urological Society of India survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists Sinha, Sanjay Yande, Shirish Patel, Anita Vaze, Ajit Sarkar, Kalyan Raina, Shailesh Agarwal, Mayank Mohan Vasudeva, Pawan Khattar, Nikhil Madduri, Vijay Kumar Sarma Mishra, Nagendranath Jain, Amita Gupta, Manu Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Urological Society of India guidelines panel on urinary incontinence (UI) conducted a survey among its members to determine their practice patterns in the management of UI. The results of this survey are reported in this manuscript. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was carried out among members of the USI to determine their practice patterns regarding UI using a predeveloped questionnaire on using SurveyMonkey(®). A second 4-question randomized telephonic survey of the nonresponders was performed after closure of the online survey. Data were analyzed by R software 3.1.3 (P < 0.05 significant). RESULTS: A total of 468 of 2109 (22.2%) members responded to the online survey. Nearly 97% were urologists, 74.8% were working at a private, and 39.4% were in an academic institution. Almost all were managing UI. 84.2% had local access to a urodynamics (UDS) facility. 85.8% would check postvoid residual urine for all the patients. Voiding diary, symptom scores, quality of life scores, pad test, Q-tip test, stress test, uroflow, and cystoscopy were ordered as part of evaluation by 86.0%, 49.8%, 24.4%, 22.0%, 6.0%, 71.8%, 69.2%, and 34.7%, respectively. 47.6% would order a UDS for patients with urgency UI who fail conservative treatment. 36.9% would get UDS prior to all stress UI surgery. Seventy-five percent would make a diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Solifenacin was the first choice for urgency UI in general and darifenacin was preferred in elderly. Botulinum was the first choice for refractory urgency UI. Midurethral sling was the commonest procedure for surgical management of SUI (95.1%). 147 of the 1641 non responders were randomly sampled telephonically. Telephonic respondents had similar access to UDS facility but had performed fewer lifetime number of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) surgeries. Combining data from both surveys, total number of artificial sphincters and PPI surgeries ever performed by USI members was estimated at 375 and 718 respectively. CONCLUSION: This survey provides important new data and elicits critical differences in management practices based on demographics. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6034410/ /pubmed/30034131 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_85_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sinha, Sanjay Yande, Shirish Patel, Anita Vaze, Ajit Sarkar, Kalyan Raina, Shailesh Agarwal, Mayank Mohan Vasudeva, Pawan Khattar, Nikhil Madduri, Vijay Kumar Sarma Mishra, Nagendranath Jain, Amita Gupta, Manu The Urological Society of India survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists |
title | The Urological Society of India survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists |
title_full | The Urological Society of India survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists |
title_fullStr | The Urological Society of India survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists |
title_full_unstemmed | The Urological Society of India survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists |
title_short | The Urological Society of India survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists |
title_sort | urological society of india survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6034410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034131 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_85_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sinhasanjay theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT yandeshirish theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT patelanita theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT vazeajit theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT sarkarkalyan theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT rainashailesh theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT agarwalmayankmohan theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT vasudevapawan theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT khattarnikhil theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT maddurivijaykumarsarma theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT mishranagendranath theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT jainamita theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT guptamanu theurologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT sinhasanjay urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT yandeshirish urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT patelanita urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT vazeajit urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT sarkarkalyan urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT rainashailesh urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT agarwalmayankmohan urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT vasudevapawan urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT khattarnikhil urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT maddurivijaykumarsarma urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT mishranagendranath urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT jainamita urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists AT guptamanu urologicalsocietyofindiasurveyonurinaryincontinencepracticepatternsamongurologists |